I seem to have similar issues :
I am still with sage-4.6.2, I did a hg pull and hg update and then
tried to pop and push all the patches and here's what I get :
applying trac_10998-categories-posets-nt.patch
unable to find 'sage/categories/facade_sets.py' for patching
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED --
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:49:11AM +0200, Viviane Pons wrote:
I seem to have similar issues :
I am still with sage-4.6.2, I did a hg pull and hg update and then
tried to pop and push all the patches and here's what I get :
applying trac_10998-categories-posets-nt.patch
unable to find
Ah, the -v has to go before the update command; sorry.
Here's the (hopefully relevant) excerpt from the verbose update
command...
pre
patch queue now empty
Pulling the new version of the patches from the patch server
(cd .hg/patches ; /mnt/data/sage-4.6.2/sage -hg --config
O.K. I think I am getting there slowly. I will expose my ignorance
I found the file examples/semigroups.py more useful than examples/monoids.py
as the latter just calls the former and adds the unit.
When I read that the product is a * b = a I thought this was a rather
disturbing typo. However
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Bruce brucewestb...@gmail.com wrote:
What I now understand and I assume no-one actually said as it is too
obvious (or maybe I was told and did not get it) is:
To implement a new monoid I define a new class which inherits from Parent.
The class definition has
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:23:31AM -0700, Bruce wrote:
O.K. I think I am getting there slowly. I will expose my ignorance
I found the file examples/semigroups.py more useful than
examples/monoids.py as the latter just calls the former and adds the unit.
Yup! I knew you would do this
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:58:53AM -0400, Franco Saliola wrote:
Only the required ones, which *should* be marked by @abstract_method. I
think there is a way to ask which methods are required, but I don't
remember how.
Look for abstract_methods_of_class in:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:01:19AM -0700, tom d wrote:
Ah, the -v has to go before the update command; sorry.
Here's the (hopefully relevant) excerpt from the verbose update
command...
pre
patch queue now empty
Pulling the new version of the patches from the patch server
(cd .hg/patches
pre
:/mnt/data/sage-4.6.2/devel/sage-combinat$ sage -hg qselect -s
guards in series file:
1 +4_1_2
2 -4_3_1
3 +4_3_1
1 -4_3_2
2 +4_3_2
2 +4_3_3
1 +4_3_3:
2 +4_3_4
1 -4_4
1 +4_4
2 +4_4_1
1 +4_4_2
1 +4_4_3
1 +4_4_4
2 -4_5
4 +4_5
3 -4_5_2
1 +4_5_2
1 +4_5_3
1
On May 10, 9:10 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:.
It just occurred to me, that it should be possible to keep the current
SPKG format, and implement uninstall. One just needs to keep track of
all files in SPKG_LOCAL, then see what new files were added + which
files have changed.
Maybe the following is also interesting
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.buildout/1.5.2
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Maarten Derickx
m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 10, 9:10 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:.
It just occurred to me, that it should be possible to keep the current
SPKG format, and implement uninstall. One just needs to keep track of
all
Hi
A One Time Error with Work Around...
On Ubuntu 11.04, sage 4.6.2, plus python-2.6.4.p10.spkg
to fix the crypt module, I start sage -notebook while firefox
is NOT running, and get this:
administration@aims-ethiopia-laptop:~$ sage -notebook
Hi!
When constructing a polynomial ring, one can provide arguments
sparse and implementation. But it seems that there is no sparse
version based on NTL implementation:
sage: R.x = PolynomialRing(ZZ, sparse=False, implementation='NTL')
sage: R.is_sparse()
False
sage: R
Univariate
Ooch ! That's bad indeed, and it is probably my fault...
Going to take a look at it !
By the way, please try to precise what the bug is about in the subject...
For example something wrong about graphs.DegreeSequenceBipartite.
(though it's very nice to report bugs in the first place !)
I'll
Hello again !
So, the problem is clear !
It comes from an error in the method gale_ryser_theorem. This theorem is
actually about filling a matrix with 0 and 1 when you know the number of 1
in each column and in each row, and this is totally equivalent to creating a
bipartite graph with a
On 05/10/11 11:35 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
Does Sage work with parallel installation of packages?
Absolutely. Do:
$ export SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD=yes
$ export MAKE='make -j8'
$ make
See the installation guide for information about the relevant environment
variables. I think that we
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello again !
