Hi Anne,
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:09:13PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
Impressive patch! Thanks for working on this.
:-)
Thanks so much for your very useful and quick review. I really
appreciate that!
Followup on http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6588
Cheers,
Christian: I had to slightly rebase
trac_11187-finite_reflection_groups-cs.patch for the doctests I just
added to apply_simple_reflection and friends.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry Isil nthi...@users.sf.net
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this
Hi --
as you are currently discussing root systems (including 6588, thanks a
lot for working on that!): here are some issues that made it very hard
for me to work with root systems for finite reflection groups:
# the first and the second seem to behave very differently:
sage: x =
Dear all,
I am running Sage Version 4.8 with combinat compiled 3 days ago.
I was trying to compute the class of extended B-matices for the principal
coefficients cluster algebra of type $E_8$ and I got the following error.
sage: S=ClusterSeed(['E',8])
sage:
Dear Salvatore,
sage: S=ClusterSeed(['E',8])
sage: T=S.principal_extension()
sage: T.b_matrix_class()
that was a bug in our code (that was there actually from the beginning
on). I hope I fixed it; I pushed the changes, could you please recheck
that you get the right
Dear Christian,
at the moment I am unable to pull: the update fails when applying
trac_6588-categories-root_systems-review-nt.patch
which was pushed to the queue some hours ago.
I will try again shortly and report back.
Thank you for the quick fix
S.
* Christian Stump christian.st...@gmail.com
Sorry I meant there are problem applying
trac_6588-categories-root_systems-review-nt.patch
S.
* Christian Stump christian.st...@gmail.com [2012-03-10 18:43:30]:
Dear Salvatore,
sage: S=ClusterSeed(['E',8])
sage: T=S.principal_extension()
sage: T.b_matrix_class()
Hi Christian,
as you are currently discussing root systems (including 6588, thanks a
lot for working on that!): here are some issues that made it very hard
for me to work with root systems for finite reflection groups:
# the first and the second seem to behave very differently:
sage: x =
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 04:47:50PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 06:51:15AM -0800, Simon King wrote:
Still: Is there a list of available markups?
Florent?
Standard ReST markup:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html
Sphinx specific markup:
Dear Christian,
I can confirm that your patch does the job. It took me some time to veryfy
because I had to install sage 5 (the patch
trac_6588-categories-root_systems-review-nt.patch
does not apply to 4.8 (even to a clean install)
Thank you
S.
* Christian Stump christian.st...@gmail.com
Hi Florent,
On 10 Mrz., 10:07, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@lri.fr wrote:
Standard ReST markup:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html
Sphinx specific markup:
http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/index.html
Thank you!
Simon
--
You received this message because you are
You pretty much are missing the boat on what to do here.
You seem to think you are constrained to return something that Maxima
returns, and simultaneously think that you are building some kind of new
mathematical correct system.
There are two branches to the square root. If you want to
If you want a free open-source implementation of the language (without most
of the mathematical commands)
you can use the one I wrote in Lisp. Mock MMA..
It is not a simple language. One does not often start with a complicated
language and add to it and make
it simpler.
RJF
On Monday,
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be writes:
On 2012-03-09 15:48, Keshav Kini wrote:
I'm probably missing something obvious, but why do you need a repository
in order to apply a patch to files? Doesn't `patch` work
Le samedi 10 mars, William Stein a écrit:
I would like to make this change sometime in the next few months. If
anybody has any thoughts, feel free to share.
You already had my mind with your explanations, but the reduce the use
of disk space by several hundred megabytes totally stole my heart.
On 03/10/2012 08:32 AM, rjf wrote:
You pretty much are missing the boat on what to do here.
You seem to think you are constrained to return something that Maxima
returns, and simultaneously think that you are building some kind of new
mathematical correct system.
There are two branches to the
Did we ever get :trac:, :ticket:, or something similar?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
Hi,
Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
that summarizes the Python 3 support status of the Python packages
that Sage depends on:
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be writes:
On 2012-03-09 15:48, Keshav Kini wrote:
I'm probably missing something obvious, but why do you need a repository
in order to apply a
Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com writes:
Did we ever get :trac:, :ticket:, or something similar?
Yup - http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12490 was merged in
5.0.beta4.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On 3/10/12 9:56 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
that summarizes the Python 3 support status of the Python packages
that Sage depends on:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/10/12 9:56 AM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
that summarizes the Python 3
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
that summarizes the Python 3 support status of the Python packages
that Sage depends on:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Have you ever wondered how difficult it might be to switch Sage from
Python 2.7 to Python 3.x? Some students in my course made a webpage
that summarizes the Python 3 support
On 03/10/2012 11:01 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
Michael Orlitzkymich...@orlitzky.com writes:
Did we ever get :trac:, :ticket:, or something similar?
Yup - http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12490 was merged in
5.0.beta4.
Sweet, I tried it before asking but forgot the backticks. Looks
On 03/04/2012 07:12 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
simplify
...
2. We can replace the existing simplify with,
simplify_factorial -
simplify_trig -
simplify_rational -
simplify_log
which seem to be safe in practice. I like this, because it does actually
try to simplify
On 10 March 2012 13:53, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want a free open-source implementation of the language (without most
of the mathematical commands)
you can use the one I wrote in Lisp. Mock MMA..
It is not a simple language. One does not often start with a complicated
language
On Saturday, March 10, 2012, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 10 March 2012 13:53, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want a free open-source implementation of the language (without
most
of the mathematical commands)
you can use the one I wrote in Lisp. Mock MMA..
It is not
On 03/10/12 06:27 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Saturday, March 10, 2012, David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 10 March 2012 13:53, rjffate...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want a free open-source implementation of the language (without
most
of the mathematical commands)
you can use the
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 7:56 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting examples:
* Matplotlib doesn't support Python 3.x at all yet.
The released version of mpl doesn't, but all the py3 branch has
already been merged into git master. I haven't used it extensively,
but in light
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.support, you wrote:
--Apple-Mail-6-908507845
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I want to install the visualization toolkit vtk into my sage on OS X 10.6.8.
I am running sage 4.8.
Attempting to follow the instructions on
On Sunday, 11 March 2012 13:21:33 UTC+8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.support, you wrote:
--Apple-Mail-6-908507845
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I want to install the visualization toolkit vtk into my sage on OS X
10.6.8. I am running sage 4.8.
32 matches
Mail list logo
