On Sunday, October 21, 2012 10:45:24 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> One problem is that extracting tarballs is inherently dangerous. The
> user who happens to have UID 1237 is able to root the system because of
> this. I'm not sure what to do here...
>
It might be a good idea to untar --n
On 2012-10-21 23:01, Volker Braun wrote:
> He's clearly building as root. While not a great idea, I don't like the
> that the Sage install then dies with an obscure error. If you want to
> compile stuff as root you should be allowed to.
One problem is that extracting tarballs is inherently dangerou
I did notice that, as I stated before. But the function is named
'random seed', which implies it is to seed an RNG, *not* that is in an
RNG. I think this could leave people to conclude the sequence will be
cryptographically sucure. So whilst I'm not disagreeing with what you
say, and agree the do
I will try building without being root, although I think I tried that
initially and got the same error.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this gro
I did try building without being root, but I got the same error. After the
initial attempt I deleted the folder that I got from the tarball and tried
anew.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sag
I did try building without being root, but I got the same error. So I
deleted the folder and unzipped the tarball again. I thought, "Maybe, if I
log in as root, the error will go away."
On Sunday, October 21, 2012 2:01:14 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> He's clearly building as root. While
He's clearly building as root. While not a great idea, I don't like the
that the Sage install then dies with an obscure error. If you want to
compile stuff as root you should be allowed to.
On Sunday, October 21, 2012 9:27:58 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2012-10-21 21:49, miguel wrote
I built as root. (Trying 'make' as root produces the setuptools error.)
Sorry, this is that output of the commands you gave:
root@Paloma:/sage-5.4.rc2# ls -al
/sage-5.4.rc2/spkg/build/setuptools-0.6.16.p0/src
total 224
drwxr-xr-x 6 1237 1237 4096 Oct 21 13:42 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 1237 1237 4096 M
On 2012-10-21 21:49, miguel wrote:
> $ id -a
> uid=1000(miguel) gid=1000(miguel)
> groups=1000(miguel),4(adm),24(cdrom),27(sudo),30(dip),46(plugdev),110(lpadmin),123(sambashare)
Is this the user you used to build Sage, or did you build as root?
--
You received this message because you are subscri
$ ls -al /sage-5.4.rc2/spkg/build/setuptools-0.6.16.p0/src
total 224
drwxr-xr-x 6 1237 1237 4096 Oct 21 12:07 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 1237 1237 4096 May 14 05:50 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 1237 1237 9265 May 20 2011 CHANGES.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 1237 1237 412 May 20 2011 CONTRIBUTORS.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 1237 1237 62
On 2012-10-21 21:17, miguel wrote:
> The link to ubuntuforums did reveal what was happening!
>
> I have tried to compile 5.4rc2, and upon getting
> to setuptools-0.6.16.p0.spkg, I get the following error:
>
> patching file setuptools/command/easy_install.py
>
> sys:1: RuntimeWarning: no
The link to ubuntuforums did reveal what was happening!
I have tried to compile 5.4rc2, and upon getting
to setuptools-0.6.16.p0.spkg, I get the following error:
patching file setuptools/command/easy_install.py
> sys:1: RuntimeWarning: not adding directory
>> '/sage-5.4.rc2/spkg/build/setupto
On Oct 21, 4:03 am, mmarco wrote:
> That was my first idea when i encountered these problems. But then,
> things like primary decomposition rely on factorization of
> polynomials... which will differ a lot from QQbar to an algebraic
> extension of Q.
Indeed. Data point: Magma does allow QQbar as
I did notice that, but what's the point of a random seed? I think this
could leave people to conclude the sequence will be cryptographically
sucure. So whilst I'm not disagreeing with what you say, and agree the
documetation is correct in what it says, I believe there's a big
chance for confusion.
On 2012-10-21, David Kirkby wrote:
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/misc/randstate.html
>
> says:
>
> "If set_random_seed() is called with no arguments, then a new seed is
> automatically selected. On operating systems that support it, the new
> seed comes from os.urandom(); this is in
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sage/misc/randstate.html
says:
"If set_random_seed() is called with no arguments, then a new seed is
automatically selected. On operating systems that support it, the new
seed comes from os.urandom(); this is intended to be a truly random
(not pseudo-random),
That was my first idea when i encountered these problems. But then,
things like primary decomposition rely on factorization of
polynomials... which will differ a lot from QQbar to an algebraic
extension of Q.
I also thought of the aproach of translating my polynomials to a
common extension and the
17 matches
Mail list logo
