Salut --
> okay, i will build alpha3 then and have a look.
It took me about 2 hours to solve the reject in posets.py, I now don't
know how to solve combinat/index.rst and poset_examples.py. So can
someone else take that over?
Best, Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscri
> I won't have time before next week, so please anyone feel free to take
> over.
okay, i will build alpha3 then and have a look.
Best, Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-c
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 02:37:31PM +0200, Christian Stump wrote:
> > errors during apply, please fix and refresh
> > trac_10998-categories-posets-nt.patch
>
> Maybe Nicolas can have a look at this, I do not run 4.7.2.alpha3, so I
> don't really know what to do to solve that!
I won't have time bef
Hi Anne,
> Thanks, but now I get another conflict (I am running sage-4.7.2.alpha3):
> errors during apply, please fix and refresh
> trac_10998-categories-posets-nt.patch
Maybe Nicolas can have a look at this, I do not run 4.7.2.alpha3, so I
don't really know what to do to solve that!
Best, Chri
Hi Christian,
Thanks, but now I get another conflict (I am running sage-4.7.2.alpha3):
applying trac_9534-permgroup_base.patch
applying trac_11003.patch
applying trac_11003-review-nt.patch
applying trac_8-finite_enumset_list_cache-fh.patch
applying trac_8-finite_enumset_list_cache-r
Hi Anne --
> Adding the patch #10530 which was merged in sage-4.7.2.alpha2 to the
> sage-combinat
> queue, now gives a conflict with your patch
sorry that it took a while - i was waiting that someone solves the
reject in trac_10335-permgroup_domain-mh.patch. (It broke everywhere,
but I didn't fig
Hi Christian,
Adding the patch #10530 which was merged in sage-4.7.2.alpha2 to the
sage-combinat
queue, now gives a conflict with your patch
applying trac_11010-subword_complex-cs.patch
patching file sage/combinat/all.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 119
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file sa
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 07:02:53AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> On 9/30/11 12:11 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 05:24:32PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> >>I just had to rebase the patch trac_11742-cores-as.patch for
> >>sage-4.7.2.alpha3. Some code on debruijn sequences
On 9/30/11 12:11 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 05:24:32PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
I just had to rebase the patch trac_11742-cores-as.patch for
sage-4.7.2.alpha3. Some code on debruijn sequences must have been
merged into sage, which is not on the sage-combinat queue,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 05:24:32PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I just had to rebase the patch trac_11742-cores-as.patch for
> sage-4.7.2.alpha3. Some code on debruijn sequences must have been
> merged into sage, which is not on the sage-combinat queue, which
> created a conflict.
>
> Unfortunat
Hi!
I just had to rebase the patch trac_11742-cores-as.patch for
sage-4.7.2.alpha3. Some code on debruijn sequences must have been
merged into sage, which is not on the sage-combinat queue, which
created a conflict.
Unfortunately now the patch does not apply anymore to sage-4.7.1.
I am not sure
11 matches
Mail list logo
