Thanks for all the feedback. I'll post again when I have another
update.
Elliott
On Dec 12, 4:23 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Ronan Paixão wrote:
> > Actually, I prefer the theme as it is.
>
> > Probably, a lot of other people won't like the new one, specially
> > because it doesn't use white as a
Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Actually, I prefer the theme as it is.
>
> Probably, a lot of other people won't like the new one, specially
> because it doesn't use white as a background (which sagemath.org also
> uses). It seems to be tiresome to the eyes in my opinion.
>
Elliott,
Thanks for all your
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Ronan Paixão wrote:
>
> Actually, I prefer the theme as it is.
>
> Probably, a lot of other people won't like the new one, specially
> because it doesn't use white as a background (which sagemath.org also
> uses). It seems to be tiresome to the eyes in my opinion.
Actually, I prefer the theme as it is.
Probably, a lot of other people won't like the new one, specially
because it doesn't use white as a background (which sagemath.org also
uses). It seems to be tiresome to the eyes in my opinion.
Ronan Paixão
Em Sex, 2008-12-12 às 15:44 -0800, Elliott escre
2008/12/12 David Joyner :
>
> This is really cool. I think you can have comments in a css file, can't you?
> If you can, perhaps you could add some details (copyright info,
> maybe even the instructions below, etc). in a comment?
> Is there a place in the wiki it could be posted?
Yep, CSS has C-s
This is really cool. I think you can have comments in a css file, can't you?
If you can, perhaps you could add some details (copyright info,
maybe even the instructions below, etc). in a comment?
Is there a place in the wiki it could be posted?
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Elliott wrote:
>
Alright: I've made an initial version of a notebook theme in line with
the look of sagemath.org. A preview can be found at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/elliottd/themes/sagemath-theme.png,
with the CSS file to make the changes at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/elliottd/themes/sagemath
Ronan Paixão wrote:
> It would be nice to see how that ad will impact sage's site measures.
>
I wonder. There are only 1800 subscribers, mostly from The Netherlands.
I'm more curious to know how some notorious Magma users will react!
Hi Wieb.
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~--
It would be nice to see how that ad will impact sage's site measures.
Em Sex, 2008-12-12 às 16:12 +0100, Jaap Spies escreveu:
> Harald Schilly wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 13:52, Jaap Spies wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Today the postman delivered the journal! See my scan.
> >>
> >
> > Very c
> I'm not sure where to order the business cards, if anyone knows a good
> cheap online place for that please let me know.
>
Vistaprint (www.vistaprint.com) does fast and cheap business cards
that generally look pretty good.
-cc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to t
Hi,
Is anybody interested in stuff like this (e.g., it could be nice for
teaching a class about writing math proofs):
sage: f = propcalc.formula("a&((b|c)^a->c)<->b")
sage: g = propcalc.formula("boolean<->algebra")
sage: (f&~g).ifthen(f)
((a&((b|c)^a->c)<->b)&(~(boolean<->algebra)))->(a&((b|c)^a
That should work. As I said, I only use bounded polytopes so some of
my code is badly vertex-oriented.
You can submit a patch as above and I will review it. It is good to
have relatively small patches since they are easier to test.
I saw I just missed you on IRC, I am usually logged in but not
Yet another question: see no reason why unbounded polyhedra are not
handled by mink_sum()
def mink_sum(polyhedra_list, verbose = False):
"""
Returns the Minkowski sum of a list of polyhedra.
TODO: currently only works for polytopes, not unbounded polyhedra
"""
Currently, the ver
Yet another question: see no reason why unbounded polyhedra are not
handled by mink_sum()
def mink_sum(polyhedra_list, verbose = False):
"""
Returns the Minkowski sum of a list of polyhedra.
TODO: currently only works for polytopes, not unbounded polyhedra
"""
Currently, the ver
Thanks for the input everyone!
