Re: [sage-combinat-devel] tensor products of free modules; combinatorial algebras

2014-02-16 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi Mark! On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:37:33AM -0500, Mark Shimozono wrote: > I kind of figured I would have to mess a little with free_module.py. > Using the secret flag is a good trick: low profile/overhead and does the job. Oups, this assertion check is indeed too restrictive (Mark: congr

[sage-combinat-devel] list papers citing sage!

2014-02-16 Thread Anne Schilling
Dear All! It's the time of the year when we need to report to our funding agencies. Please, if you have written papers that used sage or sage-combinat, post them at http://www.sagemath.org/library-publications-combinat.html (or respond to this e-mail to get them posted)! Thank you, Anne -- Y

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] tensor products of free modules; combinatorial algebras

2014-02-16 Thread Mark Shimozono
Nicolas, How does sage construct the tensor product of morphisms in the category of tensor products of modules with basis? If this construction doesn't already exist, then the abuse of the term "tensor functor" is disappointing. (Of course I'm glad to implement it.) --Mark -- You received this

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] sage-combinat poster

2014-02-16 Thread Anne Schilling
Dear All! A new version of the Sage-combinat poster can be found here: http://combinat.sagemath.org/misc/raw-file/653a573e1928/articles/2013-01-17-Poster/main2014.pdf It needs to be printed for the NSF by Tuesday, so please send any comments you might have as soon as possible. Best, Anne --