[sage-devel] Trac#18820 needs review

Trac#18820 updates R to 3.2.1. This trivial patch needs your attention. HTH, -- Emmanuel Charpentier -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai

Re: [sage-devel] Re: About license of nauty and poset generator

On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Dima Pasechnik wrote: More about licenses, see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14110 . They think of their copyright notice as a political statement, I suppose. For what else can be said about forbidding the use for military purposes. Such a licence obviously cannot be e

[sage-devel] Re: OpenDreamKit question

On Sunday, 28 June 2015 09:43:51 UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > Hello, > I understand the jobs are funded to improve usability, mainly. > I have categorized the last 110 questions on ask.sagemath and > these are the components affected, sorted: > > symbolics 22 > algebra14 >

[sage-devel] Re: About license of nauty and poset generator

On Monday, 29 June 2015 12:30:20 UTC+1, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > More about licenses, see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14110 . This is > a > non-technical issue. Who wants to contact the makers of nauty (and poset > generation program)? I do not want, as I don't know that much about > lic

Re: [sage-devel] Re: giac/giacpy packages

I think I can start something it looks to be in src/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py It may not be necessary to modify the cython interface for thi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: giac/giacpy packages

I can help also for the giacpy syntax. We need 2 cases: only for grevlex, prime fields of char p< 2^31 or QQ (I think that in other cases giac could be very bad) may be the easiest for me is if you could start a branch with those 2 cases and some tags where I should insert the conversions and com

Re: [sage-devel] Re: giac/giacpy packages

Agreed, I was just hoping someone else would do the work for me :) On Monday 29 Jun 2015 14:59:15 Simon King wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On 2015-06-29, 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel wrote: > > Can we add a more convenient interface for computing Gröbner bases with > > Sage. That is, I'd like to b

[sage-devel] Re: giac/giacpy packages

Hi Martin, On 2015-06-29, 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel wrote: > Can we add a more convenient interface for computing Gröbner bases with Sage. > That is, I'd like to be able to say > > I.groebner_basis('giac') > > and be done with it :) I'm happy to help. If I understand correctly, we

Re: [sage-devel] giac/giacpy packages

On Sunday 21 Jun 2015 02:35:19 Han Frederic wrote: > I'd like to point out that recently http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12375 > was closed. I'd like also to thank here all the participants. > > Since sage 6.8.beta5, giac and its cython interface giacpy are avaible as > optional packages. > >

[sage-devel] About license of nauty and poset generator

More about licenses, see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14110 . This is a non-technical issue. Who wants to contact the makers of nauty (and poset generation program)? I do not want, as I don't know that much about licenses and copyright issues. I am quite sure that they have not really think

Re: [sage-devel] A new-style package that we cannot host?

On 2015-06-29 13:04, Nathann Cohen wrote: Are the install sripts able to handle that (nothing in upstream/)? I think manually downloading to upstream/ should work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group an

[sage-devel] Re: A new-style package that we cannot host?

On 29 June 2015 at 12:04, Nathann Cohen wrote: > Hello everybody, > > The ticket at #10829 adds a new-style package, but claims that we are > not allowed to redistribute upstream's files (*). it is #10879 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel"

[sage-devel] Re: A new-style package that we cannot host?

If they don't want their code to be in Sage then they can keep it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post

[sage-devel] A new-style package that we cannot host?

Hello everybody, The ticket at #10829 adds a new-style package, but claims that we are not allowed to redistribute upstream's files (*). Are the install sripts able to handle that (nothing in upstream/)? Nathann (*) Weird license, plus they want to have the names of whoever downloads it -- Yo