Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Skew partitions for symmetric functions

2015-09-14 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi Travis and Mike, I would also say (B). But why is skew_schur needed if the usual Schur function already takes a skew partition as an input? Best, Anne On 9/13/15 7:30 PM, Mike Zabrocki wrote: > Hi Travis, > > I would say that the skew partition input into bases (other than Schur > function

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Skew partitions for symmetric functions

2015-09-14 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey Mike, I would say that the skew partition input into bases (other than Schur > functions, and for Schurs the documentation is insufficient...see sf.html) > is undocumented and so the output should be suspect (and not what one would > hope). > > For Schur functions, I think the output is wha