On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 3:38:05 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Could you try this with ecl-15.3.7, from
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18961
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18961 ?
Upgrading ecl doesn't fix the problem.
export MAKE=make -j2
export SAGE_DEBUG=yes
make
finishes with
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 2:05:07 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Perhaps they should rather generate your XML? (beezertex filename ;-))
No, seriously...
Yes, seriously. ;-) I hope that something like this will be in place
eventually.
Please note that I actually rather like the
On Aug 1, 2015 13:21, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 07/31/2015 07:51 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
Hello,
While working on http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18613 I ran into the
following problem:
Argh, the trac notifications still aren't fixed. Can someone please add
On 07/31/2015 07:51 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
Hello,
While working on http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18613 I ran into the
following problem:
Argh, the trac notifications still aren't fixed. Can someone please add
a reverse DNS entry for 128.208.160.253 (the server that's sending the
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 2:45:16 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
It would be nice if Sage cells would know about which cells they depend
on; Right now evaluating a cell in the middle is very likely to cough up an
error message about something not being defined.
Yes, Sage Cells are
Thanks, Bill. It continues to be fun and there's lots more to do. But I am
also looking forward to writing more content myself. ;-)
Rob
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 2:54:37 AM UTC-7, Bill Hart wrote:
Rob, this is truly fantastic work. I want to congratulate you on getting
this up and
Dear Bernard,
I was thinking more of the static HTML pages you sent that had been
generated from TeX/LaTeX with your GIAC extensions (giac.tex). The
mathematics on those pages might look better with MathJax and that would be
an easier scenario to configure.
For the calculator page you just
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 3:12:38 AM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
IMHO we should think about moving non-technical Sage docs to mathbook.
write an automatic converted, why not...
Sage-flavored ReST/Sphinx might be structured/predictable enough to be very
amenable to this.
--
You
On 07/31/2015 07:06 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
You don't need a closing tag that can be inserted by software,
as certainly is the case for \section or \item..
(unless you spent a large part of your life writing HTML or XML by hand,
of course :-))
The parser can insert them for you, but
Hi!
On 2015-07-31, Andrey Novoseltsev novos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 31 July 2015 02:59:26 UTC-6, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
In various places one sees things like Graph.tutte_polynomial,
Graph.lovasz_theta; whenever I see this (leave alone writing code like
this) I feel this is a typo,
Some people may know that in German we generally spell nouns upper-case.
Nonetheless, I am in favour of spelling the names in function names
lower-case, because of a comment of some of my maths professors. He said
that it is a great honour for a mathematician if his/her name is finally
used
Le samedi 1 août 2015 02:17:34 UTC+2, Rob Beezer a écrit :
Dear Bernard,
Thanks for the note and links. I was not very aware of GIAC. It could be
a useful thing for MathBook XML authors to have available.
Have you considered using MathJax within your HTML output? It too is
Le samedi 1 août 2015 02:17:34 UTC+2, Rob Beezer a écrit :
Dear Bernard,
Thanks for the note and links. I was not very aware of GIAC. It could be
a useful thing for MathBook XML authors to have available.
Have you considered using MathJax within your HTML output? It too is
The principle of least surprise would suggest that mutability should follow
the same rules independent of the matrix size. And echelon_form should
always return an immutable matrix.
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 1:51:12 AM UTC+2, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
Hello,
While working on
On Saturday, 1 August 2015 03:14:33 UTC+1, Rob Beezer wrote:
On 07/31/2015 05:25 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
And if it is so easy to convert LaTeX into HTML, why hasn't anybody
done it
successfully? tex4ht is the only one I know that comes close, and
only
because it is
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 4:14:33 AM UTC+2, Rob Beezer wrote:
Seems only tex can understand TeX. ;-)
Tex it a Turing-complete language, XML is not. Hence only TeX can
understand TeX, but for XML there are various 100% compliant parsers and
converters. IMHO your decision to use XML is
Rob, this is truly fantastic work. I want to congratulate you on getting
this up and running!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Saturday, 1 August 2015 10:45:16 UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 4:14:33 AM UTC+2, Rob Beezer wrote:
Seems only tex can understand TeX. ;-)
Tex it a Turing-complete language, XML is not. Hence only TeX can
understand TeX,
Rather, Wahr sind nur die
18 matches
Mail list logo
