William Stein wrote:
> I've posted a release candidate for sage-2.4 here:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/rc/
>
> It would be helpful if a few people would build this and, if that works,
> do a "make test", and let me know what happens. I will make an
> official release someti
> Problems with linbox c-library wrapper?
Hi,
could you tell me:
What OS you are using, distribution etc.
Which BLAS you have installed if any
What ldd returns
Thanks,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_www: http://www.i
Martin Albrecht wrote:
>> Problems with linbox c-library wrapper?
>
> Hi,
>
> could you tell me:
> What OS you are using, distribution etc.
> Which BLAS you have installed if any
> What ldd returns
>
>
Fedora Core 5:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.4.rc2]$ uname -a
Linux paix.jaapspies.nl 2.6
This link gives information on the methods used by Magma
http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/magma/htmlhelp/text565.htm
If I computed correctly then none of -1, -2, -3, -7, or -11
are quadratic residues mod p. Hence it seems Magma used the
standard linear sieve in this example. This is what
http://ww
here is some behaviour i find rather weird.
In [76]: w1,w2=QQ['w1,w2'].gens()
now as i see it, w1 is a polynomial in one variable. indeed:
In [77]: w1.variables()
Out[77]: [w1]
however,
In [78]: w1(1)
: x must be of correct length
whereas
In [79]: w1(1,1)
Out[79]: 1
succeeds. i see why i
After fixing that linkerror at least locally for me, make test passes for rc3.
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb
_jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~-
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> After fixing that linkerror at least locally for me, make test passes for rc3.
>
There were no problems what so ever with sage-2.4.rc3 on FC5:
--
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 1093.9 second
Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> There were no problems what so ever with sage-2.4.rc3 on FC5:
> --
> All tests passed!
> Total time for all tests: 1093.9 seconds
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.4.rc3]$
>
The same for Fedora Core 6.
Jaap
-
All tests passed on suse 10.2 amd 64 bit.
Jaap Spies wrote:
> Jaap Spies wrote:
>
>> There were no problems what so ever with sage-2.4.rc3 on FC5:
>> --
>> All tests passed!
>> Total time for all tests: 1093.9 seconds
>> [EMAIL
On 3/25/07, Kyle Schalm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here is some behaviour i find rather weird.
>
> In [76]: w1,w2=QQ['w1,w2'].gens()
>
> now as i see it, w1 is a polynomial in one variable. indeed:
>
> In [77]: w1.variables()
> Out[77]: [w1]
No, it is a polynomial in two variables. What it "is
If X and Y are sets, then the __xor__ operator (X ^ Y) returns the
intersection of X and Y. The carat is reflects the mathematical
notation for the intersection of sets, but XOR really corresponds to
the symmetric difference. A person from a mathematics backround would
be inclined to think that
Thanks for all your feedback. It looks like a release of sage-2.4 is imminent!
On 3/25/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All tests passed on suse 10.2 amd 64 bit.
>
>
> Jaap Spies wrote:
> > Jaap Spies wrote:
> >
> >> There were no problems what so ever with sage-2.4.rc3 on FC5:
>
> If X and Y are sets, then the __xor__ operator (X ^ Y) returns the
> intersection of X and Y. The carat is reflects the mathematical
> notation for the intersection of sets, but XOR really corresponds to
> the symmetric difference. A person from a mathematics backround would
> be inclined to t
I actually have patches for differences and symmetric differences
almost all ready to go. I can have them done in the next little bit
if you want to get it in 2.4
On 3/25/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If X and Y are sets, then the __xor__ operator (X ^ Y) returns the
> > int
Here's the patch for set differences and symmetric differences. I've
made it so that the operators all match up with the ones for Python's
set()s.
--Mike
On 3/25/07, Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually have patches for differences and symmetric differences
> almost all ready to g
I've build sage-2.4-rc3 on my machine:
(Gentoo/Linux 2.6.20.4 x86 AMD Duron)
Al test were also passed.
Also I've installes the optional packages gap_packages and database_gap
without problems
best regards
Pablo
On 3/25/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for all your feed
I've found an inconsistency in Picewise doc string:
Currently Picewise? shows the following docstring
Docstring:
list_of_pairs is a list of pairs (fcn,I), where fcn is
a SAGE function (such as a polynomial over RR, or functions
using the lambda notation), and
On Mar 25, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
> Yi,
>
> I'm completely new to parallel algorithms. I'm doing a computation
> on sage.math right now, and it's very modular-- it involves a large
> number of independent computations. What can I do to take advantage
> of this?
