On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 07:00:11PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I would also say (B). But why is skew_schur needed if the usual
> Schur function already takes a skew partition as an input?
It's a usual pattern: when a constructor/call function takes very
different kinds of input, it can be nice to split out the
implementation of the various constructions into independent
functions. This cleanly separates the concerns between the dispatch
upon input and each construction.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
