Hi Nick,
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> In the meantime, can someone cut an alpha0 for Mac OS X 10.5?
> (Preferably just tar.gz, not dmg.) Also, is such a thing done via
> just sage -bdist?
Not quite. After successfully compiling from source, you then issue
these
On 1-Jun-09, at 9:32 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sage 4.0.1.alpha has been released. This should hopefully take care
> of
> the rest of the fallout from the switch to Pynac. The tarball can be
> found at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.1.alpha0.tar
On IRC
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> I recently ran into a pickling problem and needed an older Sage version
> to fix the problem. I used the collection of older Sage versions that's
> available on sage.math, but I thought I might as well build such a
> collection on my own machine.
I recently ran into a pickling problem and needed an older Sage version
to fix the problem. I used the collection of older Sage versions that's
available on sage.math, but I thought I might as well build such a
collection on my own machine.
I can't find older tarballs, though. The oldest version o
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> I just ran across pyflakes, which is something like a python lint or
> pychecker, but it is very fast and doesn't run the code to check it. It
> was interesting to see the program complain about several unused imports
> in graphs/graph.py, f
I just ran across pyflakes, which is something like a python lint or
pychecker, but it is very fast and doesn't run the code to check it. It
was interesting to see the program complain about several unused imports
in graphs/graph.py, for example, and a call to an undefined function.
It's fast
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> On 2009-Jun-02 13:01:26 -0700, gsw wrote:
>>a "Configuration Management Plan" would be quite helpful (fancy
>>wording from professional software development).
>>
>>In down-to-earth terms, (and with a grain of salt) this would be a
>>check-lis
On 2009-Jun-02 13:01:26 -0700, gsw wrote:
>a "Configuration Management Plan" would be quite helpful (fancy
>wording from professional software development).
>
>In down-to-earth terms, (and with a grain of salt) this would be a
>check-list "first you do this ..., remember always to ..., then you do
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> On Jun 2, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
>> On Jun 2, 9:12 am, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> Should we start a "sage-release" mailing list for planning releases
>>> and discussing build issues?
>>
>> Personally, I like it if it
I'm forwarding this to sage-devel.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sigurd Torkel Meldgaard
Date: Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:51 AM
Subject: [Sage Bug Report] sage.rings.arith.is_prime is not passing
the flag parameter to pari
To: wst...@gmail.com
Hi
sage.rings.arith.is_prime is not pa
> I took an example from that patch, as the ticket hardly contains any
> code to really showcase the features introduced by the patch.
Very reasonable.
> I'm
> currently updating the developers' guide, expanding it with
> observations written by Michael Abshoff about the trac guideline. But
> on
See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6085#comment:3
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Robert Miller wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I desperately need someone to start looking over the patches on #6085.
> I am finishing the c_graph implementation so that Cython can replace
> NetworkX (which is wr
Hello all,
This is my first post. My name is Yoav, and I'm studying for an
Information Security MSc at Royal Holloway, University of London. I'm
starting to work on a project proposed by Martin Albrecht, to look at
several security aspects of the Sage Notebook server.
The MSc project is primaril
On Jun 2, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Jun 2, 9:12 am, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Should we start a "sage-release" mailing list for planning releases
>> and discussing build issues?
>
> Personally, I like it if it sticks here on sage-devel. We could tag
> each subject by a scheme
Hi Nick,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> First, I really appreciate the human edited release tour!
>
> However, the examples you give for some of the work I did (the number
> field relativize) include "improved" timings that are likely just
> noise. The real benefit
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 09:14, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> What about brushing your teeth? :-)
>
coffee now, then brushing! ;)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel
Hi Harald,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 06:33, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> You can find a nicely formatted release tour of Sage 4.0 at
>>
>> http://mvngu.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/sage-4-0-released/
>>
>
> cool thanks !!! .. first thing i did today is
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 06:33, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> You can find a nicely formatted release tour of Sage 4.0 at
>
> http://mvngu.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/sage-4-0-released/
>
cool thanks !!! .. first thing i did today is including it in the motd
of sagemath.org ;)
h
--~--~-~--~~
18 matches
Mail list logo
