Following the release of LattE Integrale 1.6 and 4ti2 1.6,
I've updated the 4ti2 spkg (trac #15172) and made an intial version of
LattE Integrale 1.6 spkg (trac #15180).
For the latter, one would still need to write an interface, but this
could produce a huge speedup for integer point counting in
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 07:07:13AM +, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Following the release of LattE Integrale 1.6 and 4ti2 1.6,
> I've updated the 4ti2 spkg (trac #15172) and made an intial version of
> LattE Integrale 1.6 spkg (trac #15180).
Thanks Dima!
> For the latter, one would still need to w
On Monday, September 9, 2013 8:07:13 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> For the latter, one would still need to write an interface, but this
> could produce a huge speedup for integer point counting in polytopes.
>
I'm pretty sure you can't improve the current code for small polytopes
(say, O(1
On 2013-09-09, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 07:07:13AM +, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> Following the release of LattE Integrale 1.6 and 4ti2 1.6,
>> I've updated the 4ti2 spkg (trac #15172) and made an intial version of
>> LattE Integrale 1.6 spkg (trac #15180).
>
> Thanks D
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 01:14:49PM +, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > Been dreaming of such an interface for a long while. Please someone!
>
> perhaps something for the forthcoming Sage Days 53?
Or Sage Days 54 in Davis in November, since the LattE team is strong
out there!
Cheers,
Hi,
I see that there is already an optional argument "maximality=False" in the
code of PairwiseCompatibleSubsets, but I don't see it used in the code -
and I actually vaguely remember Nicolas saying that this was not yet done.
I wonder if it would be hard to add the maximality feature to
Pairwise
