I have a question about hyperlinks between worksheets.
I am trying to convert my open-source linear algebra textbook (http://
linear.ups.edu/) into a group of Sage worksheets. Right now, I
convert the LaTeX for each of the 50 or so sections into its own page
of XHTML that is acceptable to jsMath
>
> Thanks! Could you write to Michael Abshoff (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) and ask
> for a trac account, then open three trac tickets, one
> for each of the above? Thanks again!
Yes, I just did.
Greetings,
Wilfried
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send em
Just one comment, about your use of BinaryQF_reduced_representatives()
. There are patches undergoing review now relevant to this (at
#4120). That function was made a lot more efficient in #3857 (now
merged) but that function returns a list of the representative forms,
while you only need the nu
Hi there!
I attended the SAGE DAYS 10 in Nancy (Thanks the people there for
everything!). As other colleague and me are interested in crypto
interesting Elliptic Curves, we noticed that the SAGE function that
calculates the Hilbert class polynomial needs magma, so we proposed at
the
Coding Sprint
On Monday 03 November 2008, eduardo wrote:
> * We can perhaps use mpz_t (from GMP) instead of long long. Then we
> need to know how can we input/ouput a variable of this type in Cython. Is
> there some documentation about that?
Hi there,
AFAIK there is no documentation as such but plenty of exam
William Stein wrote:
> Incidentally, if we did allow automatic creation of symbolic
> variables, and default calling of symbolic expressions, then
> doing something like this would happen
> all the time and confuse the crap out of people:
>
> sage: function_name_with_slight_typo(10)
> 10
Well, t
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Robert Dodier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
>> Incidentally, if we did allow automatic creation of symbolic
>> variables, and default calling of symbolic expressions, then
>> doing something like this would happen
>> all the time and confuse
On here:
Linux version 2.6.16.60-0.31-smp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2
20070115 (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Oct 7 16:16:29 UTC 2008
I get doctest failures in these:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx
For the record, Drew Sutherland (cc'd on this) has some screamingly
fast code for the CRT method, which he spoke about at ECC this year.
Kiran
eduardo wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I attended the SAGE DAYS 10 in Nancy (Thanks the people there for
> everything!). As other colleague and me are interested
2008/11/3 Kiran Kedlaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> For the record, Drew Sutherland (cc'd on this) has some screamingly
> fast code for the CRT method, which he spoke about at ECC this year.
Written in what? C?
John
>
> Kiran
>
> eduardo wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> I attended the SAGE DAYS 10 in Nan
On 2 Nov., 20:46, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 11:38 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Wilfried_Huss
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > I have written some code for the Maxima interface.
> > > You
On Nov 3, 2008, at 2:23 AM, Wilfried_Huss wrote:
> On 2 Nov., 20:46, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Nov 2, 11:38 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 3:10 AM, Wilfried_Huss
I have written some code for the Maxima interface.
You can find
Apparently some people are writing a replacement for Abramowitz and
Stegun's Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and
Mathematical Tables. The first preview of five chapters is here:
http://dlmf.nist.gov/
I noticed that the appendix on Software has maxima, pari/gp, mma, ma
On Nov 3, 2008, at 6:20 AM, eduardo wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I attended the SAGE DAYS 10 in Nancy (Thanks the people there for
> everything!). As other colleague and me are interested in crypto
> interesting Elliptic Curves, we noticed that the SAGE function that
> calculates the Hilbert class poly
On Nov 3, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Apparently some people are writing a replacement for Abramowitz and
> Stegun's Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and
> Mathematical Tables. The first preview of five chapters is here:
> http://dlmf.nist.gov/
>
> I noticed t
On 2 Nov., 12:10, Wilfried_Huss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have written some code for the Maxima interface.
> You can find the patches at:
> http://www.math.tugraz.at/~huss/sage
>
> calculus1.patch implements the conversion from Maxima
> matrices to Sage matrices.
This is now: #443
Hi John,
To give a bit more weight to the counterargument against the
alphabetti
solution:
> I agree, and I did not really mean my alphabetti suggestion to be
> taken too seriously.
