There is also "huge" package polytopes_db_4d which I do care about, but it
is hard to find in listings, and given its 8GB size I don't download again
and again but rather install locally.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsub
I just realized that we do not have chomp included anymore on the list of
optional packages. Moreover, it is now broken!
This is really the last of the old-style packages I would like to see kept.
Although really we should try and upgrade it...but maybe in the short-term,
we can just make it ne
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23371. Thanks for the report!
David
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:11 AM, Mathis CARISTAN
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed a behaviour of Sequences that seems wrong to me. If I have a
> Sequence with a given universe, I can add elements that are not included in
On 2017-07-05 14:50, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> TL;DR: should we drop support for old-style .spkg packages completely in
> Sage?
Will this mean that they stop working immediately or they will only be
broken if certain parts in SageMath are altered by some (future)
ticket/fix etc.?
--
You received t
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 02:50:53PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> TL;DR: should we drop support for old-style .spkg packages completely in
> Sage?
+1 (it could have been done a while ago).
The wiki page below was opened two years ago, and the few remaining
unclassified packages do not seem o
On 2017-07-04 18:32, mforets wrote:
it seems to be something with the 10.12 upgrade:
https://github.com/jupyter/notebook/issues/2438
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44057601/ipython-notebook-will-not-start-on-command-line
Indeed. The conclusion seems to be that it's a bug in OS X, which wi
>
> > This will be a pain to manage. These branches will go stale very quickly
> > and rebasing will be a frustrating chore. If you have programs that you
> > don't want to install in sage proper, then just maintain them as a
> > python package with sage as a dependency and put the source on gi
Since we cannot easily translate this to Maxima---and what do
you do if there is one real and one complex variable?--- I have
created a simplification ticket that will cause immediately
sage: sqrt(-4*x+4)
2*sqrt(-x + 1)
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23368
Regards,
On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at
TL;DR: should we drop support for old-style .spkg packages completely in
Sage?
Old-style packages are a relic from the old Sage development model from
Sage versions < 6.0. They are packages containing the sources and
metadata in one .spkg archive. New-style packages, with metadata in the
main
On 2017-07-03 23:33, Nils Bruin wrote:
This will be a pain to manage. These branches will go stale very quickly
and rebasing will be a frustrating chore. If you have programs that you
don't want to install in sage proper, then just maintain them as a
python package with sage as a dependency and p
Hi,
I noticed a behaviour of Sequences that seems wrong to me. If I have a
Sequence with a given universe, I can add elements that are not included in
this universe.
For example :
sage: foo = Sequence([], universe=ZZ)
sage: foo += [1/2]
sage: foo, foo.universe(), foo[0].parent()
([1/2], Integer
11 matches
Mail list logo
