Re: [sage-devel] Re: flask.sagenb.org

2011-11-10 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 11/10/11 12:26 PM, William Stein wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tom Boothby >>  wrote: >>> >>> Is it possible to move/merge the OpenID accounts over to sagenb.org? >> >> My understand is:  not without a lot of throwaway prog

[sage-devel] Re: flask.sagenb.org

2011-11-10 Thread Jason Grout
On 11/10/11 12:26 PM, William Stein wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tom Boothby wrote: Is it possible to move/merge the OpenID accounts over to sagenb.org? My understand is: not without a lot of throwaway programming work that nobody wants to do. I just added a big warning to the

Re: [sage-devel] flask.sagenb.org

2011-11-10 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Tom Boothby wrote: > Is it possible to move/merge the OpenID accounts over to sagenb.org? My understand is: not without a lot of throwaway programming work that nobody wants to do. William > >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Jason Grout >> wrote: >>> Is any

Re: [sage-devel] Re: or sage-5.0? (Re: [sage-release] Next release: sage-4.7.3 or sage-4.8?)

2011-11-10 Thread Francois Bissey
> I also use sage-on-gentoo. I find it a very good way to just use sage. > > But i don't only use sage, i also develop it: when there is a feature > i miss, i implement it (if i have the knowledge and time to do so). > The easyest way to do so is to have sage installed in a directory in > the "sta

Re: [sage-devel] flask.sagenb.org

2011-11-10 Thread Tom Boothby
Is it possible to move/merge the OpenID accounts over to sagenb.org? > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Jason Grout > wrote: >> Is anyone using flask.sagenb.org?  It is now an obsolete experiment, since >> the new flask notebook is running on sagenb.org and the cutting-edge flask >> notebook is r

Re: [sage-devel] Sage compilation failure on CentOS 5.7

2011-11-10 Thread Francois Bissey
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Dan Drake wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 at 09:16PM -0500, Daniel Thau wrote: > > > Yeah, I considered that possibility. The md5sum for both the > > > > pre-compiled > > > > > version I tried and the source both matched what they were expected > > > too. > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: or sage-5.0? (Re: [sage-release] Next release: sage-4.7.3 or sage-4.8?)

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/10/2011 11:17 AM, William Stein wrote: > > For many of us, "doing development on Sage" surprisingly often means > modifying more than just the core Sage library. It might mean > tweaking the Cython compiler, changing something in the core of PARI > and seeing what happens, modifying Pynac i

[sage-devel] Re: Update a published notebook

2011-11-10 Thread kcrisman
This is not an elegant solution, but you could do this. 1) Edit your local worksheet. 2) Go to "Edit" and copy everything. 3) Go to the sagenb worksheet and open it. 4) Go to "Edit" and paste the new stuff, replacing the old stuff. 5) Republish. If you had access to sagenb's file system you could

[sage-devel] Update a published notebook

2011-11-10 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi there, I'm usually editing my notebook on my computer using a local server. Some of these notebook are published on sagenb.org. Is there an easy way to update the notebook from my computer ? I can save it and upload it on sagenb but this create a *new* notebook. I can't re-publish it unde

Re: [sage-devel] Re: or sage-5.0? (Re: [sage-release] Next release: sage-4.7.3 or sage-4.8?)

2011-11-10 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 11/10/2011 10:01 AM, mmarco wrote: >> I also use sage-on-gentoo. I find it a very good way to just use sage. >> >> But i don't only use sage, i also develop it: when there is a feature >> i miss, i implement it (if i have the knowledge

Re: [sage-devel] Re: or sage-5.0? (Re: [sage-release] Next release: sage-4.7.3 or sage-4.8?)

2011-11-10 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/10/2011 10:01 AM, mmarco wrote: > I also use sage-on-gentoo. I find it a very good way to just use sage. > > But i don't only use sage, i also develop it: when there is a feature > i miss, i implement it (if i have the knowledge and time to do so). > The easyest way to do so is to have sage

[sage-devel] Re: or sage-5.0? (Re: [sage-release] Next release: sage-4.7.3 or sage-4.8?)

2011-11-10 Thread mmarco
I also use sage-on-gentoo. I find it a very good way to just use sage. But i don't only use sage, i also develop it: when there is a feature i miss, i implement it (if i have the knowledge and time to do so). The easyest way to do so is to have sage installed in a directory in the "standard" way.

Re: [sage-devel] Feedback of update to sagemath 4.7.2 Mandriva rpm package

2011-11-10 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
Em 9 de novembro de 2011 23:27, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade escreveu: > Em 9 de novembro de 2011 23:24, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade > escreveu: > >>  But, since gmpy call to mp_set_memory_functions is kind of redundant, >> as it just ends up calling malloc/realloc/free anyway, with this pat

Re: [sage-devel] Sage compilation failure on CentOS 5.7

2011-11-10 Thread Daniel Thau
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Dan Drake wrote: > On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 at 09:16PM -0500, Daniel Thau wrote: > > Yeah, I considered that possibility. The md5sum for both the > pre-compiled > > version I tried and the source both matched what they were expected too. > > > > $ md5sum sage-4.7.2.ta

[sage-devel] Re: or sage-5.0? (Re: [sage-release] Next release: sage-4.7.3 or sage-4.8?)

2011-11-10 Thread Maarten Derickx
I like your ideas about guest distributions Georg. The missing thing you describe: "a way to tell the host distrubution on what packages we depend" is not really the missing thing. I think a way to make sage configurable to use other external program's instead of spkgs is really the missing th

[sage-devel] Re: A minimal vm

2011-11-10 Thread mmarco
I forgot to mention that buiding sage from source writes the logs of all the building process. Removing them saves a lot of disk space. I think such a thing should also be included in the make micro_release script. On 10 nov, 12:35, mmarco wrote: > Ok, the striped down 1.2 GB virtual machine is a

[sage-devel] Re: A minimal vm

2011-11-10 Thread mmarco
Ok, the striped down 1.2 GB virtual machine is available in the same link. Maybe some unneeded system utilities could still be removed, but i wouldn't expect more than a few dozen MB gained from that. I have noticed that, when running under virtualbox and closing saving the state, everything conti