Re: [sage-devel] Query about SageMath for GSOC

2016-03-11 Thread Amritpal Singh
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: > Sorry, apart from answering the odd email on this list, I'm not going to > guide such a project. I'm not particularly interested in the > "print_computation"-idea, and for the other idea on certificates, I >

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread William Stein
Volker, Any chance you have a moment to make some remarks about hashdist in this thread? https://github.com/hashdist/hashdist -- William On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > As another data point, I always had trouble running gentoo-prefix / >

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Francois Bissey
In early 2011 we had a working version of sage on gentoo-prefix on OS X via sage-on-gentoo. Then the situation degraded as apple “support” for gcc vanished. At the moment we have a working toolchain based on clang on gentoo prefix but no working fortran compiler as far as I can see. I tried to

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Francesco Biscani
On 11 March 2016 at 14:50, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Start over with "let's figure out how to do cross-platform source-based > package management." Why isn't it a fair comparison? Gentoo prefix, Nix, > and Conda all do the same thing. > I have been a Gentoo user for more

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
FWIW, I was able to build from source on Cygwin with 7.0.beta1 + http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19894 + http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19868. Since #19894 has been merged in, it should just need the latest beta + #19868, but I haven't tried it recently. Best, Travis -- You received this

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Erik Bray
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/11/2016 05:45 AM, Erik Bray wrote: >> >>> It also has few packages compared to Nix or Gentoo. Building packages >>> from source is complicated, and there are a ton of corner cases and >>> weird features that

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/11/2016 05:45 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > >> It also has few packages compared to Nix or Gentoo. Building packages >> from source is complicated, and there are a ton of corner cases and >> weird features that you need to support. It also quickly becomes >> necessary to have some way of sharing

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/11/2016 06:03 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > > I don't think this was intentional, but the degree to which this > entire post ignores / dismisses Windows comes off as a bit flippant. > Maybe you didn't know this but I'm working on getting sage and its > dependencies working on Windows. The VM

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac detected an internal error

2016-03-11 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Thanks! On 11/03/16 10:35, Volker Braun wrote: I deleted some temp files... On Friday, March 11, 2016 at 2:24:15 PM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: Hello /tmp/ looks like full again on the trac server... """ Trac detected an internal error: OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:

[sage-devel] Re: Trac detected an internal error

2016-03-11 Thread Volker Braun
I deleted some temp files... On Friday, March 11, 2016 at 2:24:15 PM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: > > Hello > > /tmp/ looks like full again on the trac server... > > """ > Trac detected an internal error: > > OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/tmp/tmpu9nAd8' > """ > > Vincent >

[sage-devel] Trac detected an internal error

2016-03-11 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hello /tmp/ looks like full again on the trac server... """ Trac detected an internal error: OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/tmp/tmpu9nAd8' """ Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-03-11 12:03, Erik Bray wrote: But really (especially these days) that should be a minority case, and Sage should have just used the `patch` I have. Since recently, I started adding some general mechanism to actually do this. I.e. make the special case that we currently have for GCC

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, March 11, 2016 at 11:03:13 AM UTC, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky > wrote: > > On 03/10/2016 03:23 PM, William Stein wrote: > >> > >> Could you say more? (I mean about what you might imagine Sage could > >> do to

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Erik Bray
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 6:23:51 PM UTC+1, William wrote: >> >> One thing it is not right now is: "setup a virtualenv with just the >> Sage library" and go at it.I very much wish this was supported, >> since

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Erik Bray
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 03/10/2016 03:23 PM, William Stein wrote: >> >> Could you say more? (I mean about what you might imagine Sage could >> do to improve -- both incrementally or dramatically?)I'm sure >> everybody really

Re: [sage-devel] Sage "and" Anaconda

2016-03-11 Thread Erik Bray
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Conda more or less passes all four, and there are only two other systems > (Nix and Gentoo prefix) that do. Its main issue is that all of the build > scripts are incredibly naive. For example, the source-based