So, the problem is clear !
It comes from an error in the method gale_ryser_theorem. This theorem is
actually about filling a matrix with 0 and 1 when you know the number of 1
in each column and in each
There is now a track ticket for this bug !
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11324
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group
Hi,
Today I was looking at live documentation a bit, I noticed that there
is an issue with multiline live documentation. I don't have rc of 4.7
around so I'd like to confirm that this is still an issue, if it is
(and there is no patch in the trac yet, which I did not found with
simple search, but
On 5/11/11 7:22 AM, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote:
Hi,
Today I was looking at live documentation a bit, I noticed that there
is an issue with multiline live documentation. I don't have rc of 4.7
around so I'd like to confirm that this is still an issue, if it is
(and there is no patch in the trac
On 04/27/2011 06:53 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
Wow, there are currently 237 tickets that are set to needs review on
trac right now [1].
[1]http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/30
I would like to encourage people to referee more tickets. That's it.
-- William
Hi,
I am involved in the JModelica/Assimulo effort, and I have also used
CasADi in collaboration with the Leuven team, so I thought I offer my
five cents.
I think that both JModelica/Assimulo and CasADi would be valuable
additions to Sage, since they address different problems, even though
there
That sounds right to me, at first glance.
Cool, so I made a ticket and posted patch that fixes it for me. It's
#11325 - http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11325
Andrzej.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
On May 11, 9:21 am, Philipp Schneider philipp.schneid...@gmx.net
wrote:
On 04/27/2011 06:53 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
Wow, there are currently 237 tickets that are set to needs review on
trac right now [1].
[1] http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/30
I would
I don't think we need a process at this point. I'd say release early
often. Even if its not perfect; Good is good enough.
Volker
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For
On May 11, 11:25 am, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think we need a process at this point. I'd say release early
often. Even if its not perfect; Good is good enough.
No, no, my point was not adding bureaucracy, but rather figuring out
how to get people to actually give
Hi Ondrej,
Will you create some spkg packages for the codes above? If so, I'd be
interested in it too, and I can test them.
Once I learn how to do a spkg I will be pleased to do so. I'm reading
the docs...
As I mentioned I just started with Sage.
Both Assimulo and python-sundials *are
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
OK, thanks for the explanation, Tom. p.exponents() was the missing
piece I did not have.
It would probably make sense to have p.monomials() method
Yet another email - this one to me directly - about trying to use Sage
on Windows.
This user wants to use Virtual Box. (Apparently VMWare Player doesn't
work on their server... which is a VMWare server. Don't ask.) But I
don't think we use that any more, correct? Yet
On 2011-05-11 20:21, kcrisman wrote:
Also, the VMWare image is Sage 4.6 ?!?! Just a little behind the
times...
Until the Cygwin issue gets resolved (and there has been some exciting
progress made lately, thank you so much to Mike and Dima et al.), we
at the very least need this to work,
I think this would be possible. The command-line utility VBoxManage lets you
do everything you can with the GUI. The only caveat is that it needs quite a
bit of storage and root permissions to start/stop virtual machines.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Guilherme guito...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
Will you create some spkg packages for the codes above? If so, I'd be
interested in it too, and I can test them.
Once I learn how to do a spkg I will be pleased to do so. I'm reading
the docs...
As I mentioned
Dear all,
I downloaded the lastest sage (4.7) and attempted to build it the
fails with the following error:
building 'Crypto.PublicKey._fastmath' extension
creating build/temp.linux-i686-2.6
creating build/temp.linux-i686-2.6/src
gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
gf2x is a little bugger. If you are on x86_64 or a few other select
platforms (any of core2|opteron|x86_64|nocona|k10 )
it automatically add files tuned for sse2 regardless of the other
configurations checks. That will be quite messy to untangle
properly.
I may have to force sse2 on x86_64,
On May 12, 6:25 am, Robert Goss goss.rob...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I downloaded the lastest sage (4.7) and attempted to build it the
fails with the following error:
what do you mean by latest 4.7 ?
The latest testing release is 4.7.rc1, and the latest stable is 4.6.2
building
On May 11, 8:41 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
But I think perhaps part of the problem with this (and the Russian and
Spanish translations, also awaiting review) is that it is not clear
what is needed for positive review. Deciding whether the translation
is idiomatic German is
37 matches
Mail list logo
