Re: [sage-devel] MathJax limit for TeX expression in notebook

Hi, see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18577 Could you please tell if it fixes your real-life examples (both in sagenb and ipython notebooks) ? Ciao, Thierry On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:57:19AM -0700, Michal Bejger wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > Using SageManifolds, I can produce long equations q

Re: [sage-devel] Full-time Sage developer position opening at Université Paris-Sud for Fall 2015

On Monday, June 1, 2015, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > Dear Sage developers, > > This is a preliminary announcement for a full time Sage developer > position ... the first such position ever! :-) > opening at Université Paris-Sud, funded by OpenDreamKit: > > http://opendreamkit.org/2

[sage-devel] Build problem of zeromq-4.0.5 on 32-bit SPARC processor running Solaris.

After my recent failure to build Sage with the gcc on my system (4.5.0), I tried to use Sage's built in gcc (4.9.2), which worked until it tried to build the package zeromq-4.0.5, which I think is a standard package added since I last built Sage on Solaris. I believe this is an upstream bug, and h

[sage-devel] Re: "The SageMath Foundation"

On Monday, 1 June 2015 14:22:47 UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: > > >> What is the goal of this organization and the relationship with the >> organization that runs SMC? Perhaps a question to the lawyers about the >> coexistence of the two organizations might be a good idea? >> > > I think that is a ve

[sage-devel] Full-time Sage developer position opening at Université Paris-Sud for Fall 2015

Dear Sage developers, This is a preliminary announcement for a full time Sage developer position opening at Université Paris-Sud, funded by OpenDreamKit: http://opendreamkit.org/2015/05/22/developer-position-paris-sud/ A formal announcement will be posted there in the coming days, in p

Re: [sage-devel] Re: "The SageMath Foundation"

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:22 AM, kcrisman wrote: >> >> What is the goal of this organization and the relationship with the >> organization that runs SMC? Perhaps a question to the lawyers about the >> coexistence of the two organizations might be a good idea? > > > I think that is a very good quest

Re: [sage-devel] "The SageMath Foundation"

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Franco Saliola wrote: > Hey William, > > What is the goal of this organization and the relationship with the > organization that runs SMC? That is the nontrivial question. It's what a lot of the application to the IRS for 501c3 status would be about. > Perhaps a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: what needs deprecation?

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 06:31:42AM -0700, Volker Braun wrote: >>Something that is not imported by default is, by definition, an >>implementation detail. Its either private or public, but not both. That >>leaves us with >>PO

Re: [sage-devel] Re: what needs deprecation?

On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 06:31:42AM -0700, Volker Braun wrote: >Something that is not imported by default is, by definition, an >implementation detail. Its either private or public, but not both. That >leaves us with >POLL: >[ ] Only deprecate public interfaces >[ ] There are

Re: [sage-devel] sequences in SageMath

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Daniel Krenn wrote: > Dear all, > > similar to > graphs.some_graph > or to > codes.some_code > (and similar), I propose to introduce > sequences.some_sequence > which should provide a unified access point to all possible sequences in > SageMath. For exam

Re: [sage-devel] Re: dpkg: error processing package sagemath-upstream-binary (--configure):

Yes, thank you for the correction. We will announce here when to unhold and are working on it constantly. Regards, Jan On 1 June 2015 at 19:51, Chris Caldwell wrote: > > > On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 9:15:05 AM UTC-5, Jan Groenewald wrote: >> >> wget >> https://launchpad.net/~aims/+archive/ub

Re: [sage-devel] Re: dpkg: error processing package sagemath-upstream-binary (--configure):

On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 9:15:05 AM UTC-5, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > wget > https://launchpad.net/~aims/+archive/ubuntu/sagemath/+build/7362961/+files/sagemath-upstream-binary_6.6ppa1_amd64.deb > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: dpkg: error processing package sagemath-upstream-binary (--configure):

Not sure of this will help, but I did a fresh build of 6.8.beta2 on SageMathCloud, passed long tests, and changed the directory name. Usually this is OK and the paths all get adjusted but now I get: ~/sage-dev$ ./sage find: `/projects/53b77207-8614-4086-a032-432af4b4cdbd/sage-dev/local/var/lib

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Memory leak? Creation of DiGraph slows down.

