Hi Simon,
The following is a problem for my work at #18758, which aims at making
arithmetic operations faster that are defined via category
element/parent classes:
sage: Sym = SymmetricFunctions(FractionField(QQ['t']))
sage: ks3 = Sym.kschur(3)
sage: ks5 = Sym.kschur(5)
Hi!
The following is a problem for my work at #18758, which aims at making
arithmetic operations faster that are defined via category
element/parent classes:
sage: Sym = SymmetricFunctions(FractionField(QQ['t']))
sage: ks3 = Sym.kschur(3)
sage: ks5 = Sym.kschur(5)
sage: a =
Hi all,
I've been working on a major revamp of symmetric functions. It is possible
that the changes I have been making conflict with Martin's recent changes
to the `principle specialization` and have broken the queue.
They shouldn't technically interfere, but for some reason 'merge' wasn't
Hi Mike,
On 5/13/12 7:14 PM, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
I have been digging into Macdonald polynomials all this last week and every
time I think I have a way of cleaning up the problem, I scratch the surface
and another problem arises.
I'd like some advice about what should be going on behind
I have been digging into Macdonald polynomials all this last week and every
time I think I have a way of cleaning up the problem, I scratch the surface
and another problem arises.
I'd like some advice about what should be going on behind the scenes. I
know what behavior we would like to have.
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:29 PM, vasu tewari.v...@gmail.com wrote:
For example, SF computes ( the code's not in maple, just to give an
idea of the computation I was trying)
s=SFASchur(QQ)
s[14,14].itensor(s[14,13,1])
in no time . But it seems to take quite a lot of time on Sage. I
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:49:15PM -0500, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:45 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
What precisely is a shorthand? It seems like a bad name.
Maybe
sage: S.inject_elements()
or
sage: S.inject_special_elements()
or something?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:49:15PM -0500, Mike Hansen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:45 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
What precisely is a shorthand? It seems like a bad name.
Maybe
sage:
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:45 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
What precisely is a shorthand? It seems like a bad name.
Maybe
sage: S.inject_elements()
or
sage: S.inject_special_elements()
or something? Or maybe I misunderstand?
Typically, when one works with
Dear William, dear symmetric function fans,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:59:18PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
sage: sage.misc.misc.inject_variables(dict('a':1, 'b':3))
sage: a
1
sage: b
3
That sounds very good.
Up to little changes, patch up on #7776
Since we
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Dear William, dear symmetric function fans,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:59:18PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
sage: sage.misc.misc.inject_variables(dict('a':1, 'b':3))
sage: a
1
sage: b
Dear Sage-Combinat devs,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 07:42:21AM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
... about shorthands:
-
We have had repeated (and strong!) requests from users of symmetric
functions for a one liner for getting the usual shortcuts for all the
classical
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Dear Sage-Combinat devs,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 07:42:21AM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
... about shorthands:
-
We have had repeated (and strong!) requests from users of symmetric
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:01:22PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
I stumbled recently into a nifty feature of the IPython interpreter
allowing for easy manipulations of the global namespace of the
interpreter, at the python level. Thanks to it, one can now do:
sage: S =
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:01:22PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
I stumbled recently into a nifty feature of the IPython interpreter
allowing for easy manipulations of the global namespace of the
interpreter,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:37:22PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:01:22PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
I stumbled recently into a nifty feature of the IPython interpreter
allowing
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:37:22PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:01:22PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
Hi all
I am trying to do computations with symmetric functions over different
alphabets.
This seems to have been part of the SFA package, itself part of the mu-
EC package, itself considered a deprecated part of the MuPAD-combinat
package... (see
18 matches
Mail list logo
