Hi Raniere,
Sorry for the very late reply.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Raniere Gaia Silva
wrote:
> I will implement the Reverse Cuthill-McKee algorithm in the next months and
> think do it as a new Sage feature.
It's awesome that you are thinking about contributing.
> I send a previous
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 3:16:07 PM UTC-7, JBT wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for following up on this. So, I tried your suggestion. Here are a
> few shell lines:
> >$ make
> cd spkg && \
> "../spkg/pipestatus" \
> "env SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD='' ./install all 2>&1" \
> "tee -a ../instal
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:45:10 PM UTC-7, Benjamin Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Benjamin Jones
>
> > I have a macbook-pro running 10.8.2 now, I'll give building 5.3 with
> > the special instructions a shot tomorrow and report back.
> >
> > --
> > Benjamin Jones
On 9/28/12 3:22 PM, Taylor Dupuy wrote:
It would also be nice if there was a better description of why the
notebook was down rather than just a blank error page.
It was probably because of some memory issues. An error page for
yesterday's problems would probably have said something like "the
On 9/28/12 3:24 PM, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
2012/9/28 Taylor Dupuy mailto:taylor.du...@gmail.com>>
What is going on with the public worksheets?
AFAIK they have been disabled for spam reasons.
Spam and malware reasons.
Are they going to be back up soon?
I don't know...
Most l
2012/9/28 Taylor Dupuy
> What is going on with the public worksheets?
>
AFAIK they have been disabled for spam reasons.
> Are they going to be back up soon?
>
I don't know...
Also, yesterday I went to use the sage notebook in my calculus class the
> page was down. I think if sage is to reall
All,
What is going on with the public worksheets? Are they going to be back up
soon? Does someone have a copy of the coercion tutorial worksheet I can use
in the meantime.
Also, yesterday I went to use the sage notebook in my calculus class the
page was down. I think if sage is to really be an
Fernando posted this (below) on the IPython-dev list. This looks like a
really impressive take on how to interact with Python code. It's using
Jython, so not immediately usable for us. But if we could do these
things from the notebook... (I've been thinking a lot about how to do
these sorts
Dear Sage / Sage-Combinat fans,
FPSAC (Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics) is the main
yearly international conference in algebraic combinatorics. It will
happen this year in Paris, June 24th-28th. We are planning to organize
a Sage-Combinat Days as a satellite event the week
Hi
That seems to be make [p]test[all|optional][long]
with optional an alias (equivalent) for all.
It not only fails on the magma tests, it also seems to break the install
quite badly.
Regards,
Jan
On 28 September 2012 15:57, Volker Braun wrote:
> make [p]test[all][long]
>
> p = parallel
> all
Thanks everybody! I've gone ahead and changed the list method to return a
copy rather than a reference. This seemed like the most minimal change I
could make.
Robert, how would I go about returning a list with copy-on-write semantics?
Is there a standard container that does this?
All the best,
make [p]test[all][long]
p = parallel
all = including all optional tests
long = including all tests that take a long time
So its expected that some of make testall fails, eg.g because you don't
have the optional magma installed.
On Friday, September 28, 2012 3:09:00 PM UTC+2, Jan Groenewald wro
Hi
On 27 September 2012 02:17, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 26/09/2012 06:34, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I saw all these errors compiling sage 5.3 from source with make testlong
>> (even more with make testalllong, though they seemed to expect magma to be
>> installed).
>>
>> model name
On 09/28/2012 04:19 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-09-28 05:40, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 09/27/2012 11:13 PM, kcrisman wrote:
But should we be doing that? If you name a variable 'foo', do you want
it to show up in math mode or \mathrm?
Mathematicians don't call variables "foo", they call t
Sorry, I meant bzip2's Makefile in
> /home/zieglerk/local/share/sage/spkg/build/bzip2-1.0.6/src
>
Here it is.
# --
# This file is part of bzip2/libbzip2, a program and library for
# lossless, block-sorting data compression.
#
# bz
On 28/09/12 22:21, Konstantin Ziegler wrote:
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:08:57 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
> Could you attach the makefile.
>
>
> Sure.
>
Sorry, I meant bzip2's Makefile in
/home/zieglerk/local/share/sage/spkg/build/bzip2-1.0.6/src
Francois
--
You received this
On Friday, September 28, 2012 12:08:57 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
> Could you attach the makefile.
Sure.
Google Groups would not let me attach the Makefile ("The uploaded file
Makefile of type application/octet-stream is not allowed."), so I have to
go with copy and paste. Sorry about the
On 28/09/12 21:59, Konstantin Ziegler wrote:
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 11:34:06 AM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
> I am quite intrigued by your error message actually.
>
> > ./bzip2 -1 < sample1.ref > sample1.rb2
> > bzip2: Can't open input file bzip2-1.0.6: No such file or director
On Friday, September 28, 2012 11:34:06 AM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
> I am quite intrigued by your error message actually.
>
> > ./bzip2 -1 < sample1.ref > sample1.rb2
> > bzip2: Can't open input file bzip2-1.0.6: No such file or directory.
> > make[2]: *** [test] Error 1
>
> Are you running ma
I am quite intrigued by your error message actually.
> ./bzip2 -1 < sample1.ref > sample1.rb2
> bzip2: Can't open input file bzip2-1.0.6: No such file or directory.
> make[2]: *** [test] Error 1
Are you running make in parallel (make -jxx)?
Francois
--
You received this message because you ar
On 2012-09-28 10:20, Konstantin Ziegler wrote:
> Do you get the same error message with
>
> (sage-sh) $ ./bzip2 -1 < sample1.ref > sample1.rb2
> (sage-sh) $ bzip2 -1 < sample1.ref > sample1.rb2
> (sage-sh) $ ./bzip2 < sample1.ref > sample1.rb2
> (sage-sh) $ ./bzip2 -1 sample1
On 2012-09-28 10:06, Konstantin Ziegler wrote:
> Error installing package bzip2-1.0.6
Is the error reproducible? What happens if you simply try "make" again?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sa
>
> Do you get the same error message with
>
(sage-sh) $ ./bzip2 -1 < sample1.ref > sample1.rb2
> (sage-sh) $ bzip2 -1 < sample1.ref > sample1.rb2
> (sage-sh) $ ./bzip2 < sample1.ref > sample1.rb2
> (sage-sh) $ ./bzip2 -1 sample1.rb2
>
No errors for any of them.
And what's the output of
On 2012-09-28 05:40, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 09/27/2012 11:13 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> But should we be doing that? If you name a variable 'foo', do you want
> it to show up in math mode or \mathrm?
Mathematicians don't call variables "foo", they call them "f". I don't
see anything against \math
On 2012-09-28 10:06, Konstantin Ziegler wrote:
> gcc -fPIC -O2 -g -o bzip2 bzip2.o -L. -lbz2
>
> Doing 6 tests (3 compress, 3 uncompress) ...
> If there's a problem, things might stop at this point.
>
> ./bzip2 -1 < sample1.ref > sample1.rb2
> bzip2: Can't open input file bzip2-1.0.6: No such
Hi,
Building Sage 5.3 on my 32-bit Ubuntu 12.04 fails early. The process
aborts during the tests for building bzip2. I ran into the same error
message when I first tried upgrading from Sage 4.8 and also later trying to
build Sage 5.2 for comparison. So, it may be just some misconfiguration o
May I remind that this blocker ticket still needs review. I really
think this should be merged.
On 2012-09-21 16:09, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> We should use environment variables LIBRARY_PATH and CPATH to support
> the GCC spkg on recent Debian and Ubuntu systems.
>
> *Blocker* because this causes
27 matches
Mail list logo
