[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-20 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Nov 20, 2007 11:44 PM, Stephen Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 20, 2007 2:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > > > Because then you can > > > use the syntax: > > > > > > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi)) > > > > > > for multiple integ

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8.13.rc1

2007-11-20 Thread mabshoff
Hello, one last email from me: I have opened tickets for all known remaining issues: 15:06 Ticket #1229 (defect) created by mabshoff 2.8.13.rc1: sage/calculus/calculus.py doctest failure 15:03 Ticket #1228 (defect) created by mabshoff 2.8.13.rc1: sage/rings/arith.py doctest failure 15:01

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-20 Thread Stephen Forrest
On Nov 20, 2007 2:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > Because then you can > > use the syntax: > > > > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi)) > > > > for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's just a cosmetic issue. > > When I commended Sage's syntax I was ass

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8.13.rc1

2007-11-20 Thread mabshoff
And more trouble on OSX 10.4 PPC. This is still with rc0, but the issues should still be present in rc1: cvxopt has trouble importing some g95 symbols. I need to investigate this. michael-abshoffs-ibook-g4:~/Desktop/sage-2.8.13.rc0 mabshoff$ ./sage - t devel/sage-main/sage/numerical/test.py sag

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-20 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Nov 20, 2007 8:17 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As to syntax, I think in Python we could use: > > > >>> integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2)) > > > Because then you can > > > use the syntax: > > > >

[sage-devel] Re: ModularSymbols(GammaH)

2007-11-20 Thread Iftikhar Burhanuddin
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, William Stein wrote: > On Nov 20, 2007 9:52 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote: > > Sage raises an exception when computing ModularSymbols for the congruence > > subgroup Gamma_H(N) of weight 2. Is this a bug? > > Yes. Report it on trac. This will actually probably be pretty har

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8.13.rc1

2007-11-20 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 20, 9:42 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED] dortmund.de> wrote: > One more thing: > > The cremona/homspace doctest still prints "transposing " - I > assume that code is in the library itself. > And some more datapoints: - devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8.13.rc1

2007-11-20 Thread mabshoff
One more thing: The cremona/homspace doctest still prints "transposing " - I assume that code is in the library itself. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8.13.rc1

2007-11-20 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 20, 9:06 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mabshoff wrote: > > rc1->rc0 > > > Tarball is at > > >http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.13.rc1.tar > > [165MB] > > Hi Michael > > > - updated cython to 0.9.6.9 > > - fixed the creomna.homespace issue on OSX 10.4 > >

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8.13.rc1

2007-11-20 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > rc1->rc0 > > Tarball is at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.13.rc1.tar > [165MB] > Hi Michael > - updated cython to 0.9.6.9 > - fixed the creomna.homespace issue on OSX 10.4 > - merged #991, #1122, #1188, #1196, #1215 > > I waited for the OSX 10.4

[sage-devel] sage 2.8.13.rc1

2007-11-20 Thread mabshoff
rc1->rc0 Tarball is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/sage-2.8.13.rc1.tar [165MB] - updated cython to 0.9.6.9 - fixed the creomna.homespace issue on OSX 10.4 - merged #991, #1122, #1188, #1196, #1215 I waited for the OSX 10.4 build to finish on a G4 iBook and that took a while.

[sage-devel] Re: ModularSymbols(GammaH)

2007-11-20 Thread William Stein
On Nov 20, 2007 9:52 AM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Gamma_H(N) are SL_2(Z) matrices where the lower left entry is > congruent to 0 mod N, and the upper left and lower right entries are > elements of a specified subgroup H of (Z/N)^*. > > Sage raises an except

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-20 Thread William Stein
On Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As to syntax, I think in Python we could use: > > >>> integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2)) > > Because then you can > > use the syntax: > > > > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi)) > > > > for multiple integral

[sage-devel] Re: Sage math app

2007-11-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As to syntax, I think in Python we could use: > >>> integrate(cos(x), (x, -pi/2, pi/2)) > Because then you can > use the syntax: > > integrate(cos(x*y), (x, -pi/2, pi/2), (y, 0, pi)) > > for multiple integrals. But anyway, it's just a cosmetic issue. When I commended Sage's syntax I was ass

[sage-devel] ModularSymbols(GammaH)

2007-11-20 Thread Iftikhar Burhanuddin
Hi folks, Gamma_H(N) are SL_2(Z) matrices where the lower left entry is congruent to 0 mod N, and the upper left and lower right entries are elements of a specified subgroup H of (Z/N)^*. Sage raises an exception when computing ModularSymbols for the congruence subgroup Gamma_H(N) of weight 2. I

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8.13.rc0

2007-11-20 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > > Hi Machael, > On Nov 20, 4:11 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> mabshoff wrote: > >> My Fedora 8 build is still running. I'll report shortly. >> > > Cool, rc1 is coming up in about two hours. If nothing turns up we will > release tonight. > FWIW: MY FC8 machi

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8.13.rc0

2007-11-20 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 20, 4:11 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mabshoff wrote: > > On Linux paix 2.6.23.1-21.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Nov 1 21:09:24 EDT 2007 i686 i686 > i386 GNU/Linux > builds, but: > -- > The following tests failed: > >

[sage-devel] Re: sage 2.8.13.rc0

2007-11-20 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > rc0 compiles "out of the box" on OSX 10.5 and on sage.math and passes > testall. I am currently building on OSX 10.4 PPC to see if I can > reproduce the issue William had with the g0n wrapper. > > Cheers, > > Michael > > alpha1->rc0: > > Tarball is at > > h

[sage-devel] Re: writing a new class

2007-11-20 Thread Jason Grout
David Roe wrote: > This is one of the things I'd been planning on adding to the new > programming guide. > > Your issue is that you're creating a new directory. When you do that, > you have to add that directory to the list of packages at the bottom of > setup.py in sage-root/devel/sage-branc

[sage-devel] sage 2.8.13.rc0

2007-11-20 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, rc0 compiles "out of the box" on OSX 10.5 and on sage.math and passes testall. I am currently building on OSX 10.4 PPC to see if I can reproduce the issue William had with the g0n wrapper. Cheers, Michael alpha1->rc0: Tarball is at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/s

[sage-devel] Re: writing a new class

2007-11-20 Thread David Roe
This is one of the things I'd been planning on adding to the new programming guide. Your issue is that you're creating a new directory. When you do that, you have to add that directory to the list of packages at the bottom of setup.pyin sage-root/devel/sage-branch/ You should also put an __init__

[sage-devel] Re: writing a new class

2007-11-20 Thread David Harvey
On Nov 20, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a simple question: I'm trying to write a new class in a new > file. > How do I get that file to show up in Sage? In this case, I'm trying > to write a menu.py file under the sage/server/notebook/widgets > directory

[sage-devel] writing a new class

2007-11-20 Thread Jason Grout
Hi everyone, I have a simple question: I'm trying to write a new class in a new file. How do I get that file to show up in Sage? In this case, I'm trying to write a menu.py file under the sage/server/notebook/widgets directory (a new directory). But when starting up SAGE with sage -br, it