[sage-devel] Online Sage Days

2017-09-09 Thread Maarten Derickx
Great idea, I especially like: * python 3 * sage infrastructure * sage packaging I plan to work on https://github.com/sagemath/sage_sample quite a bit. For which I hope that it falls under sage packaging ;) For python 3 it would be good to make some more documentation on how to get on the

[sage-devel] Re: From SageNB to jupyter

2017-09-09 Thread Enrique Artal
It is a server with 8 cores and 32GB of RAM, but with several other sagenb processes and twenty users on jupyterhub plus 60 on the sagenb instances cause no performance issue (usually) El sábado, 9 de septiembre de 2017, 15:03:53 (UTC+2), kcrisman escribió: > > > > On Saturday, September 9,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SAGE_PATH and PYTHONPATH

2017-09-09 Thread Maarten Derickx
Hi Ralf, Yes but considering you are on sage-devel I thought there might be a reasonable chance that you would run into this issue sooner or later (especially if you set pythonpath in your bashrc). I just wanted to shamelessly advertise that trac ticket to potentially interested people.

[sage-devel] performance issue with initialization of trees

2017-09-09 Thread 'Martin R' via sage-devel
Dear all, I'm having a performance problem, and I believe I have successfully located it in the initialization code of LabelledBinaryTrees. Part of my code is simply computing the binary tree corresponding to a permutation. I have the following timing: sage: timeit("[pi.binary_search_tree()

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SAGE_PATH and PYTHONPATH

2017-09-09 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
On 09/09/2017 05:05 PM, Maarten Derickx wrote: > In case people start setting pythonpath after reading this thread: > you will actually get some silly doctest failures if python path is > set. I don't need to set SAGE_PATH (or PYTHONPATH) for testing Sage. All I want is to tell Sage about a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: doctests: non-sorted output

2017-09-09 Thread David Roe
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Maarten Derickx < m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your input David. We discussed it on trac, and decided to leave > the situation as is on python 2.7 because it is stable enough as is given > the pynormaliz fix. > > For python 3 we propese to fix

Re: [sage-devel] Re: doctests: non-sorted output

2017-09-09 Thread Maarten Derickx
Thanks for your input David. We discussed it on trac, and decided to leave the situation as is on python 2.7 because it is stable enough as is given the pynormaliz fix. For python 3 we propese to fix the sorting in upstream ipython. Using str based sort only if the standard sorting raises an

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE_PATH and PYTHONPATH

2017-09-09 Thread Maarten Derickx
In case people start setting pythonpath after reading this thread: you will actually get some silly doctest failures if python path is set. I have made a ticket for this which fixes these doctest: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23613 It is a very Small change and it currently needs review.

[sage-devel] Re: From SageNB to jupyter

2017-09-09 Thread kcrisman
On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 6:12:49 AM UTC-4, Enrique Artal wrote: > > It is quite useful, indeed. We have installed it in our servers. > Could it be made "even easier" to deploy? Sagenb really just required someone who knew how to give things a domain name and commands to start a

[sage-devel] Re: From SageNB to jupyter

2017-09-09 Thread Enrique Artal
It is quite useful, indeed. We have installed it in our servers. El viernes, 8 de septiembre de 2017, 16:48:49 (UTC+2), kcrisman escribió: > > > > On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:16:14 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> did you see this: >>

[sage-devel] Online Sage Days

2017-09-09 Thread David Roe
Hi everyone, I'd like to organize some online Sage Days, where people gather on zulip.sagemath.org and work on Sage together. The two things to be decided are 1. What topics should we focus on? 2. What days/times work for the most people? Some of these may transition into in-person working groups