On May 11, 6:39 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Jason Grout
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> On Sat, 10 May 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> >>> Currently CDF and RDF matrices wrap GSL matrices and use GSL algo
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 10 May 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>>> Currently CDF and RDF matrices wrap GSL matrices and use GSL algorithms
>>> for part of the computations. After talking with a few lead d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 10 May 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> Currently CDF and RDF matrices wrap GSL matrices and use GSL algorithms
>> for part of the computations. After talking with a few lead developers
>> on IRC, it seems that the consensus is that numpy is generally bet
On May 9, 1:24 pm, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 9, 3:25 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've posted a patch to the trac server with some documentation changes
> > along these lines:
>
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3145
>
> Just a question from th
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Currently CDF and RDF matrices wrap GSL matrices and use GSL algorithms
> for part of the computations. After talking with a few lead developers
> on IRC, it seems that the consensus is that numpy is generally better
> and has a much, much stronger
Yi Qiang wrote:
> Are there going to be any API incompatibilities going to be introduced
> by this move? That is, will existing code written against RDF and CDF
> matrices still "just work"?
My hope is that we will just replace the backend and the underlying code
and the user-interface function
Are there going to be any API incompatibilities going to be introduced
by this move? That is, will existing code written against RDF and CDF
matrices still "just work"?
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Currently CDF and RDF matrices wrap GSL matrices and
Currently CDF and RDF matrices wrap GSL matrices and use GSL algorithms
for part of the computations. After talking with a few lead developers
on IRC, it seems that the consensus is that numpy is generally better
and has a much, much stronger community. What do people think of moving
the RDF
Hi,
There is a new version of PiScript. If you've never
heard of it, check it out below.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bill Casselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, May 10, 2008 at 3:16 PM
Subject: PiScript update
To: Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: David Austin <[EMAIL
Okay, I will not bother submitting the flintqs package to Debian,
since it sounds like things may move to flint entirely before the SAGE
package makes it into Debian upstream anyway.
-Tim Abbott
On May 8, 10:02 am, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new quadratic sieve included
On May 8, 5:46 am, Clement Pernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rumors are always true!
> I meant to merge linbox_wrap in linbox/interfaces for the 2.0 linbox
> release. Depending on how urgent is your need for this to happen, I may
> consider doing it in a 1.1.6 release instead.
What's the times
On May 10, 8:21 pm, Francesco Biscani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Bill,
Hi Francesco,
> may I ask what your take on language bindings for mpir is? I think it
> would be important to be able to use it from C++, Python, Ruby, etc. I
> would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bill,
may I ask what your take on language bindings for mpir is? I think it
would be important to be able to use it from C++, Python, Ruby, etc. I
would certainly be glad to help in such an effort.
Best regards,
~ Francesco.
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
Hi,
Bug day 12 is on! http://wiki.sagemath.org/bug12/
Please drop by irc and fix a bug.I'm working on the
notebook bugs listed here:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/bug12/notebook
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-
In keeping with the "just do it" style of consensus building, I wrote up
a page describing an early view of distributed computing and Sage.
Forgive the tone which reads like I have standing in the Sage
community... its a hard habit to break and I didn't want to waste a lot
of time wordsmithing..
15 matches
Mail list logo
