I will likely attend.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:47 AM, tom d sdent...@gmail.com wrote:
It's looking like there's a good chance that I'll be able to come through!
On Friday, September 28, 2012 11:12:05 AM UTC+3, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
Dear Sage / Sage-Combinat fans,
FPSAC (Formal
Me 2!
Anne
On 12/1/12 9:08 PM, Chris Berg wrote:
I will likely attend.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:47 AM, tom d sdent...@gmail.com wrote:
It's looking like there's a good chance that I'll be able to come through!
On Friday, September 28, 2012 11:12:05 AM UTC+3, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
This is the result from the Terminal equivalent (system_profiler
-detailLevel full SPSoftwareDataType SPHardwareDataType) since I am not
physically at the computer, nor will I be again until Monday. If there is
data missing that is expected, I can attempt to retrieve it specifically.
- Greg
Hi,
Is anyone else running the notebook on sage-5.5rc0? I am unable to run
the notebook and instead get this error:
...s/sage-5.5.rc0/devel/sage» sage -n
--
| Sage Version 5.5.rc0, Release Date: 2012-11-17
On 2012-12-01, P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone else running the notebook on sage-5.5rc0? I am unable to run
the notebook and instead get this error:
...s/sage-5.5.rc0/devel/sage» sage -n
--
| Sage
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 9:45:23 AM UTC, P Purkayastha wrote:
On the other hand, if I run sage first and then type notebook() from
inside sage, then it works and I get no errors. Somewhere an import is
not being performed when sage -n is being run.
No, too many imports are being
You can see the source code for anything with two questionmarks:
sage: integrate??
You can search with
sage: search_src('integrate')
Inheritance tree:
sage: class_graph(Integer).plot()
The general coding conventions and tracing/debugging are basically the same
as in Python, so
On 12/1/12 5:26 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 9:45:23 AM UTC, P Purkayastha wrote:
On the other hand, if I run sage first and then type notebook() from
inside sage, then it works and I get no errors. Somewhere an import is
not being performed when sage -n is
On 12/1/12 1:08 AM, Wai Man Chung wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if Sage will go to implement some specific module
for application ?
e.g. Signal processing, Bioinformatics, Queuing networks, computational
linguistics, etc.
I think implementation of modules in specific areas is worthy to
On 12/01/2012 07:46 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
That looks like it's only happening here:
https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/blob/master/sagenb/misc/misc.py#L185
If you change that, does it take care of the error?
If I comment out that line, then it leads to segmentation fault on sage
-n and the
On 12/01/2012 07:46 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 12/1/12 5:26 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 9:45:23 AM UTC, P Purkayastha wrote:
On the other hand, if I run sage first and then type notebook() from
inside sage, then it works and I get no errors. Somewhere an
import
I don't think monicize is a word. For polynomials, the function in
Sage is called .monic():
sage: x=polygen(QQ)
sage: p=3*x+1
sage: p.monic()
x + 1/3
but I have also never heard of the use of monic for vectors. In any
case, there are (at least) two possible normalizations, depending on
whether
Hi,
I need help from a Fedora packager for the proper review procedures.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877651
I am asking because people searching for a review will most likely
run away when looking at it due to the complexity :-) and it is better
to have someone with
/home/punarbasu/Installations/sage-5.5.rc0/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/interacts/library.py,
line 87, in module
title = text_control('h2Taylor polynomial/h2'),
NameError: name 'text_control' is not defined
Yup, same error on a more or less vanilla 5.5.rc0. Yikes.
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 10:14:28 AM UTC+1, Greg McWhirter wrote:
This is the result from the Terminal equivalent (system_profiler
-detailLevel full SPSoftwareDataType SPHardwareDataType) since I am not
physically at the computer, nor will I be again until Monday. If there is
data
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 1:45:23 AM UTC-8, P Purkayastha wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone else running the notebook on sage-5.5rc0? I am unable to run
the notebook and instead get this error:
[snip]
NameError: name 'text_control' is not defined
I have installed atlas-3.10 (because
Hmm, I think I agree.
Why does leading_coefficient() behave backwards anyway?
On Saturday, 1 December 2012 04:44:10 UTC-8, John Cremona wrote:
I don't think monicize is a word. For polynomials, the function in
Sage is called .monic():
sage: x=polygen(QQ)
sage: p=3*x+1
sage: p.monic()
If it is implemented it seems to be very useful for engineers. Numerical tools
have some limit for advanced computation. Hence if sage supports for those
applications, it will be highly interesting to many scientific area
researchers.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
for example. I'm surprised this hasn't been an issue before. In ticket
#11409, there are some patches to fix this.
While mistyping this, I discovered that a lot of ticket do not exist.
E.g. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11044 and many, many
others. Why? Presumably not
On 1 December 2012 19:29, Eviatar eviatarb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, I think I agree.
Why does leading_coefficient() behave backwards anyway?
Here's a plausible guess: think of polynomials which are determined
by a list of coefficients in which te i'th element of the list,
starting at 0,
kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com writes:
While mistyping this, I discovered that a lot of ticket do not
exist. E.g. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11044 and
many, many others. Why? Presumably not because they are
duplicates.
Didn't we at some point have spam tickets that got
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 4:21:38 PM UTC-5, Keshav Kini wrote:
kcrisman kcri...@gmail.com javascript: writes:
While mistyping this, I discovered that a lot of ticket do not
exist. E.g. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11044 and
many, many others. Why? Presumably not
On Dec 1, 12:08 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
This makes it hard to see why projective coordinates are normalised
sage: ProjectiveSpace(QQ,2)(list(v))
(2/5 : 3/5 : 1)
I think this has its roots in mathematical tradition. Taking
coordinates (x,y) on affine space and
Yes. I think researcher in linguistics may also be interested if
computational linguistics module is in Sage.
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 6:58:39 PM UTC+8, James S. Kim wrote:
If it is implemented it seems to be very useful for engineers. Numerical
tools have some limit for advanced
Hi,
Will any application specific modules written in Python easily integrate
with Sage ?
If so, it may be worth considering to log a trac ticket to follow up this.
Are there complexities to consider ? e.g. any license issue ? Or is there
any code
synchronization issue ? (e.g. if the module in
25 matches
Mail list logo
