On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 07:36:25AM -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
> Oops, E8(1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) has degree 3875. That could be slow.
:-)
> I think I probably meant to branch E8(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1) which
> is the standard representation having degree 248.
That one actually appears right after and takes jus
> I just ran each long test individually, and annotated them with how
> much time they took (on my macbook pro). They are indeed all below
> 30s, except for a big E8 test which takes 160s. I marked that one as
Oops, E8(1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) has degree 3875. That could be slow.
I think I probably meant
Hi Daniel!
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:32:25PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
> > The patch #5794 adds a lot of branching rules, and tests are provided
> > for most of these. I marked many of them long.
> >
> > I won't have time immediatel
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
>
>> 3) The time for weyl_characters.py to complete on -long has gone up
>> to 250s or so. I'm not sure if this is due to adding more expensive
>> tests or a speed regression. This currently runs twice as long as
>> any other single file on -lo
> 3) The time for weyl_characters.py to complete on -long has gone up
> to 250s or so. I'm not sure if this is due to adding more expensive
> tests or a speed regression. This currently runs twice as long as
> any other single file on -long.
The patch #5794 adds a lot of branching rules, and te
Dear Mike, dear Dan,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:25:41AM +0700, Mike Hansen wrote:
> I ran some tests with all of the category patches, and there are a few
> issues that need to be cleaned up before merging. Most of them only
> show up when doctesting with -long (the standard option when m
