Hi k-Schur fans,
I just pushed a first prototype for the new k-Schur function layout, where
they actually live in a subspace of the ring of symmetric functions.
Try the following with the patch kschur-fix-as.patch applied (this is based
on an old patch by Jason):
sage: Sym = SymmetricFunctions(QQ
Hell !!!
> That's arguable indeed. However I introduced this feature last year
> only, whereas the poset library is four years old. So making this the
> default would break backward compatibility.
I like to break backward compatibility. It makes the user feel like
the software is
Salut Nathann!
>I would personnally expect this to be the default behaviour,
That's arguable indeed. However I introduced this feature last year
only, whereas the poset library is four years old. So making this the
default would break backward compatibility. Beside, with a facade
pose
Hell !!!
What happens if you add facade=True ?
>
It works ! ;-)
sage: p = [1,2,3,4,5]
sage: P = Poset( (p, lambda x,y:x,
,
,
,
]
sage: P = Poset( (p, lambda x,y:x, ,
, ,
]
I would personnally expect this to be the default behaviour, especially
when the document
> But come on Just look at that !!!
> sage: P = Poset( (range(len(p)), comparison) )
What happens if you add facade=True ?
> sage: P = Poset( (range(len(p)), comparison), facade=True )
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group
Y !!!
> Merci pour les infos. C'est plutôt sur sage-combinat devel qu'il faut poster
> ce genre de truc... Je fais suivre.
Arg.. Oui, mais c'était pour écrire en francais et avoir des news au
passage ! ;-)
> Coincé au lit par la grippe :-(
Arg !!! Bon, j'espère que tu te sor
Hello everybody !!!
The french speakers who read the other post in this forum already know that
I am having a hard time with posets, and it may very well be my fault.
But come on Just look at that !!!
--
sage: Permutations(10).random_element()
[9, 2, 6, 7, 5, 4, 10, 8, 1, 3]
sage
Hell !!
Petit "rapport d'utilisation" sur les Posets :-D
Je viens de passer 30 minutes à chercher le pourquoi de ceci :
sage: inclusionwise_mininals(d)
---
ValueErrorTraceback (mos
Salut,
> Petit "rapport d'utilisation" sur les Posets :-D
Merci pour les infos. C'est plutôt sur sage-combinat devel qu'il faut poster
ce genre de truc... Je fais suivre.
> J'espère que ca roxxe au Canada
Coincé au lit par la grippe :-(
Florent
--
You received this message becau
