[sage-devel] Re: Sage Horizon (comments)

2009-05-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote: > > > > On May 17, 11:13 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote: > * at the very end of the presentation there was a discussion about > numeric stuff. There are tons of computational programs in lots of > fields (atomic physics, quantum field theory, el

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Horizon (comments)

2009-05-17 Thread Tim Lahey
On May 18, 2009, at 2:02 AM, William Stein wrote: > > I agree. We can do anything if we have enough energy, organization, > resources, and work hard enough. > > Having the SPD project build up infrastructure in the numerical > direction is a great way to organize ourselves in order to accompli

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Horizon (comments)

2009-05-17 Thread William Stein
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote: > > > > On May 17, 11:13 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote: > * at the very end of the presentation there was a discussion about > numeric stuff. There are tons of computational programs in lots of > fields (atomic physics, quantum field theory, el

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Horizon (comments)

2009-05-17 Thread Marshall Hampton
On May 17, 11:13 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote: * at the very end of the presentation there was a discussion about numeric stuff. There are tons of computational programs in lots of fields (atomic physics, quantum field theory, electromagnetics, electronic structure calculations, fluid dynamics, atmo

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Horizon (comments)

2009-05-17 Thread Tim Lahey
On May 18, 2009, at 12:13 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > > * at the very end of the presentation there was a discussion about > numeric stuff. There are tons of computational programs in lots of > fields (atomic physics, quantum field theory, electromagnetics, > electronic structure calculations,

[sage-devel] Sage Horizon (comments)

2009-05-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, there was an interesting talk by William about the future of Sage, that I just watched at http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/sagedays15/ it's the file: M2U00407-wstein-sage5.0-HORIZON.MPG (you can watch the compressed version as I did) So here are couple subjective comments that

[sage-devel] Re: statistics in sage

2009-05-17 Thread Kwankyu
Hi, About (3), basic distributions, and symbolic calculations of pdfs of distributions defined as functions of basic distributions. Also you may look into the statistics functionality of Mathematica. Kwankyu --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send emai

[sage-devel] Re: sage days video and photos

2009-05-17 Thread Minh Nguyen
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Harald Schilly wrote: > > > > On May 17, 9:30 pm, Jaap Spies wrote: >> >> Even compressed the screens are legible! >> > > i have nearly no experience with mencoder, i think the quality could > be improved by tweaking some parameters. e.g. reducing the number of >

[sage-devel] statistics in sage

2009-05-17 Thread mhampton
Here at Sage Days 15, William Stein gave a presentation on the future of Sage in which one of the issues was improved statistics support. While we include statistics functionality vis R, rpy, and scipy.stats, that functionality is not unified and has usability problems (for example, plots in R are

[sage-devel] Re: sage days video and photos

2009-05-17 Thread Serge A. Salamanka
I would suggest then to start a channel on miroguide here: https://www.miroguide.com/ One can post HD videos on his own channel. And the Miro player is very useful. #Serge Golam Mortuza Hossain пишет: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:02 AM, William Stein wrote: >> I posted a bunch of photo

[sage-devel] Re: libfplll 3.0.12 fails on Solaris (SPARC) with Sage 4.0.alpha0

2009-05-17 Thread mabshoff
On May 17, 1:34 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > I'm not sure if you expected this to fail, but it compiled ok on my > Solaris 10 update 6 SPARC until here: Yes, it was mentioned as a problem in the 4.0.a0 release notes. I have a fix that will be in 4.0.rc0. Cheers, Michael --~--~-~--

[sage-devel] libfplll 3.0.12 fails on Solaris (SPARC) with Sage 4.0.alpha0

2009-05-17 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
I'm not sure if you expected this to fail, but it compiled ok on my Solaris 10 update 6 SPARC until here: libfplll-3.0.12/src/src/llldiff.cpp libfplll-3.0.12/src/src/wrapper.cpp libfplll-3.0.12/src/src/topenum.cpp libfplll-3.0.12/src/AUTHORS libfplll-3.0.12/src/dummy.cpp Finished extraction **

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

2009-05-17 Thread Kiran Kedlaya
On May 16, 10:55 am, mabshoff wrote: > As usual please build, doctest and report any issues. > > All tests pass on my 64-bit Opteron box under Fedora 10. Kiran --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe

[sage-devel] Re: sage days video and photos

2009-05-17 Thread Golam Mortuza Hossain
Hi, On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:02 AM, William Stein wrote: > I posted a bunch of photos from SAge Days 15 here: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/sagedays15/photos/ > > Also, the rest of the video is now posted here: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/sagedays15/ I gu

[sage-devel] Re: sage days video and photos

2009-05-17 Thread Harald Schilly
On May 17, 9:30 pm, Jaap Spies wrote: > > Even compressed the screens are legible! > i have nearly no experience with mencoder, i think the quality could be improved by tweaking some parameters. e.g. reducing the number of frames per second. maybe someone has better ideas? not moving the camer

