On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:04:44PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
Since there were some nonlocal changes in sage-5.1, I think it would be best
if all
developers now switch to sage-5.2 and we focus our efforts on rebasing all
patches
to this new version of sage (instead of trying to keep
I have rebased 9265 so that it applies on 5.1 but I haven't uploaded it as
I wanted to rename it and make sure that I don't clobber anything else in
the 5.1 or 5.2 queues. The main problem is that even though the queue
applies on 5.2 sage does not run due -- so far -- to incorrect
Sorry, I have pushed the patch onto the queue and reinstated 9265 in the
series file. Please let me know if there are any problems.
Btw, on trac the patchbot is applying both the old patch and the new one.
Could some please tell me how I get it to ignore the old patch.
Cheers,
Andrew
On
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Andrew Mathas
andrew.mat...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Sorry, I have pushed the patch onto the queue and reinstated 9265 in the
series file. Please let me know if there are any problems.
Btw, on trac the patchbot is applying both the old patch and the new one.
Could
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Andrew Mathas
andrew.mat...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Sorry, I have pushed the patch onto the queue and reinstated 9265 in the
series file. Please let me know if there are any problems.
Btw,
I have rebased Jason's patch so that it apples to 5.2-rc0.
I also uploaded the new patch to trac, where I had to rename the patch as
trac would not give me permission to delete some one else's patch. The
patch probably won't apply cleanly to 5.2-rc0 for trivial reasons (white
space) as it
ps. I put a +5.2 guard on the patch
concrete_combinatorial_statistics_and_maps-cs.patch
as it didn't apply cleanly to files that I hadn't touched. (I also guarded
my patch trac_X-Kleshchev-partitions-am.patch which I forgot to do when
I uploaded it earlier).
Andrew
--
You received this
I also uploaded the new patch to trac, where I had to rename the patch as
trac would not give me permission to delete some one else's patch. The
patch probably won't apply cleanly to 5.2-rc0 for trivial reasons (white
space)
It should apply cleanly to 5.2. Assuming you fix that and repost
It should apply cleanly to 5.2. Assuming you fix that and repost it,
unfortunately, 9265 does not apply anymore on 5.1...
Best, Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To post to this group, send email to
Christian Stump wrote:
unfortunately, 9265 does not apply anymore on 5.1...
I think a lot of patches are broke on 5.1 right now. Here is a partial list.
trac_5457-review-as.patch
trac_9265_tableaux_categories_jb.patch
trac_12774-coxeter-ms.patch
Sorry, I forgot the guard for trac_5457-review-as.patch and just added it!
Anne
On 7/30/12 8:12 PM, Daniel Bump wrote:
Christian Stump wrote:
unfortunately, 9265 does not apply anymore on 5.1...
I think a lot of patches are broke on 5.1 right now. Here is a partial list.
Hi All!
Since there were some nonlocal changes in sage-5.1, I think it would be best if
all
developers now switch to sage-5.2 and we focus our efforts on rebasing all
patches
to this new version of sage (instead of trying to keep backwards compatibilty
for much longer).
Best,
Anne
On 7/30/12
Dear Dan and Christian,
I have rebased 9265 so that it applies on 5.1 but I haven't uploaded it as
I wanted to rename it and make sure that I don't clobber anything else in
the 5.1 or 5.2 queues. The main problem is that even though the queue
applies on 5.2 sage does not run due -- so far --
I just marked it as needs work. it needs a (trivial, hopefully) rebase
for Sage 5.2.rc0.
Dima
On Tuesday, 24 July 2012 10:19:56 UTC+8, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Hi Jason,
What is the status of your patch #9265? It is not marked as needing review
and I'd actually assumed it was already merged
14 matches
Mail list logo
