In the thread
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/0eDV-fbXXyE
somebody on 32-bit x86 Debian Linux couldn't compile Sage due to an
outdated assembler not supporting the rep ret instruction which our
GCC-4.9.2 generates.
According to
On Thursday, December 18, 2014 12:47:31 PM UTC, martin@gmx.net wrote:
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 11:14:35 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
However, I wonder if there is a more elegant solution: is
there currently a way to determine whether a given Parent class
models
On 2014-12-19, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
In the thread
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/0eDV-fbXXyE
somebody on 32-bit x86 Debian Linux couldn't compile Sage due to an
outdated assembler not supporting the rep ret instruction which our
GCC-4.9.2
On Friday, December 19, 2014 10:25:26 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
It's quite possible that both of those were written by me, since I did
write code which had to distinguish between real and complex places. The
number of different real fields which people might use is rather large,
and
While preparing examples with Gaussian Integers for an undergraduate
course I discovered this terrible bug:
sage: Zi.i = ZZ.extension(x^2+1)
sage: (123+456*i)/3
193
I note that the type of Zi here is Order in Number Field in i with
defining polynomial x^2 + 1 (not maximal order which might be
The bug doesn't seem to be in division:
sage: Zi.i = ZZ.extension(x^2+1)
sage: i
1
sage: 123+456*i
579
Bruno
2014-12-19 12:14 GMT+01:00 John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com:
While preparing examples with Gaussian Integers for an undergraduate
course I discovered this terrible bug:
sage:
This is http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15348
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send
Hi!
With the latest develop, make start fails to build maxima. The log is
at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/SimonKing/logs/maxima-5.35.1.p0.log
Two things are very strange:
1. even though building the spkg failed, the build process was
continued. And Sage even starts! And does not crash
On 2014-12-19 12:54, Simon King wrote:
1. even though building the spkg failed, the build process was
continued.
Are you sure? Keep in mind that, for parallel builds, other packages
which were being built are still continued. Imagine that you are
installing Maxima and R in parallel. When
The build failure should be fixed by http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17525
Peter
Op vrijdag 19 december 2014 12:54:37 UTC+1 schreef Simon King:
Hi!
With the latest develop, make start fails to build maxima. The log is
at
Hi Peter,
On 2014-12-19, Peter Bruin pjbr...@gmail.com wrote:
The build failure should be fixed by http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17525
Thank you! For now, I attempted to fix the problem by installing automake,
since the ticket says that the build fails if automake is missing.
Best regards,
Hi Jeroen,
On 2014-12-19, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2014-12-19 12:54, Simon King wrote:
1. even though building the spkg failed, the build process was
continued.
Are you sure? Keep in mind that, for parallel builds, other packages
which were being built are still
Hi Peter,
On 2014-12-19, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
On 2014-12-19, Peter Bruin pjbr...@gmail.com wrote:
The build failure should be fixed by http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17525
Thank you! For now, I attempted to fix the problem by installing automake,
since the ticket says
Hi!
On 2014-12-19, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
So, make will report *all* errors that have ever been recorded in the
install log? Not a good solution, I think.
Note that deleting install.log has not been enough to remove the
warning. Apparently it is needed to remove logs/pkgs/...
On 2014-12-19, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014-12-19, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
In the thread
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/0eDV-fbXXyE
somebody on 32-bit x86 Debian Linux couldn't compile Sage due to an
outdated assembler not
So, sage will keep reporting all failed build attempts that have ever
happened in the past and that have not been followed by a successful
build of (a more recent version of) the same package.
Yeah, I was wondering about that too.
--
You received this message because you are
Hi Simon,
Sigh. Even after installing automake 1.13.4, the maxima spkg refuses to
build. However, sage still starts.
Yes, one annoying thing is that you specifically need Automake 1.11.
Peter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
Hi all,
See http://trac.sagemath.org/report/30 for the 283 tickets currently
needing review. Wow!
I want to encourage people to take a little time to look at these, because
I think that many of them are either painfully easy to review, or in fact
are not needing review at all.
Painfully
On 2014-12-19 13:59, Simon King wrote:
So, sage will keep reporting all failed build attempts that have ever
happened in the past and that have not been followed by a successful
build of (a more recent version of) the same package.
Whether it's a good idea or not, that's indeed the case.
--
On 2014-12-19 13:46, Simon King wrote:
Here is the log:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/SimonKing/logs/install-6.5.b3.log
Note that it ended with byte-compiling a lot of stuff from the Sage
library. Seems unlikely to me that this was done parallel to building
maxima...
Why unlikely?
I've changed recently the status of a ticket to needs review since I
think it is not relevant anymore, and I wanted it to be closed. I now
guess it is not the right approach... What should I do in such a case?
For concreteness it is ticket #2907
(http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/2907) that
On Friday, December 19, 2014 4:03:44 PM UTC+1, Bruno Grenet wrote:
I've changed recently the status of a ticket to needs review since I
think it is not relevant anymore, and I wanted it to be closed. I now
guess it is not the right approach... What should I do in such a case?
Put it to
this is an easy review!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
another trivial review!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi Peter,
On 2014-12-19, Peter Bruin pjbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sigh. Even after installing automake 1.13.4, the maxima spkg refuses to
build. However, sage still starts.
Yes, one annoying thing is that you specifically need Automake 1.11.
Amazing.
Anyway: With #17525 applied, maxima
Hi Nathann,
On 2014-12-18, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
So something like:
- Big speedup on all architectures -- timings
- Comparable results -- a big red warning or a note saying try for
yourself, we don't know your hardware
That sounds like a reasonable rule of thumb.
26 matches
Mail list logo
