Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Skew partitions for symmetric functions

2015-09-15 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
It also makes it much easier for the user to discover it (in fact, this time the user was me; it took examining the code for me to find this functionality in the first place). This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19218 and needing review. Best, Travis On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Skew partitions for symmetric functions

2015-09-15 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 07:00:11PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote: > I would also say (B). But why is skew_schur needed if the usual > Schur function already takes a skew partition as an input? It's a usual pattern: when a constructor/call function takes very different kinds of input, it can be nice