My idea was that after stopping by the booth, people who are
interested in sage mainly need to know where to go and where to get
help. So I think the main url and the sage-support should both be
there. But I agree that it would help to get rid of the trac, devel,
On Friday 12 December 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
> Martin Albrecht wrote:
> > On Friday 12 December 2008, mhampton wrote:
> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/bcard.png
> >
> > I'd cut back on the text, it seems overloaded to me. I would only have
> > *one* URL on there (http://www.sag
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Friday 12 December 2008, mhampton wrote:
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/bcard.png
>
> I'd cut back on the text, it seems overloaded to me. I would only have *one*
> URL on there (http://www.sagemath.org) and maybe one (or two) pictures.
>
I agree.
Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 13:52, Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Today the postman delivered the journal! See my scan.
>>
>
> Very cool. Let's wait and see what happens!
>
Still wondering whether there is a connection between content and
the advertisement. Didn't find a re
On Dec 12, 6:58 am, "Sébastien Barthélemy"
wrote:
Hi Sébastien
> > Yep, have you tried contacting the author? We actually have a bunch of
> > improvements to cddlib's build system to whom the author never
> > responded. See #3304 for example. If you have any better luck with
> > contact please
> Yep, have you tried contacting the author? We actually have a bunch of
> improvements to cddlib's build system to whom the author never
> responded. See #3304 for example. If you have any better luck with
> contact please let us know.
No.
However, I had contact with the maintainer of the matl
On Friday 12 December 2008, mhampton wrote:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/bcard.png
I'd cut back on the text, it seems overloaded to me. I would only have *one*
URL on there (http://www.sagemath.org) and maybe one (or two) pictures.
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_
Looks good to me.
BTW, another place that does t-shirts etc is zazzle. I have no
recommendation for or
against zazzle or cafepress though.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:37 AM, mhampton wrote:
>
> Here's a first attempt at a simple sage business card design:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home
Here's a first attempt at a simple sage business card design:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhampton/bcard.png
-M. Hampton
On Dec 12, 6:25 am, mhampton wrote:
> I need some designs for the joint math meetings in January for:
>
> 1) Mugs and a t-shirt from cafepress
>
> 2) Cover art for
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 13:52, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today the postman delivered the journal! See my scan.
>
Very cool. Let's wait and see what happens!
H
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
I need some designs for the joint math meetings in January for:
1) Mugs and a t-shirt from cafepress
2) Cover art for the sage tutorial, sage constructions, and sage
programming guide.
3) Sage business cards
I know Mike Hansen mentioned a different t-shirt manufacturer on IRC,
but I forget wh
On Dec 12, 3:15 am, "Sébastien Barthélemy"
wrote:
> Do you know this (LGPLed) work:http://cens.ioc.ee/projects/polyhedron/
>
> It wraps some of cddlib functions in python and also provide a higher level
> python class. I never tried it though.
>
> I found it on the cddlib "links" webpage. Maybe
On Dec 12, 1:15 am, "Sébastien Barthélemy"
wrote:
> 2008/12/12 mhampton :
Hi,
> > Oh, I forgot one to address one thing: cddlib is used as a seperate
> > process, and not wrapped, just because of my lack of skills. Since
> > its a standard component library it should be used in a smarter way
On Dec 12, 1:10 am, "Sébastien Barthélemy"
wrote:
Hi,
> > Where is your patch? Is it on trac somewhere? - if so I can't find
> > it.
>
> I forgot to attach it to my email, sorry. I just requested a trac account,
That one should work now.
> I'll put it there for easier review, and assign t
2008/12/12 mhampton :
>
> Oh, I forgot one to address one thing: cddlib is used as a seperate
> process, and not wrapped, just because of my lack of skills. Since
> its a standard component library it should be used in a smarter way, I
> just haven't gotten around to learning how. Most of them t
> I thought the union command made sense, but I think I understand why
> you don't like it.
as I understood it, p1.union(p2) currently returns the convex hull of the
vertices of p1 and p2. and _not_ the set union of p1 and p2. So I wonder
1) is this method really worth existing ? (it is 1 line le
30 matches
Mail list logo
