The default version of Python in Arch Linux is 3, but I was under the
impression that the Sage brings a python version of its own, no?
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 12:29:56 AM UTC+3, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> What version of python do you get if you run python? My guess it is
> version 3, and
Hi
On 30 March 2016 at 14:53, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-03-30 14:49, Eugene E. wrote:
>
>> The default version of Python in Arch Linux is 3, but I was under the
>> impression that the Sage brings a python version of its own, no?
>>
>
> Maybe it doesn't use that to run relocate-once.py
>
>
On 2016-03-30 14:49, Eugene E. wrote:
The default version of Python in Arch Linux is 3, but I was under the
impression that the Sage brings a python version of its own, no?
Maybe it doesn't use that to run relocate-once.py
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 1:47:39 PM UTC+1, Eugene E. wrote:
>
> Sorry, forgot the log file.
>
> The packages installed on my system are:
> core/gcc 5.3.0-5 (base-devel)
>
do you have gfortan and g++ ?
I guess the only reason for Sage trying to build the gcc is that these are
missing.
Ins
forgot the obligatory (:-)) rtfm link:
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source.html#prerequisites
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 3:10:05 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 1:47:39 PM UTC+1, Eugene E. wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, forgot the log file.
>>
>> T
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 1:57:38 PM UTC+1, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On 30 March 2016 at 14:53, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote:
>
>> On 2016-03-30 14:49, Eugene E. wrote:
>>
>>> The default version of Python in Arch Linux is 3, but I was under the
>>> impression that the Sage brings a pyth
It's looking like Windows is getting support for the Linux API in its
kernel (think the reverse of Wine) allowing it to run native Linux
binaries.
See http://blog.dustinkirkland.com/2016/03/ubuntu-on-windows.html. It
seems like this might be a great alternative to Cygwin for Sage on Windows.
I can confirm that I was able to compile mprf using the patch you provided.
Then ATLAS was compiling for ages, and after that another error occurred,
this time compiling brial:
libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../libpolybori/include/polybori
Sounds like the devil is ice-skating to work today ;-)
Of course MS had a posix layer since about forever, they just never did
anything with it or really made it available for others to use...
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 6:51:50 PM UTC+2, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> It's looking like Windows is g
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Sounds like the devil is ice-skating to work today ;-)
>
> Of course MS had a posix layer since about forever, they just never did
> anything with it or really made it available for others to use...
"the POSIX subsystem was essentially a che
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 8:15:06 PM UTC+2, William wrote:
>
> "the POSIX subsystem was essentially a checkbox feature to meet some
> government contracting requirements. [...]"
>
Thought that refers to the ancient "posix subsystem", not the more recent
"windows services for unix" which I
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 8:15:06 PM UTC+2, William wrote:
>>
>> "the POSIX subsystem was essentially a checkbox feature to meet some
>> government contracting requirements. [...]"
>
>
> Thought that refers to the ancient "posix subsyst
It looks like this thing is going to be pretty solid [1]. I'm actually
incredibly excited about it, more than I have been about Windows for about
20 years.
Bill.
[1] https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2016/P488
On Wednesday, 30 March 2016 18:51:50 UTC+2, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> It's looking
It's almost a year since I predicted Microsoft would do something like
this. I have an email from September last year which was a followup email
some months after I told a colleague something like this would happen. If I
recall our conversation correctly, I was pretty specific about being able
Hello,
I am trying to compile from source. I am running Kubuntu (Ubuntu 15.10) on
kernel 4.2.0-34-generic.
I have attached the dochtml.log file in .../sage-7.1/logs
In awe and thanks,
Miguel-Angel Manrique
--
Setting permissions of DOT_SAGE direc
I'm not sure what's going on with the docbuild, but FYI you should be able
to run Sage (documentation is built after Sage is built). What happens
when you run /mnt/zeta/sage-7.1/sage?
David
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:20 PM, miguel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to compile from source. I am run
Hello
Executing ./sage runs Sage beautifully :-)
Thank you.
Miguel-Angel Manrique
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 5:43:12 PM UTC-7, David Roe wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what's going on with the docbuild, but FYI you should be able
> to run Sage (documentation is built after Sage is built). What
Hello
Executing ./sage runs Sage beautifully :-)
Thank you.
Miguel-Angel Manrique
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googleg
I try to work on #19435, which has nothing to do with knot theory. What I
got is
[reference] history_and_license: 0 todos, 1 index, 0 citations, 0 modules
[reference] homology: 1 todos, 19 index, 32 citations, 18 modules
[reference] interfaces: 2 todos, 46 index, 2 citations, 45 modules
[referen
19 matches
Mail list logo