> Why it doesn't just check if dot2tex has been installed as an optional > package? > Because one also needs an installation of graphviz as well (which is an experimental package, but a system-wide installation is what is recommended and typically used). > > Or should Sage be able to use sy

[sage-devel] Re: "The SageMath Foundation"

+1 from my side to setting this up and I'm happy to help if possible. On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 3:22:47 PM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote: > or European or other foundation would be best (e.g. for granting purposes), or possibly multiple such - I have year old plans to create a Sage foundation in Austr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 404 Error: page not found

On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 at 2:05:10 PM UTC+2, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > > Has this historical data now just disappeared? > The ticket is here https://github.com/sagemath/website/issues/14 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Memory leak? Creation of DiGraph slows down.

> Why it doesn't just check if dot2tex has been installed as an optional > package? > > Or should Sage be able to use system-wide dot2tex also? > > In any case, something should be done. Who will make a ticket? You can. Ticket 18124 was created recently, but it is not immediately related (it may c

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Memory leak? Creation of DiGraph slows down.

On Sat, 30 May 2015, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: So it seems to come from the have_dot2tex() function, in that it tests the installation of dot2tex by executing a dot2tex command. I think the easiest and best solution would be to make have_dot2tex() into a @cached_function. Why it doesn't just che

[sage-devel] Re: "The SageMath Foundation"

> > > What is the goal of this organization and the relationship with the > organization that runs SMC? Perhaps a question to the lawyers about the > coexistence of the two organizations might be a good idea? > I think that is a very good question, and also I think a question that very often

[sage-devel] "The SageMath Foundation"

Hey William, What is the goal of this organization and the relationship with the organization that runs SMC? Perhaps a question to the lawyers about the coexistence of the two organizations might be a good idea? Franco -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

[sage-devel] Can't install latest sagmath-upstream-binary from ppa

Hi, there, I met the following error when I install sage from ppa. My system is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64bit. I need your help. Thanks very much. Best Huayi ``` :~$ sudo apt-get install sagemath-upstream-binary Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Do

Re: [sage-devel] MathJax limit for TeX expression in notebook

Hi Thierry, Using SageManifolds, I can produce long equations quite easily - for testing I also decreased the value of MAXBUFFER in $SAGE_ROOT/local/share/mathjax/config/TeX-AMS_HTML-full.js (javascript file used by ipython notebook) from 5*1024 to 128. Then I have %display latex M = Manifo

[sage-devel] sequences in SageMath

Dear all, similar to graphs.some_graph or to codes.some_code (and similar), I propose to introduce sequences.some_sequence which should provide a unified access point to all possible sequences in SageMath. For example, there is fibonacci_sequence in sage.combinat.combinat, binary_recur

[sage-devel] Re: "The SageMath Foundation"

On Monday, 1 June 2015 05:34:56 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Anyways, what I'm talking about here is an independent tax exempt >> organization, with a board, >> treasurer, etc. So... are there any questions or concerns you (as >> a Sage developer) have, which I >> should keep in mind?

[sage-devel] Re: R failed to build (GOMP_4.0 not found)

I understand that due to #17349 a workaround would be to do > SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes ./sage -f r but this is weird... On Sunday, 31 May 2015 16:31:12 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > on Ubuntu 14.04 and Sage 6.8.beta2, I see > > SAGEROOT/local/lib$ ldd R/lib/libR.so > R/lib/libR.so: /usr/lib/x86_

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Automatic testing of (installed) optional packages

On Sunday, 31 May 2015 19:12:41 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Yoo ! > > > I wonder if there is a way to make a test dependent on absence of a > given > > optional package, > > not only on presence of it. > > > > There are cases where this will be handy. > > Well, Technically there is

Re: [sage-devel] Problems installing package qepcad

François Bissey wrote: > The spkg probably need an update as well as some love before being > usable. B.t.w., this is http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10224 . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop