Hi All!
Andrew Mathas and I had to import the patches from ticket 11310 to the queue as
they touched /combinat/tableaux.py and conflicted with 9265. As a result the
following
patches did not apply any longer
trac_5512-species_equality.patch
alphabet-vd.patch
species_labels-mr.patch
concrete_comb
Hello Nicolas!
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> Hi Franco!
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:41:28PM -0400, Franco Saliola wrote:
>> I'm having trouble with (With)Realizations.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, then we have the following.
>>
>> - The methods in Cate
PS:
On 2012-08-16, Simon King wrote:
>>In other words "3 in Zmod(5)(3)" should
>> returns True but it returns an error.
>
> Zmod(5)(3) is by default considered as an element of a ring, not as a coset.
> Hence, of cource "3 in Zmod(5)(3)" returns an error. If you want a
> coset, i.e., if you want
Hi Vincent,
I'm sorry for my long answer. I am not a native speaker, so, it is
difficult for me to be concise in English.
On 2012-08-16, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This default behavior is very badly suited. In parallel to my second
> mail, I found the more striking ex
Thanks Simon.
> The default behaviour of "x in P" for any parent P in Sage is:
> x in P
> <=>
> P(x)==x is True (and does not raise an error)
This default behavior is very badly suited. In parallel to my second
mail, I found the more striking example
{{{
sage: R = Zmod(5)
sage: i = ZZ(3)
sage:
Dear Vincent,
On 2012-08-16, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It breaks many test in sage.combinat.*. Note that if we adopt the
> strict convention (ie int(2) not in Integers/IntegerRange/...) then it
> will be impossible to do the following
> {{{
> sage: W = Words("positive
Quick update : I really don't like the following (which comes from the
default sage.structure.parent.__contains__)
{{{
sage: Zmod(12)(5) in ZZ
True
}}}
2012/8/16, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on #8920 about factorization of codes between alphabets
> and sets
Hi,
I'm working on #8920 about factorization of codes between alphabets
and sets. I got problems with the following behavior::
{{{
sage: int(2) in IntegerRange(1,3)
False
sage: int(2) in Integers()
True
sage: int(2) in NonNegativeIntegers()
True
sage: int(2) in PositiveIntegers()
False
}}}
It brea
Hi Franco!
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:41:28PM -0400, Franco Saliola wrote:
> I'm having trouble with (With)Realizations.
>
> If I understand correctly, then we have the following.
>
> - The methods in Category.WithRealizations.ParentMethods are
> methods that are "inherited" by any obj