[sage-devel] Re: sage days video and photos

2009-05-17 Thread Jaap Spies
William Stein wrote: > > I have changed the camera view on the subsequent videos to mostly be a > zoom just on the screen. The uncompressed video should have > sufficiently clear screens. > Even compressed the screens are legible! Thanks, Jaap > William > > > > --~--~-~--~--

[sage-devel] Re: sage days video and photos

2009-05-17 Thread William Stein
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Tim Lahey wrote: >> >> >> On May 17, 2009, at 1:02 AM, William Stein wrote: >> >>> Also, the rest of the video is now posted here: >>> >>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/sagedays15/ >>> >> >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

2009-05-17 Thread mabshoff
On May 17, 11:33 am, J Elaych wrote: > Ubuntu 9.04 64bit amd xp2 builds fine.  The -optional and - > experimental package list > is the same as always so I'm wondering if that is going to be upgraded > to the latest > scipy Scipy is in Sage, so it won't show up in the optional or experimental

[sage-devel] Re: sage days video and photos

2009-05-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Tim Lahey wrote: > > > On May 17, 2009, at 1:02 AM, William Stein wrote: > >> Also, the rest of the video is now posted here: >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/sagedays15/ >> > > William, > > Thanks for doing this. I've only watched the intro vide

[sage-devel] Re: [ANN] sage-mode-0.6

2009-05-17 Thread Nick Alexander
> If you remember, please let me know that everything's good. I have > some fixes to pyrex mode to make for David Roe and I'd like to release > a 0.6.1 sometime soon. Hi David and other pyrex developers, http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=sage-mode-0.6-dr.spkg o

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

2009-05-17 Thread J Elaych
Ubuntu 9.04 64bit amd xp2 builds fine. The -optional and - experimental package list is the same as always so I'm wondering if that is going to be upgraded to the latest scipy/mayavi2 and so on. Graphviz does not build with 'sage -i graphviz-2.16.1.p0' but thats an old graphviz so I'm just using

[sage-devel] Feature request - python module directory for personal notebook server

2009-05-17 Thread Kevin Horton
Trac ticket 3844 proposes to automatically add the worksheet DATA directory to sys.path, so we can easily import python modules - great idea! But, this DATA directory is specific to each worksheet. If we have a common set of python modules that will be used in many worksheets, it would b

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

2009-05-17 Thread mabshoff
On May 17, 3:29 am, Carlo Hamalainen wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:55 PM, mabshoff wrote: > > As usual please build, doctest and report any issues. Hi Carlo, > On 32bit x86 Ubuntu 9.04: > > The following tests failed: > >         sage -t  "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima.py" >        

[sage-devel] Re: Feature requests - URLs for published notebook worksheets

2009-05-17 Thread Kevin Horton
On 17 May 2009, at 10:07, Kevin Horton wrote: > Two feature requests for URLs for published notebook worksheets: > > 1. If a the publication status worksheet is selected from published to > unpublished to published, the URL changes (the number is incremented > to the next available). This causes

[sage-devel] Feature requests - URLs for published notebook worksheets

2009-05-17 Thread Kevin Horton
Two feature requests for URLs for published notebook worksheets: 1. If a the publication status worksheet is selected from published to unpublished to published, the URL changes (the number is incremented to the next available). This causes grief if the URL has been given to anyone. It wo

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.0.alpha0 released!

2009-05-17 Thread Carlo Hamalainen
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:55 PM, mabshoff wrote: > As usual please build, doctest and report any issues. On 32bit x86 Ubuntu 9.04: The following tests failed: sage -t "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/maxima.py" sage -t "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx" Total time for all

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2 released (and this time it is the final one)

2009-05-17 Thread mabshoff
On May 17, 1:39 am, "Serge A. Salamanka" wrote: > It would be good to update sage-announce Google Group due to the new > release. There is still information about 3.3 release. > > #Serge Yeah, I know. It is on my list to do, but I have been working non-stop on 4.0 for the last couple weeks, so

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.4.2 released (and this time it is the final one)

2009-05-17 Thread Serge A. Salamanka
It would be good to update sage-announce Google Group due to the new release. There is still information about 3.3 release. #Serge Minh Nguyen пишет: > Hi folks, > > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:37 AM, mabshoff wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> apologies that it took a while, but the final 3.4.2 source

[sage-devel] Re: Help system

2009-05-17 Thread Michel
One thing: the TEST section is not documented. Michel On May 16, 9:52 pm, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On May 16, 2009, at 8:35 AM, Michel wrote: > > > > > On May 16, 1:10 pm, Robert Bradshaw > > wrote: > >> On May 16, 2009, at 3:16 AM, Michel wrote: > > >>> I would be very useful is sage did so