Let me summarize an exchange of messages I just had with Richard.
He is upset by the fact that tax dollars (NSF grants) go to people who have
pleasure
working. Is he unable to comprehend how this is at all possible?
I wonder whether throughout his career he ever had any pleasure working...
I jus
On 11/26/15 17:17, Ralf Stephan wrote:
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 7:18:51 PM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
courses
that serve to crush the dreams of superfluous applicants to
particularly desirable professions (as freshman calculus used to be a
formal requirement to enter medical school in the Unite
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 7:18:51 PM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
> courses
> that serve to crush the dreams of superfluous applicants to
> particularly desirable professions (as freshman calculus used to be a
> formal requirement to enter medical school in the United States)"
>
> Maybe he knows so
Volker, I agree -- many thanks for making real progress.
Unfortunately, the Jupyter notebook does not work.I tried to fix the
openssl problem with
./sage -i pyopenssl
but that ended with
make: *** [all-toolchain] Error 1
Thanks for looking into this.
-Bruce
---
bash-3.2$ .
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 8:50:15 PM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 2:23:27 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH strikes again...
>>
> What can we do about it, though?
>
Simple: Do not use it. Use rpaths for libraries that you can't / don't
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 2:23:27 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH strikes again...
>
What can we do about it, though? I think the relevant module is
"webbrowser". It has rather complicated logic and is therefore rather hard
to convince to run a command through "sage-na
This is a new book by Michael Harris.
I have not read it, but there is an extensive review in the NY Review of
Books. (Dec 3, 2015)
Apparently Harris *rejects* the argument that justifies pure mathematics
because of its beauty or truth (or its utility). He says it is motivated
by pleasure.
W
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 3:40:12 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> By the way, surprisingly (to me at least) it was even possible to do 'make
> test', and have all, save for couple of timeouts, pass.
>
Just like building from source works.
The script isn't careful with timestamps and
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 5:55:26 PM UTC+1, mhfrey wrote:
> Redhat 5.11
Ah, adventures in retro computing.
You need python >= 2.6 (released in 2008)
Just install a halfway recent python somewhere, put it in your PATH, and
try again.
--
You received this message because you are su
I am trying to compile Sage 6.9 from source on Redhat 5.11. The configure
completes, but the make crashes, see below. Hopefully this is an easy fix.
Thank you for your help
Mike
***
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/nmr/software/sage/sage-6.9/build
On Wednesday, 25 November 2015 12:48:02 UTC, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> > Yes, installing Sage packages within a Sage shell (let alone within a
> > running Sage session) is not supported. It may or may not work. Since we
> > cannot guarantee that it can work, we simply disallow it.
>
> Okayy
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 17:16:29 UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure its IO bound, so parallelization won't help. You have to
> run it only once anyways...
>
well, I see (running top) Python process taking somewhere between 70 and
95% of one CPU almost all the time
while I run th
>
> The binary I posted should work on any OSX 10.11 machine. Possibly even on
> older OSX versions, though I don't have any way to test.
>
I tested this binary on 10.8 (Mavicks) and 10.9 (Yosemite) and it worked
fine on both!
Nathan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Code that needs some package should raise an error if the package is
not installed. And the interface should catch it and give consistent
and friendly error message. Either "Do this" or "Ask you system
administrator".
Do you have an example where t
> Yes, installing Sage packages within a Sage shell (let alone within a
> running Sage session) is not supported. It may or may not work. Since we
> cannot guarantee that it can work, we simply disallow it.
Okayyy, thanks. Too bad, that would have been helpful for guys who
don't know what a co
On 2015-11-24 19:22, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Is there a technical reason why "install_package" cannot work anymore?
Yes, installing Sage packages within a Sage shell (let alone within a
running Sage session) is not supported. It may or may not work. Since we
cannot guarantee that it can work, we
On 2015-11-25 06:22, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
Code that needs some
package should raise an error if the package is not installed. And the
interface should catch it and give consistent and friendly error
message. Either "Do this" or "Ask you system administrator".
Do you have an example where this i
LD_LIBRARY_PATH strikes again...
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 4:47:59 AM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 4:49:53 PM UTC-8, Nils Bruin wrote:
>>
>> On another computer I got something different (and that's an up-to-date
>> fedora 22!):
>>
>> XPCOMGlueLoad error
18 matches
Mail list logo
