On Feb 9, 3:53 pm, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> * Implement the various options for both latex constructions (tikz or
> dot2tex)
I looked through the changes to latex (tikzpicture) code for graphs,
to allow consistent handling of the dot2tex/graphviz output. It all
looks fine and the tikzpictu
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:10:46AM -0500, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> I am indifferent to the choice of convention. I agree that the conflict
> you point out is disturbing. My choice for using the smallest support
> was based on the current behavior of printing in sage (for most
> combinatorics).
>
>
Hi folks,
Here's the log of the failed build:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/doc/sage/install/sage-4.3.0.2/install-4.3.0.2.alpha5-6583-t2.math.log.bz2
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
Hi Robert!
Thanks for your quick feedback!
Anyone else comments? Vincent is about to review the code.
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 04:15:59PM -0800, Robert Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
> wrote:
> > Due to urgent needs for Sage days 20, I just rebased and
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:41:55PM +0100, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> I started the lecture and the review. I need your tools to draw huge
> Rauzy diagrams (more than 1000 vertices) and graphs of graphs. Hence,
> I will see if your patch is "adaptable".
Excellent, thanks! That will be a good stress
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is the sage-combinat server and trac down?
It seems the main boxes (sage, geom, mod, and boxen) aren't working at
the moment, and the sage-combinat server runs on boxen.
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-deve
Hi Robert,
On 10 Feb., 20:53, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
[...]
> Also, there's talk of v[1] returning a subscripted variable (no-one's
> implemented this yet).
Since a while, there are infinite polynomial rings in Sage. OK, the
generators of an infinite polynomial ring do not return *symbolic*
var
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Nils Bruin wrote:
On Feb 10, 1:39 am, Stan Schymanski wrote:
Dear all,
I suppose that the below is not possible yet, so I am forwarding this
to sage-devel. I think it would be great if one was able to access
parts of an expression in a nested way, e.g.
expr1 = (a
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:36 AM, davidp wrote:
> I am trying to install 4ti2 with the command
>
> sage -i 4ti2.p0
>
> on my desktop running Fedora 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64. Here is
> the resulting error message:
>
> ---
> /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link
I am trying to install 4ti2 with the command
sage -i 4ti2.p0
on my desktop running Fedora 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64. Here is
the resulting error message:
---
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -I/usr/local/
sage-4.3.2/local/include -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACRO
On Feb 10, 1:39 am, Stan Schymanski wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I suppose that the below is not possible yet, so I am forwarding this
> to sage-devel. I think it would be great if one was able to access
> parts of an expression in a nested way, e.g.
>
> expr1 = (a*x^3 + b*x)/(1 - Sqrt((1 - x)/(x - c)))
William,
On Feb 10, 10:55 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > Minh,
> > IMHO, this is a missing feature of sage -f.
> > Either it should always do sage -b
> > after the building of the package is done,
> > or there should be an option in spkg-ins
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Minh,
> IMHO, this is a missing feature of sage -f.
> Either it should always do sage -b
> after the building of the package is done,
> or there should be an option in spkg-install to trigger sage -b
There is already an option in spkg-insta
Dear all,
I have just created track ticket #8229, that completes the task of
upgrading
gap.spkg (ticket #8076) and patching the relevant parts of devel/sage/
(ticket #8150)
by also upgrading gap_packages.spkg
Please test. Let's finish this story and upgrade to gap-4.4.12, at
last.
Thanks,
Dima
--
Minh,
IMHO, this is a missing feature of sage -f.
Either it should always do sage -b
after the building of the package is done,
or there should be an option in spkg-install to trigger sage -b
Dima
On Feb 10, 9:56 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Dima,
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Dima Pasech
Hi Simon,
Thanks for your feedback,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 04:51:37AM -0800, Simon King wrote:
> > > sage: p = 3*x^2+2*x+1
> > > sage: p.leading_coefficient()
> > > 3
> >
> > Florent is also +1 on this convention, and I just fixed the patch
> > accordingly. But it is still ti
Hi Dima,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Is it a bug
No. See the following sage-support thread for a reason why this happens:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_frm/thread/fcc09183eda071d2
That thread also contains a solution to the problem you're
e
Why trying LP and MILP functionality required by e.g.
degree_constrained_subgraph in graphs/graph.py,
I noticed that just installing the corresponding package is not
enough, one must run
sage -b
afterwards.
Is it a bug, or a feature?
Best,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-de
Hi!
On Feb 10, 12:36 pm, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:06:50AM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > I finally started to review #7914. One thing that did slip through
> > my fingers. I just noticed that leading_term returns the term with
> > smallest support. I instead as
Dear Sage / Sage-combinat devs,
This is a short call for votes about leading terms and triangular
morphisms.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:06:50AM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> I finally started to review #7914. One thing that did slip through
> my fingers. I just noticed that leading_te
Tom Boothby wrote:
Context is important. The GPL doesn't say that every GPL'd
interactive program must print a banner. It says that if such a
banner is printed by a current GPL'd programs, then *if you distribute
a modified copy*, that copy must also print the banner.
Personally, I would have
Dear all,
I suppose that the below is not possible yet, so I am forwarding this
to sage-devel. I think it would be great if one was able to access
parts of an expression in a nested way, e.g.
expr1 = (a*x^3 + b*x)/(1 - Sqrt((1 - x)/(x - c))) + c/x
expr1[0]
(a*x^3 + b*x)/(1 - Sqrt((1 - x)/(x - c)
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Tom Boothby wrote:
>>
>> Context is important. The GPL doesn't say that every GPL'd
>> interactive program must print a banner. It says that if such a
>> banner is printed by a current GPL'd programs, then *if you distribute
>> a modified
23 matches
Mail list logo
