You need to define a new __setstate__ method that allows for the old and
new way of doing things. Something like:
if isinstance(state, dict): # for old pickles from Partition_class
self._set_parent(_Partitions)
self.__dict__ = state
else:
self._set_paren
Hello sage-devel,
at #11895 I'm trying to make p-adic numbers unhashable. This works
nicely except for one pickle from the pickle jar that I can't seem to
fix.
The problem is that DirichletGroup_class used to have a dict which uses
p-adic numbers as keys. That dict used to be a cache which is not
Hi,
Le 12/05/2014 11:45, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit :
Le vendredi 9 mai 2014 18:31:02 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
On 2014-05-09, Volker Braun > wrote:
We do have a arm machine in Oxford with more than enough ram (afair
4GB).
Dima did some work on finishing the arm port. In any case,
On 12 May 2014 16:58, "John Cremona" wrote:
>
> I'm sure that rtf did not mean to provide the physical machine, just the
information about the machine (hardware and os, say)!
>
> John
..k
"(Provide to whom? )"
>
> On 12 May 2014 16:51, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10 May 2014 17:37, "rjf"
That will provide only the sage library, not the whole distribution. I
think if people are going to download from the sagemath site, they are
probably looking for the whole distribution, with all the packages needed
to compile offline.
On Monday, May 12, 2014 1:03:05 AM UTC+8, leif wrote:
>
>
Most of this time is spent in gcc. This can be seen if you grep the log
file for "Finished Cythonizing". The commands following it are all gcc/g++
commands.
On Monday, May 12, 2014 7:30:20 PM UTC+8, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Is the time spent in gcc or in Cython or both?
>
>
> On Monday, May 12, 2
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> On 10 May 2014 17:37, "rjf" wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> It seems to me that the "reproducibility" should be with respect to the
>> same conditions as the original publication. That is, someone who says
>> "I'm telling the truth because yada yad
I'm sure that rtf did not mean to provide the physical machine, just the
information about the machine (hardware and os, say)!
John
On 12 May 2014 16:51, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> On 10 May 2014 17:37, "rjf" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > It seems to me that the "reproducibility" should be with res
On 10 May 2014 17:37, "rjf" wrote:
>
>
>
> It seems to me that the "reproducibility" should be with respect to the
same conditions as the original publication. That is, someone who says
"I'm telling the truth because yada yada Sage version x.y.z on machine
q.p should provide not only the co
>
> Singular 4-0-0 is the result of that big refactoring effort, right?
>
yes, partly. The refactoring still continues.
Olexandr Motsak told be that the released version is a beta and he had no
idea about a date for the official release.
We'll see if the team is brave enough for due major cha
Vincent Knight wrote:
I have raised the 3 tickets here:
- http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16331#ticket
- http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16332#ticket
- http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16333#ticket
I have put them under the 'relocation' component as I'm hoping that a
result of these 3 tickets wo
This fixes some critical bugs in comparison with infinities
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to thi
Is the time spent in gcc or in Cython or both?
On Monday, May 12, 2014 12:54:23 PM UTC+2, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
> Here is some more information. I checked out ticket/16325 and it differs
> from develop by only two commits to a single file.
>
> ~/Installations/sage-git» git l -n 3
> * 2ecec6b -
On Monday, May 12, 2014 6:54:23 PM UTC+8, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
> The time required (4 min) is much better than yesterday, but still too
> long. Is this to be expected? The log file sage.log is attached.
>
> A copy of all the files is kept in src/build/lib.* - can it not just check
> the diff
Try "sage -ba". If it is not very fast, tell us why cycache is not working
on your machine.
On Monday, May 12, 2014 12:13:31 PM UTC+2, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
> All of this was on 6.3.beta0
> On May 12, 2014 5:46 PM, "Volker Braun" >
> wrote:
>
>> With ccache and cycache the recompliation time
All of this was on 6.3.beta0
On May 12, 2014 5:46 PM, "Volker Braun" wrote:
> With ccache and cycache the recompliation time of extension modules is
> negligible. Should work automatically for Sage >= 6.2.rc0
>
>
> On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:36:20 AM UTC+2, P Purkayastha wrote:
>>
>> Yes, this is
Arm might soon be a major player in the low-power server market, see e.g.
the recent Opteron A1100 announcement.
On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:45:12 AM UTC+2, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>
> > We do have a arm machine in Oxford with more than enough ram (afair
>> 4GB).
>> > Dima did some work on
With ccache and cycache the recompliation time of extension modules is
negligible. Should work automatically for Sage >= 6.2.rc0
On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:36:20 AM UTC+2, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
> Yes, this is set. I tried it again just now. I changed to develop using
>
> git checkout develop
>
Le vendredi 9 mai 2014 18:31:02 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> On 2014-05-09, Volker Braun > wrote:
> > We do have a arm machine in Oxford with more than enough ram (afair
> 4GB).
> > Dima did some work on finishing the arm port. In any case, its not a ram
> > issue.
> indeed. Please re
Yes, this is set. I tried it again just now. I changed to develop using
git checkout develop
and re-ran the upgrade process. It shouldn't have upgraded anything, but it
still decided to compile a bunch of packages anyway. Thankfully, it found
most in ccache, except for R. But for sage, the foll
I have raised the 3 tickets here:
- http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16331#ticket
- http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16332#ticket
- http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16333#ticket
I have put them under the 'relocation' component as I'm hoping that a
result of these 3 tickets would be a new component
21 matches
Mail list logo
