Hi Mark,
I was just looking at your coxeter_ms patch. Here are some remarks:
- apply_demazure_product takes either an element or a reduced word.
-- Is it clear that different words for an element produce the same
Demazure product?
-- why do you want the word to be reduced; I constantly use the
De
Christian,
Thanks very much for having a look!
> - apply_demazure_product takes either an element or a reduced word.
> -- Is it clear that different words for an element produce the same
> Demazure product?
There is some flag variety geometry which implies this directly.
For a more hands-on pro
Hi Mark --
> But the braid relation describes the long element of the
> dihedral group generated by s1 and s2, so by the above length-additivity,
> s1 (s2 s1 s2) will act the same way as s2 s1 s2.
Thanks for providing a detailed proof, it might be worth having a
reference in the source code, so p
Hi guys,
It's good to see ongoing discussions on Coxeter groups and
friends. Keep it up!
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:50:56PM +0200, Christian Stump wrote:
>
> if hasattr(element,"parent") and element.parent() is self.parent():
Just a variant:
if self.is_parent_of(element):
Christian,
I just pushed a version of my patch that takes into account
what you and Nicolas said.
Please proceed with the rebasing etc. Thanks for doing this!
--Mark
P.S. I can't promise that my code is entirely speedy, only that
it is not extravagantly wasteful.
> my patch on the Demazure pro
Hi,
> I just pushed a version of my patch that takes into account
> what you and Nicolas said.
>
> Please proceed with the rebasing etc. Thanks for doing this!
I moved your patch coxeter_ms up above my patch on subword complexes,
where I need the Demazure product.
I had to do some rebasing, so p
Christian,
Thanks for moving my patch up and rebasing.
> Have you created a ticket for this patch already? Could you then add a
> comment at #11122 that says that this ticket got merged into yours --
> thanks!
I created a ticket: #12774.
My patch on the sage-combinat queue is now trac_12774-coxe
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:01:26AM -0400, msh...@math.vt.edu wrote:
> I added the comment on #11122 but don't know how to change its
> status to "already done" or whatever it should be.
From:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/trac.html#reasons-to-invalidate-tickets
«change the status of the
Christian and Nicolas,
I put my one rejected text hunk in a slightly different place
(not quite at the very bottom)
and the rest of the queue applies! Zero doctest failures at my patch.
Only a few when the entire queue is applied, and I saw all of these
same failures when my patch was the last to
> I put my one rejected text hunk in a slightly different place
> (not quite at the very bottom)
I don't understand what you mean -- into another patch below in the
queue or somewhere else in the py file?
> May I push my changes to the sage-combinat server?
> I will wait until I have an affirmati
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:43:08PM +0200, Christian Stump wrote:
> Just push it, if that doesn't create some conflict. Then I can see
> what you mean above.
+1
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because yo
11 matches
Mail list logo
