Looks like we're getting closer.
In the file "README.txt" in the toplevel directory of the Sage source
dist
it is said:
OS X: Make sure you have XCode version >= 2.4, i.e., gcc -v
should output build >= 5363. If you don't, go to
http://developer.apple.com/ s
On Sep 8, 2008, at 2:00 PM, John Cremona wrote:
> To me it sounds very complicated to keep a memory of what string a
> real number was first created with... but Sage already does a lot of
> complicated things!
Wasn't too hard to do, anyone want to review?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/tick
Rajanikanth Jammalamadaka wrote:
Hi Rajanikanth,
> STAGE 2-1-5: GEMV TUNE
> make -f Makefile INSTALL_LOG/dMVRES pre=d 2>&1 | ./xatlas_tee
> INSTALL_LOG/dMVTUNE.LOG
> make[3]: *** [build] Error 255
> make[3]: Leaving directory
Somehow the compiler segfaults. I guess it could be an overheating CP
STAGE 2-1-5: GEMV TUNE
make -f Makefile INSTALL_LOG/dMVRES pre=d 2>&1 | ./xatlas_tee
INSTALL_LOG/dMVTUNE.LOG
make[3]: *** [build] Error 255
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/rajanikanth/Desktop/Downloads/sage-3.1.1/spkg/build/atlas-3.8.1.p3/ATLAS-build'
make[2]: *** [build] Error 2
make[2]: Lea
Hello folks,
after the not so great rc0 this one will hopefully work a lot better.
Most issues beside ghmm and hmm should be fixed. PolyBoRi should
actually be working and not create random-ish segfaults at exit. We
also fixed the notebook in secure mode and most of the critical or
blocker notebo
> On a related note, recently I wrote a simple loop that went something like
> this:
>
> while abs(err) < 1e-6:
> ...
>
> The most expensive part of the operation, by far, was computing
> RealNumber('1e-6') in every iteration of the loop. What would people think
> about pulling such constants
On Sep 8, 7:42 pm, Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One additional consideration is that it is useful in this case to know
> whether an expression is constant, as a performance consideration.
> The regular algorithm works (slowly) on constant input, but it's
> faster if we can just sh
Looking at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3980, I formed
the opinion that a lot of times where .variables() or .arguments() is
used, it may be a mistake.
On that ticket, it was pointed out that find_root(sin,-1,1) throws an
error. Maybe this is a bug, maybe not, but in any case,
plot(
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>>
>> There is a patch up at
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/4036/trac_4036-2.patch
>> which improves conversions between Axiom and Sage. It defaults
>> to your unparsed input form if it can't find anything smarter to do
To me it sounds very complicated to keep a memory of what string a
real number was first created with... but Sage already does a lot of
complicated things!
2008/9/8 Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yep. This has bothered me too. The basic idea would be to have
> RealNumber(x) return a wrap
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:12 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> This is unfortunate:
>>
>> sage: R256=RealField(256)
>> sage: R256('1.2')
>> 1.200
>> sage: R256(1.2)
Aye looks like I might be behind the curve (well even for OS X) with
gcc and friends:
gcc -v
Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8
Configured with: /private/var/tmp/gcc/gcc-5250.obj~12/src/configure --
disable-checking -enable-werror --prefix=/usr --mandir=/share/man --
enable-languages=c,objc,c++,obj-c++
Are there any other output formats which have three dots "..." in them
as standard? If so they are not getting doctested as much as they
should be!
John
-- Forwarded message --
From: SAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/9/8
Subject: Re: [SAGE] #3102: [with patch, with review, is
Hi Sage-Devel,
What do you think of adding a license/ subdirectory to each spkg?
When the spkg, say foo-1.2.3.spkg is installed, the directory
SAGE_ROOT/license/packages/foo
would be a copy of that license/ subdirectory.
(The above is shamelessly copied from the start of Williams "doc/"
pr
On 8 Sep., 17:52, Simon Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just completed this lengthy process on my power book.
>
> A couple of trivial problems arose:
>
> 1. had to set MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 (why not 10.4?) as this
> was missing from ntl build and defaults to 10.0 which won't work wit
On Sep 8, 10:52 am, Simon Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more thing is that atlas doesn't seem to build on this platform. I
> can hand crank an atlat configuration but it barfs beacuse I cant turn
> off cpu throttling on the PowerBook G4 - how is this "tuned" for a
> binary build?
We
One more thing is that atlas doesn't seem to build on this platform. I
can hand crank an atlat configuration but it barfs beacuse I cant turn
off cpu throttling on the PowerBook G4 - how is this "tuned" for a
binary build?
On Sep 8, 4:52 pm, Simon Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just comple
This is on amd64 gutsy gibbon:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/bernoulli_mod_p.pyx
sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/arith.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/lisp.py
Total time for all tests: 4005.5 seconds
Please see /home/wdj/sagefiles/sage-
Ops, i sent a wrong version. Here is the last one, with added suport
for rings over transcendental extensions:
def coerce_ring_from_singular(r):
cha=str(r.charstr())
vars=str(r.varstr()).rsplit(',')
ch=cha.partition(',')[0]
if ch=='real':
fiel=RR
elif ch=='0':
> This still doesn't work the right way for finite extension fields:
>
> sage: k. = GF(2^8)
> sage: P. = k[]
> sage: P
> Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x, y over Finite Field in a of size 2^8
>
> sage: r = P._singular_()
> sage: coerce_ring_from_singular(r)
> Multivariate Polynomial Ring in x, y
Just completed this lengthy process on my power book.
A couple of trivial problems arose:
1. had to set MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 (why not 10.4?) as this
was missing from ntl build and defaults to 10.0 which won't work with -
undefined dynamic_lookup. Workaround was to set this globally, may
On Monday 08 September 2008, Paul Leopardi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I will be attending Sage Days 10 in Nancy, but am very new to Sage and
> need some pointers on where to find stuff. Also, I have heard about
> some recent developments in C++ linear algebra libraries and wonder
> how this relates to Sag
Hi there,
Sage Days 10 is coming up
http://wiki.sagemath.org/days10
and it seems about time to organise some accommodation. According to
http://www.ot-nancy.fr/uk/centre_historique/index.php
I see two budget options:
1) The Youth Hostel seems to be in walking distance
http://www.fuaj.o
Paul Leopardi a écrit :
> Hi all,
> I will be attending Sage Days 10 in Nancy, but am very new to Sage and
> need some pointers on where to find stuff. Also, I have heard about
> some recent developments in C++ linear algebra libraries and wonder
> how this relates to Sage.
>
> The most recent dev
Hi all,
I will be attending Sage Days 10 in Nancy, but am very new to Sage and
need some pointers on where to find stuff. Also, I have heard about
some recent developments in C++ linear algebra libraries and wonder
how this relates to Sage.
The most recent development is Matrix Template Library (
25 matches
Mail list logo