Use DSage.
I installed 2.4-rc3 on a powerpc g4 powerbook. I had 4 tests fail,
but it looked like that was because I didn't install the gap
packages. The four failures were:
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/graphs/graph.py
sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/graphs/graph_isom.py
sage -t dev
I've installed the gap packages _after_ doing the tests.
Pablo
On 3/25/07, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I installed 2.4-rc3 on a powerpc g4 powerbook. I had 4 tests fail,
> but it looked like that was because I didn't install the gap
> packages. The four failures were:
>
>
Can you send the part of SAGE_ROOT/test.log that describes
the failures for
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/graphs/graph.py
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/graphs/graph_isom.py
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup.py
The dft.py is just a rounding rand
Build (for rc3) went fine on my machine (32 bit MacBook Pro, OS X
10.4.9)
real61m23.087s
user38m43.449s
sys 15m50.664s
Make test:
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 1732.5 seconds
David
On Mar 25, 5:52 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you send the part of
As I mentioned, they were all due to the lack of the gap packages.
After installing those 2 optional packages, everything is fine:
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 3473.6 seconds
-twice the time of the MacBook Pro, I'm jealous...
Do you still want to see the logs?
-Marshall
On Mar
On 3/25/07, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As I mentioned, they were all due to the lack of the gap packages.
> After installing those 2 optional packages, everything is fine:
>
> All tests passed!
> Total time for all tests: 3473.6 seconds
>
> -twice the time of the MacBook Pro, I'm jea
OK, I will directly email you the whole test.log since I don't know
how to attach it in the group interface. I first loaded the
gap_packages-4.4.9 and ran 'make test' again, and then I installed the
database_gap-4.4.9 package and tried again.
-Marshall
On Mar 25, 6:40 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAI
David -- please forward the following to the list.
On 3/25/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments below. I am ccing Wiliam Stein, so I did not trim the
> email from Alexander as much as I might ordinarily.
>
>
> On 3/25/07, Alexander Konovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear A
>
> The definition of variables is that it returns the "list of variables
> ocuring in the poly". If that determined whether the poly
> were in 1 or 2 variables, then it would, e.g. be impossible to
> even define a constant polynomial -- since it wouldn't be
> a polynomial.
i see. makes more
Hi,
I've released SAGE-2.4.
Thanks to everybody who helped with build testing on rc3! That's by
far the most people who have ever helped with rc build testing.
Here's the high-level change log. Thanks to everybody who contributed
code (especially the new contributors Gregory Bard, B Antieau,
Hi Pablo,
Thanks for the report. If you want this fixed, please send William or
me a patch. You can find information about patching on the SAGE
website, if it's back up. If you're not interested in patching this,
I'll try to remember to get it into the TRAC at some point.
Nick
On Mar 25, 11:
Congrats!
> * r miller: open source 'nauty' -- the first every open source
> implementation of Brendan McKay's isomorphism algorithm
Robert, could you say a few words about this? I think this is very
important to a certain class of mathematician, so it'd be nice if
On 3/25/07, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Pablo,
>
> Thanks for the report. If you want this fixed, please send William or
> me a patch. You can find information about patching on the SAGE
> website, if it's back up. If you're not interested in patching this,
> I'll try to re
All tests passed on ubuntu 6.0.6. with sage-2.4-rc3.
On Mar 24, 11:06 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've posted a release candidate for sage-2.4 here:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/tmp/rc/
>
> It would be helpful if a few people would build this and, if that work
This is strange: SAGE crashes on input that mixes shifting and mpfr
reals
{{{
sage: # mpz, mpfr
sage: 1<<3 +1.2
Segmentation fault
}}}
But note that this is fine:
{{{
# mpfr, mpz
sage: 2.0 + 1<<3
24.0
}}}
Anyone knows what's happening?
--~--~-~--~~~---~
> To David Kohel: index calculus for discrete logs uses linear algebra mod p-1
> (not 2).
Yes, I overstated the similarities between factorization and dlogs.
--David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsub
Hello,
I've created a VMware SAGE appliance, which I've put here:
http://www.sagemath.org/SAGEbin/vmware/
If anybody tries it out, please let me know what you think. In
particular, I'm interested in hearing from MS Windows users.
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
Unive
Hello,
Something went wrong with the hard drive on sage.math.washington.edu,
which will require a reboot to fix. I'll do that tomorrow morning.
In the meantime,
everybody's home directories are mounted read only.
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http
36 matches
Mail list logo
