On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 11:47:35PM -0800, Simon King wrote:
On 9 Jan., 18:10, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 8, 1:54 pm, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
...
IMHO there should be several levels of equivalence, depending upon the
nature of morphism to be applied
Hello,
I made some improvements (?) of the Permutation function (in
improve_constructors_of_iet-vd.patch) in order to disable
{{{
sage: Permutation(['a','b','c'])
['a', 'b', 'c']
sage: Permutation([2,1,1])
[2, 1, 1]
}}}
We now have:
{{{
sage: Permutation(['a','b','c'])
TypeError
Dear Maximilian,
Thanks for the report and in particular the specific example!
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 02:30:00PM +0100, Maximilian Schlund wrote:
while experimenting with some random partial Latin squares I have
come across some squares for which the is_completable() Call seems
to
Hi!
I have a question about the Cartan type code:
sage: C = CartanType(['A',4,2])
sage: C.classical()
['C', 2]
sage: C.dual().classical()
['C', 2] relabelled by {1: 1, 2: 0}
Wouldn't it be better to output
['B', 2] in this case?
Anne
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:24:18AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
I have a question about the Cartan type code:
sage: C = CartanType(['A',4,2])
sage: C.classical()
['C', 2]
sage: C.dual().classical()
['C', 2] relabelled by {1: 1, 2: 0}
Wouldn't it be better to output
['B', 2] in this
Hi,
I have a question about the Cartan type code:
sage: C = CartanType(['A',4,2])
talking about Cartan types:
I implemented QuiverMutationType to work with quivers and cluster
algebras in http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10527. Those
contain in particular all finite and affine types
On 10 Jan., 08:56, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
IMO, it obviously should be added. But where in the TOC tree should it
be inserted? Perhaps under Basic Structures, right between Unique
Representation and Dynamic classes?
Or better under Miscellaneous, right after Abstract method?
sagelive-511-46-r3.iso released
I have build the Live CD distribution in the conventional way,
iso size is 630 MB (note: OS with applications, complete Sage with
jsmathfonts, Java and working R plotting)
release announcement is here
Hi all!
I needed them for a seminar project, so I updated the openmpi (see
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8537) mpi4py (see
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8538) packages and the
mpi4py docu (see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10566).
The packages worked on ubuntu
I just wanted to add my voice of *thanks!* to everyone involved with
the booth. I enjoyed the chance to meet some other sage folks and
talk to some new people about sage. And I love my sage sticker ;)
thanks everyone,
Niles
--
To post to this group, send an email to
Yes, the booth was great. Even during the slowest periods of the
exhibit areas, there was often at least one person stopping by. At
peak times we'd have as many as four people, each talking to a
different 'regular'. A lot of people mentioning wanting to consider
switching (as opposed to not
On Thursday, January 6, 2011 8:59:32 PM UTC+1, emil wrote:
contain lots of identical files
Here is a line for bash that shows you identical files:
find . -type f -exec md5sum {} \; | sort --key=1,32 | uniq -w 32 -d
--all-repeated=separate
H
--
To post to this group, send an email to
you can use fslint to identify duplicate files and merge them (i.e. hardlink
them to a single file).
[vbr...@volker-two ~]$ /usr/share/fslint/fslint/findup --help
find dUPlicate files.
Usage: findup [[[-t [-m|-d]] | [--summary]] [-r] [-f] paths(s) ...]
If no path(s) specified then the currrent
Thanks! It worked...
On 7 Jan., 06:01, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:03 PM, G Hahn gh...@cantab.net wrote:
Thanks for your help!
When you add a .pyxfile, you will also have to edit
SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/module_list.py to get sage -b to recognize it.
Look at
Ok I finally found the error. I should have used cpdef for the _lmul_
function. Now sparse*scalar multiplication runtime is finally no
longer depending on the matrix size, only on the number of nonzero
enties. It's ready for review at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10568
BTW. If you
The booth was great, and the stickers were a perfect conversation
starter. Thanks Marshall and Jason and Dan and everyone else I saw
manning the booth.
--
Benjamin Jones
jone...@uwstout.edu
On Jan 10, 8:32 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, the booth was great. Even during the slowest
16 matches
Mail list logo
