Re: [sage-devel] sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 25/06/2012 22:01, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : I can try for a quick sage-5.2 release, but one month is fairly tight. I also depends a lot on how much troubles we get with the new notebook (and OpenSSL), which will hopefully finally get merged. Beware of OpenSSL and the GPL :

[sage-devel] Re: sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread Keshav Kini
Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net writes: Le 25/06/2012 22:01, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : I can try for a quick sage-5.2 release, but one month is fairly tight. I also depends a lot on how much troubles we get with the new notebook (and OpenSSL), which will hopefully finally get merged.

[sage-devel] coercion vs conversion between polynomial rings

2012-06-27 Thread luisfe
I think that the following behavior is wrong. sage: K=QQ['t,s'] sage: L=QQ['t0,t1,s0,s1'] sage: L.inject_variables() Defining t0, t1, s0, s1 sage: Hom(K,L)([t0+t1,s0]).register_as_coercion() sage: L.coerce_map_from(K) Ring morphism: From: Multivariate Polynomial Ring in t, s over Rational

[sage-devel] Re: Gap packages

2012-06-27 Thread mmarco
Just got a positive answer from the author of mapclass, so i have added it to the package too. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-06-27 11:12, Keshav Kini wrote: We're not shipping OpenSSL, just requiring it as a dependency. We also provide it as an optional supplementary download for those who don't have the authority to install OpenSSL globally on their system. Neither of these have any legal problems AFAIK.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread Volker Braun
Debian is also pretty much the only one who disagrees with this. On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:13:40 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: Neither of these have any legal problems AFAIK. Debian disagrees with this... -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 06/27/12 11:16, Volker Braun wrote: Debian is also pretty much the only one who disagrees with this. On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:13:40 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: Neither of these have any legal problems AFAIK. Debian disagrees with this... Debian wants to ship only

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread Volker Braun
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:24:29 PM UTC+1, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Debian wants to ship only Free Software. If your Free Software requires non-Free software, it ain't Free. This has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Both Apache v1.0 and GPL are Free Software Licenses. They are

[sage-devel] http://sagenb.org

2012-06-27 Thread William Stein
Hello sage-devel/sage-notebook. I'm aware that http://sagenb.org is down, so there is no need for anybody to email me about this. It may be down for some time, due to abusive users.It (or something similar) will definitely be available by the end of the summer. William -- William Stein

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 06/27/12 11:40, Volker Braun wrote: On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:24:29 PM UTC+1, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Debian wants to ship only Free Software. If your Free Software requires non-Free software, it ain't Free. This has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Both Apache v1.0

Re: [sage-devel] coercion vs conversion between polynomial rings

2012-06-27 Thread David Roe
This is a bug in the __call__ method of multivariate polynomial rings, which doesn't respect user-defined coercions. The offending lines are 805-813 in sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx: if isinstance(element, MPolynomial_libsingular) and element.parent() is not self

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: On 06/27/12 11:40, Volker Braun wrote: On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:24:29 PM UTC+1, Michael Orlitzky wrote:     Debian wants to ship only Free Software. If your Free Software requires     non-Free software, it

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-06-27 19:46, William Stein wrote: We indirectly support an *optional* (and little used) feature for the Sage notebook called ssl support, and for people to use it, they must either use the system-wide ssl on their computer or install an optional package themselves. It's not optional,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: On 2012-06-27 19:46, William Stein wrote: We indirectly support an *optional* (and little used) feature for the Sage notebook called ssl support, and for people to use it, they must either use the system-wide ssl on

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage release plan

2012-06-27 Thread Volker Braun
On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 6:25:19 PM UTC+1, Michael Orlitzky wrote: If you combine GPL and GPL-incompatible software and redistribute the result, you have a problem. Not necessarily, this is the System Library exception in the GPL. -- To post to this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] http://sagenb.org

2012-06-27 Thread D. S. McNeil
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:24 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hello sage-devel/sage-notebook. I'm aware that http://sagenb.org is down, so there is no need for anybody to email me about this. It may be down for some time, due to abusive users.    It (or something similar) will

Re: [sage-devel] Bug in nth_root() for finite rings (related to p_adic printing)

2012-06-27 Thread David Roe
Thanks for catching that. #13172 is ready for review. David http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13172 On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Bohua bohuaz...@gmail.com wrote: An example that triggers the bug is: roots = mod(-1, 4489).nth_root(2, all=True) Note 4489=67^2 and 67^2 is the

[sage-devel] How to enable openmp in sage?

2012-06-27 Thread Aurélien
Hello I would like to try some stuff with openmp in sage, however I found no way to enable openmp compiler in sage! Is there a simple way to do it? I read https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/cython-docs/doclinks/1/src/userguide/parallelism.html but I have no idea how to do

[sage-devel] Installing Sage 5.0.1 on Ubuntu 12.04

2012-06-27 Thread Dox
Dear all: I bought a new laptop yesterday, and it has arch. 64-bits. So, I download Sage 5.0.1 for Ubuntu 10.04 although it's running Ubuntu 12.04. After the extraction of the pack, I tried as usual (Since v.3), but I'm getting the error ERROR:root:code for hash md5 was not found. that so

Re: [sage-devel] Installing Sage 5.0.1 on Ubuntu 12.04

2012-06-27 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi Dox, On 27 June 2012 22:16, Dox o.castillo.felis...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all: I bought a new laptop yesterday, and it has arch. 64-bits. So, I download Sage 5.0.1 for Ubuntu 10.04 although it's running Ubuntu 12.04. After the extraction of the pack, I tried as usual (Since v.3), but I'm

Re: [sage-devel] Installing Sage 5.0.1 on Ubuntu 12.04

2012-06-27 Thread Dox
Thank you Jan, It worked. I'll compile the source, but I have a doubt, How many cores are in a i7? 4 or 8? Dox On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 16:49:41 UTC-4, Jan Groenewald wrote: Hi Dox, On 27 June 2012 22:16, Dox wrote: Dear all: I bought a new laptop yesterday, and it has arch. 64-bits.

[sage-devel] Re: sagenb.org down?

2012-06-27 Thread Maarten Derickx
See also https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/sage-devel/RS4SAXz4o_0 Le mardi 26 juin 2012 14:02:13 UTC-4, jason a écrit : On 6/26/12 12:49 PM, Dan Drake wrote: I'm getting a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable from sagenb.org right now (Tuesday, 11:00 am Seattle time). Can

Re: [sage-devel] Installing Sage 5.0.1 on Ubuntu 12.04

2012-06-27 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi On 27 June 2012 23:24, Dox o.castillo.felis...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Jan, It worked. I'll compile the source, but I have a doubt, How many cores are in a i7? 4 or 8? Dox Try grep cores /proc/cpuinfo (or cat /proc/cpuinfo for complete details) or google ;) It can be 2, 4, or 6: