On 05/11/11 08:48 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
I think this would be possible. The command-line utility VBoxManage lets you
do everything you can with the GUI. The only caveat is that it needs quite a
bit of storage and root permissions to start/stop virtual machines.
The program could be made set
I got an email from the publisher today confirming the book on Sage has been
published, although the web site still says to be published in May 2011.
http://www.packtpub.com/sage-beginners-guide/book
Some fraction of sales will go to Sage, though I'm not sure what fraction, or if
there needs t
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> >> OK, thanks for the explanation, Tom. p.exponents() was the missing
> >> piece I did not have.
>
> > It would probably make sense to have p.monomials() method to be
> > consistent wi
Hi Johan,
Thank you for you brief overview.
> I am involved in the JModelica/Assimulo effort, and I have also used
> CasADi in collaboration with the Leuven team, so I thought I offer my
> five cents.
I actually emailed Christian Andersson asking for "blessing" before I
move forward.
I also cont
> what do you mean by "latest 4.7" ?
> The latest testing release is 4.7.rc1, and the latest stable is 4.6.2
>
Ah right I meant 4.7.rc1 by the lastest 4.7. Should have posted to
another group?
Robert
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from thi
This is (again) caused by overriding the shared library search path
LD_LIBRARY_PATH. In this case, the Sage version of ppl is incompatible with
the OS version of ppl. Because we are forcefully loading the Sage version,
gcc no longer works. We had similar problems with readline before. The only
I'm a bit confused as to what Suse is shipping, the latest ppl release is
11.2
As a workaround, you can delete $SAGE_LOCAL/lib/libppl.so.9.0.0 and replace
it with a symlink to your system libppl (/usr/lib64/libppl.so or somesuch).
Then re-run make.
Volker
--
To post to this group, send an e
I created a ticket for this:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11330
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google
All sparse polynomials are implemented within Sage, in
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_generic_sparse. It would be good if the
constructor only used the implementation as part of the key for dense
polynomials.
David
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:37, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When constructing a
On May 11, 9:41 am, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Maarten Derickx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> > On May 10, 9:10 am, Ondrej Certik wrote:.
>
> >> It just occurred to me, that it should be possible to keep the current
> >> SPKG format, and implement uninstall. One j
Hi David,
On 12 Mai, 13:55, David Roe wrote:
> All sparse polynomials are implemented within Sage, in
> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_generic_sparse. It would be good if the
> constructor only used the implementation as part of the key for dense
> polynomials.
Thank you for the clarification
> If, on the other hand, we would require that a translation of the
> documentation describing X into language Y is just something that
> describes X in good/acceptable language Y, then for a native/fluent
> speaker of Y the review process reduces to pretty much just reading
> documentation withou
Hello all,
At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it
would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see
whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7
in about a week or so.
Jeroen.
--
To post to this group, send an email
Hi people,
we now have this up and running, thanks to our sysadmins at NTU (Hi,
Melvin!)
http://jambu.spms.ntu.edu.sg/sage/
Could someone please add it to the list of mirrors?
Thanks,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, sen
On 24 Kwi, 15:26, pipedream wrote:
> We expect below spkg to be in sage 4.7.1. In the meantime, if you
> runUbuntu11.04(Natty)
> and stable sage 4.6.2, you can replace SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard/
> python-2.6.4.p9.spkg
> with this:
>
> http://users.aims.ac.za/~jan/python-2.6.4.p10.spkg
>
I did th
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:26 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> If, on the other hand, we would require that a translation of the
>> documentation describing X into language Y is just something that
>> describes X in good/acceptable language Y, then for a native/fluent
>> speaker of Y the review process red
Thanks Volker,
>I'm a bit confused as to what Suse is shipping, the latest ppl release is 11.2
Looking a little at the opensuse site it says that the version of
libppl is 11. and the release (of the package?) is 3.3 if this helps?
>As a workaround, you can delete $SAGE_LOCAL/lib/libppl.so.9.0.0
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 6:13:16 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> It's even conceivable that a tutorial in Russian
> (say) might be a bit different than the English version of the
> tutorial, due to cultural differences (I have no idea how).
>
For example, the Polish translation could use Reverse Pol
Done!
H
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Harald,
sorry, it should be
Nanyang Technological University
On May 13, 2:15 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
> Done!
>
> H
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
[...]
>>
>> What would be the advantage of having it in the SPKG itself?
>>
> That it wil be compatible with parallel building as mentioned earlier.
>
>> Like if you want to install two packages that overwrite the same file?
> I don't think w
On Thursday, May 12, 2011 3:18:29 PM UTC-7, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Maarten Derickx
> wrote:
> [...]
> >>
> >> What would be the advantage of having it in the SPKG itself?
> >>
> > That it wil be compatible with parallel building as mentioned earlier.
> >
> >> L
> On Thursday, May 12, 2011 3:18:29 PM UTC-7, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Maarten Derickx
> > wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > >> What would be the advantage of having it in the SPKG itself?
> > >
> > > That it wil be compatible with parallel building as mentioned earlier.
I've been reviewing #10804, which was merged in sage-4.7.1.alpha0. I
though this was a done deal... but apparently not. In the meantime,
#10549 got a positive review. It conflicted with #10804. Jeroen,
acting RM (for which I'm immensely grateful), backed out #10804 and
marked both patches needs
> If a ticket's been merged, unless it's found to have a genuine
> flaw, it should supersede ... tickets ... which have not been
> merged.
+1
--
Robert L. Miller
http://www.rlmiller.org/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, se
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated. I
find it easier to look at when typeset by TeX, so I call latex(), paste
the result into a document, then typeset.
On 5/12/11 11:38 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
If I have a Sage expression, I can do
latex(foo)
to get LaTeX code. Is there an inverse to that function?
Frequently, I do a calculation in Sage and get something complicated. I
find it easier to look at when typeset by TeX, so I call latex(), paste
th
27 matches
Mail list logo
