Very nice! Several suggestions - that are just that, suggestions.
I'd move "matrices" to be right next to "linear algebra." Maybe
include .characteristic_polynomial() in the linear algebra section.
I don't see ".diameter()" anywhere.
A section on "constructions"? You have "products", but ther
Hello,
Thanks for the feedback. I should have done a quick read through
before submitting. I uploaded a new version that corrects the spelling
errors.
I was thinking about also adding a visualizing section along with
table of common graphs. I appreciate the input.
Best wishes,
Rafael
On Thu, Ju
Hi Rafael,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Rafael T
wrote:
> I am not sure if this is right place for this.
This is a good place for discussing about documentation.
> I wrote a quick
> reference for graph theory and I was wondering if you could take a
> look at it and perhaps suggest some ite
Hello,
I am not sure if this is right place for this. I wrote a quick
reference for graph theory and I was wondering if you could take a
look at it and perhaps suggest some items. You can find it here:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/quickref?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=quickref-graphtheory.pdf
Tha
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:06 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Sage Developers,
>> To help with porting Sage to OS X 10.7, I bought 10.7, installed it, and
>> setup a public-facing machine (actually, the old bsd.math.washington.edu)
>> with O
Thank so much for your responses. I will test out the current
functionality and let you know my impression. Please let me know if
you need any more on implementing Coxter groups.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Nicolas Borie
wrote:
> Le dimanche 24 juillet 2011 à 15:38 -0700, Dima Pasechnik a éc
>
>
> I find the two responses here very interesting. From Niles and John's
> responses, it sounds like this feature could help users turn into developers
> as their curiosity about the algorithms gets the better of them and they
> started poking around in the internals of Sage.
>
Would it be pos
On 7/28/11 5:09 AM, John Cremona wrote:
Interesting! I ran this on my script which takes elliptic curves as
computed by eclib (outside Sage, that's a C++ program which already
uses gmp, NTL, pari) and got this list:
['PARI', 'mwrank', 'MPFI', 'Singular', 'FLINT', 'MPFR', 'ginac',
'GMP', 'Magma'
Interesting! I ran this on my script which takes elliptic curves as
computed by eclib (outside Sage, that's a C++ program which already
uses gmp, NTL, pari) and got this list:
['PARI', 'mwrank', 'MPFI', 'Singular', 'FLINT', 'MPFR', 'ginac',
'GMP', 'Magma', 'NTL']
This does not include sympow (wh
On Jul 27, 1:56 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> sage: from sage.misc.citation import get_systems
> sage: get_systems("integrate(cos(x^2), x)")
> ['MPFI', 'ginac', 'GMP', 'Maxima']
>
And it's fun! I have just one publication using Sage, and running
get_systems on my main function returns:
['MPFI',
10 matches
Mail list logo
