Hello Sage developers,
I am one of the developers of the Python package SciTools
(http://scitools.googlecode.com) and for some time I have seen that
there is a package for SciTools in the experimental section in Sage.
The package is called scitools++ and it includes not only SciTools,
but also
Hi,
Please comment on the document http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dhh86c47_49dn2848s9
Igor's tests for @interact are at
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8103/home/pub/1536/
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:29 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 27, 2:23 pm, Igor Tolkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{{{
sage: GF(241^2, 'a')(1).minpoly()
x + 240
sage: GF(241, 'a')(1).minpoly()
---
AttributeErrorTraceback (most recent call
last)
...
AttributeError: 'sage.rings.integer_mod.IntegerMod_int'
Yes, I ran into that too. I don't much like the fact that elements of
GF(p^n) have different types depending on whether n=1 or n1, neither
type is a specialisation of the other.
I suggest opening a ticket but making it wider, namely to unify the
user interfaces for the different finite field
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, John Cremona wrote:
Yes, I ran into that too. I don't much like the fact that elements of
GF(p^n) have different types depending on whether n=1 or n1, neither
type is a specialisation of the other.
I suggest opening a ticket but making it wider, namely to unify the
2008/9/3 Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, John Cremona wrote:
Yes, I ran into that too. I don't much like the fact that elements of
GF(p^n) have different types depending on whether n=1 or n1, neither
type is a specialisation of the other.
I suggest opening a
On Sep 3, 10:46 am, Arnaud Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Arnaud,
hg diff in spkg/base gives the diff at the bottom in a just-extracted
sage-3.1.2.alpha4. Should this repository be ignored or is this just
an oversight?
Oops, those scripts get copied from the local/bin repo and are
I'm forwarding this entry from trac#3999 to sage-devel so it gets a
wider readership.
I certainly agree that the main abelian groups implementation in
Sage should be based on (additive) Z-modules. Then this wrapper idea
would be the way to go to implement multiplcative notation. But
that's
John,
I just ran into this problem and, while searching for a solution,
found this post. I don't know if you eventually got it to work, but
it turns out that the solution (under Ubuntu) is to install the
package texlive-lang-cyrillic (probably because of Sha).
Not quite Klingon, but almost :)
John Cremona wrote:
On another point, how exactly did you merge a whole sequence of
patches into one? I tried that using a very error-prone manual way
(create newclone, copy all files which I know have changed under the
patch sequence from oldclone to newclone, then commit). I'm sure you
Hi sage-devel,
At this time, Sage prints number field ideals in two-generator form.
There are good reasons for this, perhaps most notably that this is a
normal form best suited for visual inspection.
For most of the things I do, I don't care exactly what ideal I have: I
would be
Hi,
I noticed quite bad random behaviour when passing strings as argument,
check this simple example attached below, when passing numbers all is
ok, but on strings it just works crazy, if there is some other way to
pass string to R interpreter, is there way to do this automatically?
On bottom
Hello,
I noticed quite bad random behaviour when passing strings as argument,
check this simple example attached below, when passing numbers all is
ok, but on strings it just works crazy, if there is some other way to
pass string to R interpreter, is there way to do this automatically?
To
Just noticed one thing, during close (by ctrl+c) of sage that run
notebook (with sage --notebook) I got unhandled error (it's 100%
reproducible for me):
2008-09-04 02:30:56+0200 [-] Saving notebook...
2008-09-04 02:30:56+0200 [-] Dumping admin history to 'sage_notebook/
worksheets/
Thanks for info it indeed works that way! (I allowed myself to add
this and link to this ticked to FAQ at http://wiki.sagemath.org/R - I
hope it's OK) :)
cheers,
Andrzej.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
In German from heise.de:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/MuPAD-verschwindet-aber-nur-als-Produktname--/meldung/115390
the gist:
* MuPAD will only be sold until September 28th 2008
* MuPAD (Pro) licenses will remain valid
* MuPAD will be available as part of the symbolic Matlab toolbox
*
On Sep 3, 5:25 pm, Nick Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi sage-devel,
So I'd like opinions on two things:
1) changing the printing of number field ideals, and
2) changing the hash key of a residue field K/I to not reference I
directly, but instead the map K - K/I.
I assume that you
On Sep 3, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
Hi sage-devel,
At this time, Sage prints number field ideals in two-generator form.
There are good reasons for this, perhaps most notably that this is a
normal form best suited for visual inspection.
For most of the things I do, I don't
On Sep 3, 2:37 am, Johannes Ring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Sage developers,
Hi Johannes,
I am one of the developers of the Python package SciTools
(http://scitools.googlecode.com) and for some time I have seen that
there is a package for SciTools in the experimental section in Sage.
Hi,
I've made simple preliminary patch - http://giniu.ravenlord.ws/r_source.patch
- that allows to display source code of R functions in notebook using
standard ??, just I don't know if approach I used is good - today I've
seen content of sage/server directory for the first time so I cannot
be
libm4ri does not build on OS X 10.5 ppc
See
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4059
for details.
I can do the OS X ppc part, (and even then it would need testing on
10.4 and G4s), but I have no idea about Solaris on Sparcs.
I should build alphas more often.
21 matches
Mail list logo
