[sage-combinat-devel] Re: TestSuite and Realizations

2010-06-02 Thread Jason Bandlow
On 06/02/2010 01:29 PM, Florent Hivert wrote: The problem is that QS is a facade parent (that is its elements belongs to another parent). Right now TestSuite doesn't properly handles those. This is ticket #9065. Great, I looked briefly for such a ticket, but couldn't find it. Thanks for the

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: TestSuite and ...

2009-11-17 Thread Florent Hivert
     Dear Nicolas, I just spent/lost one hour on the following missfeature (at least in my opinion) of TestsSuite... Mind the ... ;-) Those dots are particularly heavy dots... Still don't get it ? Try    myself._test_my_reaction() ... done ? Anything happening ? No ? Really

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: TestSuite

2009-11-17 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Florent, dear Mike, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:49:06AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote: With the forthcoming bunch of sage-combinat patches, to test a parent we call sage: TestSuite(P).run() which by default returns nothing if everything is ok and raise an

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: TestSuite

2009-11-17 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 07:36:58AM -0800, William Stein wrote: I think it is ridiculous to have doctests of the form sage:sga = SymmetricGroup(3) sage: TestSuite(sga).run(verbose=True) running ._test_an_element() .. done running ._test_associativity() .. done

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: TestSuite and ...

2009-11-16 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr wrote:      Dear Nicolas, I just spent/lost one hour on the following missfeature (at least in my opinion) of TestsSuite... Mind the ... ;-) Those dots are particularly heavy dots... Still don't get it ? Try