2014-11-29 20:30 GMT+00:00 Joni-Pekka Kurronen :
...
> (sage-sh) root@mpi1:src$
...
Are you compiling as root? Try compiling as a non-root user; Python
refuses some things when run as root as a security precaution.
Regards,
Erik Massop
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
hi,
6.3 complies ok but 6.4 dose not!
cd /home/sageserver/sage-6.4/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pynac-0.3.2
and
autoreconf -i --force
checking for python... /home/sageserver/sage-6.4/local/bin/python
checking for a version of Python >= '2.1.0'... sys:1: RuntimeWarning: not
adding directory '' to s
On 2014-11-29, Volker Braun wrote:
> --=_Part_66_1749519742.1417259350569
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="=_Part_67_832209070.1417259350569"
>
> --=_Part_67_832209070.1417259350569
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> On Friday, November 28, 2014 4:58
Hi,
i did as you said and it worked.
Thank you for your help.
Patxi.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co
Hi,
i did the compilation in a folder with only ascii caracters and it worked.
Thank you for your help.
Patxi
Le mercredi 26 novembre 2014 21:17:27 UTC+1, François a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> A bit of a shot in the dark but could you try it from a folder with
> only ascii characters? "Telechargemen
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 2014-11-15, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I guess the upgrade to patch broke more optional packages:
>>
>> sage -i normaliz
>> ...
>>
>> gcc version 4.8.2 (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1)
>> **
On 2014-11-29, Tom Boothby wrote:
> The irony of this is staggering, if not surprising. +1
"Gentlemen! You can't fight in here -- this is the War Room."
quotably,
Robert Dodier
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe f
The irony of this is staggering, if not surprising. +1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this gr
+1
As already said in an other thread: I don't understand this high waves of
emotion, and I don't think it is healthy
for the community
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
On 11/29/14, 6:58, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
Discussions on this are not going in a positive direction. The tone of
the discussions is far worst than anything I have seen on here in a
long time.
I think it would be best if everyone stopped discussing it for a
couple of weeks
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:40:16PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 06:09:44AM +0100, Thierry wrote:
> > OK, sorry if i misunderstood, you seemed to support a vote about that
> > (even proposing a third alternative name) since your message was:
>
> A *poll*, not a *vo
Hi,
+1
Thanks for this proposition, i definitely agree with that (though i was
part of the mess), and i will not post on this subject on sage-devel for
the next two weeks. Mailing-list (which require quick response) seems not
the appropriate format to discuss such issues.
Ciao,
Thierry
On Sat
Hi David, hi John,
On 2014-11-29, John Cremona wrote:
> On 29 November 2014 at 11:58, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
> wrote:
>> Discussions on this are not going in a positive direction. The tone of
>> the discussions is far worst than anything I have seen on here in a
>> long time.
>
>
On 29 November 2014 at 11:58, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
wrote:
> Discussions on this are not going in a positive direction. The tone of
> the discussions is far worst than anything I have seen on here in a
> long time.
I entirely agree. This has been worse than anything which has b
Discussions on this are not going in a positive direction. The tone of
the discussions is far worst than anything I have seen on here in a
long time.
I think it would be best if everyone stopped discussing it for a
couple of weeks, and revisited it later (I propose Monday the 15th
December).
Mayb
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:18:26PM +, Simon King wrote:
> If I understand correctly what William and Volker are saying, they claim
> it is too late for a change anyway,
Please reread. William has explicitly, and in several emails, stated
the converse.
Cheers,
N
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 06:09:44AM +0100, Thierry wrote:
> OK, sorry if i misunderstood, you seemed to support a vote about that
> (even proposing a third alternative name) since your message was:
A *poll*, not a *vote*. A poll sounds useful to get a sense of where
the community stands to know bet
On Friday, November 28, 2014 4:58:35 PM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > Let me try a last time, just replace code with book:
> If you want to understand how I feel about that name, add
> to that doc a subtitle "Mein Kampf" :-)
>
How about "Godwin's Law": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27
18 matches
Mail list logo