In some version, there was an invasive declaration of single character
symbols
to be symbolic elements. This ca
Hi, I have the idea to create a website for sage benchmarks. It will
be part of the "tour" and you can see a stub here:
http://sagemath.org/tour-benchmarks.html
Therefore I want to collect some examples that show what Sage can do
really fast. I can remember the PartitionsP function, polynomials,
b
Patch(es) at #4370 ready for review.
Cheers,
gsw
On 26 Okt., 14:21, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is now #4370.
>
> John
>
> 2008/10/26 mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> > Minh Nguyen wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
>
> >> As explained in the "Sage Developer's Guide", it's very easy t
Hi there,
I'll give a talk on Sage this Thursday to the PhD student seminar of the
Information Security Group here at Royal Holloway, University of London.
Slides & demo print-out are here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/malb/egham-talk-rc0/
Feedback of course very welcome.
Cheers,
M
On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should fix all known issues from
> 3.2.alpha1. A lot of fixes from BD 15 were merged and we are well on
> the way to the final 3.2. I plan to do another alpha3 in two days
> unless I run our of time in w
On Nov 3, 4:57 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello folks,
>
> > here goes 3.2.alpha2 which should fix all known issues from
> > 3.2.alpha1. A lot of fixes from BD 15 were merged and we are well on
> > the way to the fin
On Nov 3, 2008, at 5:01 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Nov 3, 4:57 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
>> sage -t devel/sage/sage/groups/matrix_gps/matrix_group.py
>> See below
> Which matrix_group failure?
The one men
> Qt was originally licensed under terms which many people considered
> not open source or not GPL compatible. I think a consequence of this
> was that the GNOME project took off in order to develop an alternative
> to the KDE desktop environment, which originally was developed with Qt
> using th
sage: R.=RDF['t']
sage: s=1.0e1*t^3+1.0e-100*t^2+1.01234e-100*t+1.0e1
sage: u=1.0e1*t^3-1.0e1*t^2+1.0e1*t-1.0e1
sage: s*u
100.0*t^6 - 100.0*t^5 + 100.0*t^4 - 100.0*t^2 + 100.0*t - 100.0
What happened to the t^3 term?
Bill.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this gro
Bill Hart wrote:
> sage: R.=RDF['t']
> sage: s=1.0e1*t^3+1.0e-100*t^2+1.01234e-100*t+1.0e1
> sage: u=1.0e1*t^3-1.0e1*t^2+1.0e1*t-1.0e1
> sage: s*u
> 100.0*t^6 - 100.0*t^5 + 100.0*t^4 - 100.0*t^2 + 100.0*t - 100.0
>
> What happened to the t^3 term?
Isn't it zero in RDF?
sage: a0=RDF(1.0e1)
sage
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sage: R.=RDF['t']
This first line is wrong. It should be
R. = RDF[]
or
R. = PolynomialRing(RDF)
or
R. = RDF['t']
As is, you've made the polynomial ring that prints its
variable as t but is referred to as x. He
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Qt was originally licensed under terms which many people considered
>> not open source or not GPL compatible. I think a consequence of this
>> was that the GNOME project took off in order to develop an alternative
>> to
On Nov 3, 2008, at 7:39 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Bill Hart wrote:
>> sage: R.=RDF['t']
>> sage: s=1.0e1*t^3+1.0e-100*t^2+1.01234e-100*t+1.0e1
>> sage: u=1.0e1*t^3-1.0e1*t^2+1.0e1*t-1.0e1
>> sage: s*u
>> 100.0*t^6 - 100.0*t^5 + 100.0*t^4 - 100.0*t^2 + 100.0*t - 100.0
>>
>> What happened to the t^3
I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition too.
Very good.
Someone was just asking me a question related to the program
you used to create the graph of on page 26. Is this a graph of
Sage classes? What is the program/command called?
Also, what font are you using? I lik
On 4 Nov., 01:57, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
> this has been reported, but I just noticed that there is
> "significant bit noise", not insignificant bit noise:
>
31 matches
Mail list logo
