[sage-combinat-devel] trac_13243-new_methods_for_compositions-fs.patch

2012-07-19 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Franco, Is it possible that your patch under positive review in the sage-combinat queue trac_13243-new_methods_for_compositions-fs.patch breaks the queue for sage-5.2.rc0 due to an import error in /combinat/compositions.py. sage.categories.graded_enumerated_sets import GradedEnumeratedSets

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] doctest failures

2012-07-19 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Andrew and Martin, For me with all patches applied on sage-5.1, the tests for partition.py also pass! Anne On 7/19/12 6:58 PM, Andrew Mathas wrote: > Hi Martin, > > I am curious as to exactly what you did to get these doc test errors. Am I > right in thinking that you applied all of the pat

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] doctest failures

2012-07-19 Thread Andrew Mathas
Hi Martin, I am curious as to exactly what you did to get these doc test errors. Am I right in thinking that you applied all of the patches currently in the queue (hg qpush -a) and then ran all of the doc tests to get these failures? Which version of sage are you using? The reason that I am as

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] doctest failures

2012-07-19 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 2:45:09 PM UTC-7, Martin wrote: > > Anne Schilling writes: > > > Here are several *ideas*: > > > > * We should run daily tests on the "needs review" section and pop > patches > > off that section if the tests do not pass (or people are not actively > working >

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] doctest failures

2012-07-19 Thread Martin Rubey
Anne Schilling writes: > Here are several *ideas*: > > * We should run daily tests on the "needs review" section and pop patches > off that section if the tests do not pass (or people are not actively > working > on making them pass). > > * Everyone should try to get their patches into main-

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] doctest failures

2012-07-19 Thread Anne Schilling
Dear All! Given Martin's questions about the doc test failures on the queue and also some discussions I had last week at the Sage Days and by e-mail with Franco, perhaps we need to discuss some issues about the sage-combinat queue. First of all, the queue is meant for active development of code i

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] doctest failures

2012-07-19 Thread Martin Rubey
Anne Schilling writes: > Hi Martin, > > If you want to run tests on your own patch, I suggest to apply it to a clean > version of sage-5.2.rc0. All tests in a clean version of sage-5.2.rc0 should > pass! The ones that fail would then be due to your patch. Well, what I was doing depends on most o

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] doctest failures

2012-07-19 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Martin, If you want to run tests on your own patch, I suggest to apply it to a clean version of sage-5.2.rc0. All tests in a clean version of sage-5.2.rc0 should pass! The ones that fail would then be due to your patch. If you run sage -t on the sage-combinat queue, it is not guaranteed that t

[sage-combinat-devel] doctest failures

2012-07-19 Thread Martin Rubey
I just wanted to test whether some experimental changes wouldn't break anything and ran sage -t devel/sage-combinat/sage/combinat/ I get quite a few failures, ugly errors, etc. Which of these should I expect? eg. File "/groups/comb/rubey/sage-5.1/devel/sage-combinat/sage/combinat/subsets_pai

[sage-combinat-devel] Groups

2012-07-19 Thread Simon King
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/sage-devel/Ue5g73lN4KQ The topic is: How to represent groups in Sage. We would like to have an abstract group that is able to provide us with different realisations of itself (permutation presentation, fai