On 2013-03-01, Simon King wrote:
> Hence, I think I will leave it at a partial cythonisation.
... which is #14214 and needs review.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
Hi Nicolas,
On 2013-03-01, Simon King wrote:
>> Altogether, I would aim toward having EndomorphismSubring only inherit
>> from the concrete class HomsetWithBase, unless it *really* needs some
>> of the speed critical methods of Ring. Or unless, in the short run, it
>> depends too much from stuff
Hi Nicolas,
On 2013-03-01, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> In principle +1 on cythoning homset.py. Note: homset.py is mostly
> pre-categories code written by non-combinat people; we want them to be
> involved in the discussion as they would have more insight.
So, ask sage-devel instead?
> Altogether
Hi Simon!
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 02:50:17PM +, Simon King wrote:
> On 2013-03-01, Simon King wrote:
> > Is there a reason why the
> > transition to Cython should be difficult? Note that @lazy_attribute
> > and @cached_method became available to .pyx files, if I am not mistaken.
> > S
Hi!
On 2013-03-01, Simon King wrote:
> Is there a reason why the
> transition to Cython should be difficult? Note that @lazy_attribute
> and @cached_method became available to .pyx files, if I am not mistaken.
> So, if such decorators where the only original reason to use Python, then
> I certain
