On Friday, August 24, 2012 3:36:54 PM UTC-7, Andrew Mathas wrote:
>
>
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to remove functions from the global name
>> space with no warning. If they were already deprecated, sure, but if not:
>> deprecate them now, and remove them from the global name space in 6 m
I don't think it's a good idea to remove functions from the global name
> space with no warning. If they were already deprecated, sure, but if not:
> deprecate them now, and remove them from the global name space in 6 months
> or a year. I remember seeing "number_of_partitions" used in some Sa
Hi Nicolas, Dan,
On Thursday, 23 August 2012 11:43:27 UTC-4, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> As for the room for improvement, for Weyl character rings, but also
> for everything using root systems intensively, like Weyl groups and
> the like, a big spot is the optimization of CombinatorialFreeModul
On Friday, August 24, 2012 12:29:06 AM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:48:31PM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote:
> >Here, I think, is the complete list together with their recommended
> >replacements:
>
> Thanks! If no one has complained in, say, two days, plea
Hey Andrew,
I have no complaints. I've put myself down as the reviewer on the trac
ticket, so let me know when the patch is ready for a review.
Best,
Travis
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 5:11:03 PM UTC-7, Andrew Mathas wrote:
>
> I remembered that I did in fact discuss doing these deprecation
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:16:44PM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote:
>Could some one have a quick look a the patch #13259 at
>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13259.
>
>It is a very short patch which correctly implements negative quantum
>integers, which were previously defined
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:48:31PM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote:
>Here, I think, is the complete list together with their recommended
>replacements:
Thanks! If no one has complained in, say, two days, please go ahead.
>Looking again at the code, the function cyclic_permutations_of_parti
