Re: [sage-devel] 6.2.rc0 crashed on startup

> Thanks for your help! I attach the report -- I upgraded from 6.2.beta4 if > I remember right. I will redo the make, but that will take until tomorrow > morning... > I just typed the last line of the crash report into google and see that it was discussed before in sage-release: https://grou

Re: [sage-devel] 6.2.rc0 crashed on startup

> Please, put the log somewhere accessible to everybody. > From which version did you upgrade? Sometimes, the build system is not > smart enough and it is needed to do a "make distclean" and then > "make"... i.e. rebuilding Sage from scratch. > Thanks for your help! I attach the report --

Re: [sage-devel] 6.2.rc0 crashed on startup

Hi Christian, Please, put the log somewhere accessible to everybody. >From which version did you upgrade? Sometimes, the build system is not smart enough and it is needed to do a "make distclean" and then "make"... i.e. rebuilding Sage from scratch. 2014-04-24 22:34 UTC+02:00, Christian Stump :

Re: [sage-devel] 6.2.rc0 crashed on startup

> > Why using "make start" instead of "make"? >> > > (doing it currently, but it takes some time.) I thought that's the same, > except that I save the time of building the documentation. Isn't that right? > okay, it finished -- but the error on startup remained... any ideas? Thanks again, Chri

Re: [sage-devel] 6.2.rc0 crashed on startup

> > Why using "make start" instead of "make"? > (doing it currently, but it takes some time.) I thought that's the same, except that I save the time of building the documentation. Isn't that right? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-de

Re: [sage-devel] 6.2.rc0 crashed on startup

Why using "make start" instead of "make"? 2014-04-24 21:56 UTC+02:00, Christian Stump : > Hi, > > I just pulled the newest develop version and did "make start". Now, I get > the error below. Am I again doing something wrong here? > > Thanks for your help, > > Christian > >

[sage-devel] 6.2.rc0 crashed on startup

Hi, I just pulled the newest develop version and did "make start". Now, I get the error below. Am I again doing something wrong here? Thanks for your help, Christian --- -- stumpc5@stumpc5:~/progs/sage$ sage ┌─

Re: [sage-devel] moved wiki.sagemath.org to vm

Ok, I installed docutils and the page renders correctly now. -Keith On Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:42:20 AM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote: > > Hi Keith! > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 01:31:07PM -0700, Keith Clawson wrote: > >I just finished moving wiki.sagemath.org from boxen to a ded

Re: [sage-devel] Re: script that changes source code

On Thursday, April 24, 2014 4:01:07 PM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: > > The point is that #16216 modifies 179 files (9.2% of the files in Sage > source code) in a somewhat trivial way. I am pretty sure that we can > not avoid merge conflicts. The real question is: what is the best > strategy for it

[sage-devel] Re: Difficulty with Galois group

On Saturday, 19 April 2014 11:46:21 UTC+1, KnS wrote: > > Hello sage-devel: > > I am trying to prepare a notebook for a SAGE demo at my institute. In > rying to compute the Galois group, I am stuck here. SAGE complains that I > have to install KASH while I already have KASH installed. > > > s

Re: [sage-devel] Re: git merge: good practice

On Thursday, April 24, 2014 12:43:05 AM UTC-4, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > Also, ccache is your friend if you want to cut compile times a lot > here (and elsewhere). > > With regard to which, see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14372 for the opportunity to actually document this somewhere in th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: script that changes source code

2014-04-24 16:10 UTC+02:00, Volker Braun : > On Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:48:19 PM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: >> >> 1') Would it be possible to have access to the very last commit before >> the stable version? > > > The last commit might always change before it is released, so i don't > really see w

Re: [sage-devel] Re: script that changes source code

On Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:48:19 PM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: > > 1') Would it be possible to have access to the very last commit before > the stable version? The last commit might always change before it is released, so i don't really see why you want that. You can talk to me if your ticket

Re: [sage-devel] Re: script that changes source code

Thanks Volker. 2014-04-24 15:38 UTC+02:00, Volker Braun : > On Thursday, April 24, 2014 9:37:14 AM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: >> >> 1) it is possible instead of a branch, to provide a simple script that >> would be applied to the source files >> > > No 1') Would it be possible to have access to the

[sage-devel] Re: script that changes source code

On Thursday, April 24, 2014 9:37:14 AM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: > > 1) it is possible instead of a branch, to provide a simple script that > would be applied to the source files > No > 2) it is possible to provide a simple script that would be tested for > each future branch merge (typically

Re: [sage-devel] Re: PPA dependencies

Hi This seems to be a holdup: Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote on 2012-10-13: #11 The change that has been uploaded to precise-proposed looks appropriate for an SRU, but this bug is missin

Re: [sage-devel] vote: include pip with sage

I guess some package management would be an improvement from the present situation. the fact it only works for python packages is a bit half baked but it is a good step in my opinion. As far as I can tell this means that once we have bootstrapped pip we can simplify spkg-install for python package

Re: [sage-devel] moved wiki.sagemath.org to vm

Hi Keith! On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 01:31:07PM -0700, Keith Clawson wrote: >I just finished moving wiki.sagemath.org from boxen to a dedicated virtual >machine. The only noticeable change should be that I renamed >MyStartingPage to SageWiki (there's a redirect so this shouldn't b

[sage-devel] Re: PPA dependencies

Jan Groenewald wrote: Do you have a URL for me of the bug / fixes? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6/+bug/968766 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6/+bug/972648 -leif On 20 April 2014 16:26, leif mailto:not.rea...@online.de>> wrote: Jan Groenewald wrote:

[sage-devel] Re: script that changes source code

That could / should be part of a more comprehensive approach: check for PEP8 / other guideline violations. Such a script might be supplied by Sage. It could even be a git pre-commit hook (but I would consider this too extreme :-) Wilfried -- You received this message because you are subscribe

[sage-devel] script that changes source code

Hi, I was reading #16216 and I was wondering whether 1) it is possible instead of a branch, to provide a simple script that would be applied to the source files 2) it is possible to provide a simple script that would be tested for each future branch merge (typically after #16216 it would be bett

Re: [sage-devel] vote: include pip with sage

Question: would this make it possible to automatically have certain python packages installed when Sage builds (after building its python of course), perhaps from a list kept in a config file in .sage/ ? I have a list of packages I use a lot (for the lmfdb project), e.g. pymongo, and it is a nuisa

Re: [sage-devel] vote: include pip with sage

Hi On 24 April 2014 09:44, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2014-04-24 00:46, William Stein wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There used to be a lot of confusion about which package manager / >> installer one should use with python -- easy_install? setuptools? >> etc. >> >> Now the choice is clear: pip -- A too

Re: [sage-devel] vote: include pip with sage

On 2014-04-24 00:46, William Stein wrote: Hi, There used to be a lot of confusion about which package manager / installer one should use with python -- easy_install? setuptools? etc. Now the choice is clear: pip -- A tool for installing and managing Python packages. Does pip supersede setuptoo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: PPA dependencies

Hi Leif, Do you have a URL for me of the bug / fixes? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.6 Regards, Jan On 20 April 2014 16:26, leif wrote: > Jan Groenewald wrote: > >> On 20 April 2014 14:50, leif > > wrote: >> > > P.S.: Beat the Ubuntu guys f