On Thursday, December 26, 2013 7:38:22 AM UTC-5, Maarten Derickx wrote:
>
> It is now at: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/coding_basics.html
>
> The name of the url changed, but if you look at the index
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/index.html you can still easily
> find it.
>
>
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
I've been working on a "git trac" subcommand to complement the git suite
> with trac integration instead of the separate UI that the sage -dev scripts
> present. This project is the basis for my release management scripts, so I
> have been eati
maldun writes:
> And I have another question: why github? afaik bitbucket would allow
> to use both git and mercurial. So it is possible for users to submit
> a mercurial patch on a git repo and vice versa. I think this would
> avoid a lot of compability issues.
I've never heard of such a featur
Reviewing spkgs used to be really painful--you had to unpack the new
spkg and the old one and compare them manually, make sure the repo was
up-to-date, the src/ was unmodified upstream, SPKG.txt had a
(redundant) changelog entry, look at the patch files, etc. Also,
rebuilding Sage to test a package
Thank's that's fixed. I've only seen it now since I cannot read all emails.
Hence, in the future CC me or just email me directly about such small bugs.
Harald
On Monday, December 23, 2013 9:02:58 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> It seems that http://www.sagemath.org/upstream lacks packages
You can do a custom query (http://trac.sagemath.org/query but you can
find it under the "View tickets" tab) with the status being needs_review
and the component as "packages: standard".
Best,
Travis
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 3:38:12 PM UTC-8, François wrote:
>
> Yes it is. But it is no
That reminds me of one thing that I wanted to mention... I'm of course
assuming that the package comes from either the maintainer (see SPKG.txt)
or somebody whom I trust to have the technical abilities. In any case I'll
always have a quick look...
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:39:56 AM UTC
Am Mittwoch, 25. Dezember 2013 20:40:41 UTC schrieb Thierry
(sage-googlesucks@xxx):
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 02:07:12PM -0800, Emil Widmann wrote:
> > I am trying to build the latest sage release with the possible goal of
> > releasing another Live image version (USB/CD/HD disk ima
>
> How about a slight twist on the first option:
>
> [X] Have a whitelist of developers who are allowed to post an updated
> package and set them to positive review immediately (listing themselves as
> reviewers) because they judge the update to be trivial and in no need of
> discussion
>
> It
It is now at: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/coding_basics.html
The name of the url changed, but if you look at the
index http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/index.html you can still easily
find it.
Le mercredi 25 décembre 2013 16:32:22 UTC+1, Darij Grinberg a écrit :
>
> Hi guys,
>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
