Hi Simon!
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 08:05:32AM +, Simon King wrote:
> Working on path algebras, which inherit from CombinatorialFreeModule, I
> found that CombinatorialFreeModule makes specific assumptions on
> implementation details of the elements of a module.
>
> What I mean is, for
Hi Bruce,
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 06:50:35AM -0700, Bruce wrote:
>While I am here: I am constructing an infinite dimensional representation
>of an algebra.
>This means the next step for me is to construct operators on this vector
>space (one for each integer)
>and these
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 08:04:11AM -0700, Bruce wrote:
>On Friday, 16 May 2014 14:54:32 UTC+1, Viviane Pons wrote:
>
> I think the Foo class must also inherit from the Element class.
>
>If I change the first line to
>
>class Foo(Element, UniqueRepresentation):
>
>then when
Thanks Anne. This implements an algebra. I want to have a vector space with
basis
and then construct some operators. Mathematically, this is a module for the
affine Temperley-Lieb algebra.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
On Friday, 16 May 2014 14:54:32 UTC+1, Viviane Pons wrote:
>
> I think the Foo class must also inherit from the Element class.
>
If I change the first line to
class Foo(Element, UniqueRepresentation):
then when I create an instance and look at it I get
Generic element of a structure
--
You
Hi Bruce,
You can check in
sage/src/sage/algebras/affine_nil_temperley_lieb.py
where the affine nilTemperley Lieb algebra was already implemented.
Best,
Anne
On 5/16/14 6:50 AM, Bruce wrote:
> I am trying to construct formal linear combinations of instances of a
> particular class.
> I have
I think the Foo class must also inherit from the Element class.
Viviane
2014-05-16 15:50 GMT+02:00 Bruce :
> I am trying to construct formal linear combinations of instances of a
> particular class.
> I have asked about this before and, I think, was given the following
> template
>
>
> class Fo
Hi,
I have just pushed my last changes. I'm using both facades and
representations as we discussed. Still two issues :
- the is_parent_of method checks only one level and I would need it to
check all levels
- the problem we discussed already that the category dosen't overwrite
the default parent
Hi Viviane!
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 03:42:55PM +0200, Viviane Pons wrote:
> I was seeing it the other way arround : the concrete parents giving
> their facade parents.
I see.
> This is the way it has to work for me, so actually, I can't use the
> "facade" parameter in parents as I don't
I was seeing it the other way arround : the concrete parents giving
their facade parents. This is the way it has to work for me, so
actually, I can't use the "facade" parameter in parents as I don't
know which are the concrete parents when I create the facade.
thank's anyway
2010/9/27 Nicolas M.
Hi Viviane,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:03:27AM +0200, Viviane Pons wrote:
> I would like to send the "facade" init parameter to a
> CombinatorialFreeModule, but it's not supported whereas it is for
> Parent. Should I create a ticket and fix that ?
A CombinatorialFreeModule provides a conc
Hi Bruce,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:33:21AM -0700, Bruce wrote:
> I am trying to construct the fee module on the set of instances of a
> class G.
> I start with
>
> M = CombinatorialFreeModule(QQ,G)
>
> If f,g are instances of G I then continue with
>
> a = M.monomial(f)
> b = M.monomial
12 matches
Mail list logo